• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可观测处理异质性的优势决策的贝叶斯多层多变量逻辑回归。

Bayesian multilevel multivariate logistic regression for superiority decision-making under observable treatment heterogeneity.

机构信息

Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Department of Theory, Methodology, and Statistics, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02034-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-023-02034-z
PMID:37798704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10552398/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In medical, social, and behavioral research we often encounter datasets with a multilevel structure and multiple correlated dependent variables. These data are frequently collected from a study population that distinguishes several subpopulations with different (i.e., heterogeneous) effects of an intervention. Despite the frequent occurrence of such data, methods to analyze them are less common and researchers often resort to either ignoring the multilevel and/or heterogeneous structure, analyzing only a single dependent variable, or a combination of these. These analysis strategies are suboptimal: Ignoring multilevel structures inflates Type I error rates, while neglecting the multivariate or heterogeneous structure masks detailed insights.

METHODS

To analyze such data comprehensively, the current paper presents a novel Bayesian multilevel multivariate logistic regression model. The clustered structure of multilevel data is taken into account, such that posterior inferences can be made with accurate error rates. Further, the model shares information between different subpopulations in the estimation of average and conditional average multivariate treatment effects. To facilitate interpretation, multivariate logistic regression parameters are transformed to posterior success probabilities and differences between them.

RESULTS

A numerical evaluation compared our framework to less comprehensive alternatives and highlighted the need to model the multilevel structure: Treatment comparisons based on the multilevel model had targeted Type I error rates, while single-level alternatives resulted in inflated Type I errors. Further, the multilevel model was more powerful than a single-level model when the number of clusters was higher. A re-analysis of the Third International Stroke Trial data illustrated how incorporating a multilevel structure, assessing treatment heterogeneity, and combining dependent variables contributed to an in-depth understanding of treatment effects. Further, we demonstrated how Bayes factors can aid in the selection of a suitable model.

CONCLUSION

The method is useful in prediction of treatment effects and decision-making within subpopulations from multiple clusters, while taking advantage of the size of the entire study sample and while properly incorporating the uncertainty in a principled probabilistic manner using the full posterior distribution.

摘要

背景

在医学、社会和行为研究中,我们经常遇到具有多层次结构和多个相关因变量的数据集。这些数据通常是从具有不同(即异质)干预效果的研究人群中收集的。尽管这种数据经常出现,但分析它们的方法却不常见,研究人员通常要么忽略多层次和/或异质结构,要么只分析一个单一的因变量,要么两者兼而有之。这些分析策略并不理想:忽略多层次结构会导致 I 型错误率膨胀,而忽略多变量或异质结构会掩盖详细的见解。

方法

为了全面分析此类数据,本文提出了一种新的贝叶斯多层次多变量逻辑回归模型。该模型考虑了多层次数据的聚类结构,以便能够以准确的误差率进行后验推断。此外,该模型在估计平均和条件平均多变量治疗效果时,在不同子群体之间共享信息。为了便于解释,将多元逻辑回归参数转换为后验成功概率及其差异。

结果

数值评估将我们的框架与不太全面的替代方案进行了比较,并强调了对多层次结构进行建模的必要性:基于多层次模型的治疗比较具有靶向 I 型错误率,而单层次替代方案则导致 I 型错误率膨胀。此外,当聚类数较高时,多层次模型比单层次模型更有效。对第三次国际中风试验数据的重新分析说明了如何纳入多层次结构、评估治疗异质性以及组合因变量,有助于深入了解治疗效果。此外,我们还展示了贝叶斯因子如何有助于选择合适的模型。

结论

该方法在预测多聚类的多个子群体中的治疗效果和决策方面非常有用,同时利用整个研究样本的大小,并以有原则的概率方式利用完整的后验分布,正确地纳入不确定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a55/10552398/408cc324c230/12874_2023_2034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a55/10552398/408cc324c230/12874_2023_2034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a55/10552398/408cc324c230/12874_2023_2034_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian multilevel multivariate logistic regression for superiority decision-making under observable treatment heterogeneity.基于可观测处理异质性的优势决策的贝叶斯多层多变量逻辑回归。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02034-z.
2
Bayesian Multivariate Logistic Regression for Superiority and Inferiority Decision-Making under Observable Treatment Heterogeneity.贝叶斯多元逻辑回归在可观测治疗异质性下的优越性和劣性决策。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):859-882. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2337340. Epub 2024 May 11.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Multilevel data and bayesian analysis in traffic safety.交通安全中的多层次数据和贝叶斯分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1556-65. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.013. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
5
Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.第2部分。开发增强的统计方法,以评估与多种空气污染物的未知数量主要来源相关的健康影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun(183 Pt 1-2):51-113.
6
Bayesian methods for the analysis of small sample multilevel data with a complex variance structure.贝叶斯方法在具有复杂方差结构的小样本多层次数据分析中的应用。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Jun;18(2):151-64. doi: 10.1037/a0030642. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
7
Estimating multilevel logistic regression models when the number of clusters is low: a comparison of different statistical software procedures.聚类数量较少时多层逻辑回归模型的估计:不同统计软件程序的比较
Int J Biostat. 2010 Apr 22;6(1):Article 16. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1195.
8
Multilevel Bayesian networks for the analysis of hierarchical health care data.多层次贝叶斯网络在分析分层医疗保健数据中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2013 Mar;57(3):171-83. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
9
A tutorial on individual participant data meta-analysis using Bayesian multilevel modeling to estimate alcohol intervention effects across heterogeneous studies.使用贝叶斯多层次建模对个体参与者数据进行元分析教程,以估计跨异质研究的酒精干预效果。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jul;94:162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
A multilevel Bayesian framework for predicting municipal waste generation rates.一种用于预测城市垃圾生成率的多层次贝叶斯框架。
Waste Manag. 2021 May 15;127:90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced Stress-Resilience Training (ESRT) for graduate-entry medical students: a randomised-controlled, mixed-method investigation.针对本科起点医学生的强化应激恢复力训练(ESRT):一项随机对照混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):1242. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07768-6.
2
Regional and patient-level determinants of endoscopic utilization in rural healthcare: a multi-level analysis.农村医疗保健中内镜使用的区域和患者层面决定因素:多层次分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 12;15:1596332. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1596332. eCollection 2025.
3
Young adults' intention to encourage COVID-19 vaccination among their grandparents: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of college students in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian Multivariate Logistic Regression for Superiority and Inferiority Decision-Making under Observable Treatment Heterogeneity.贝叶斯多元逻辑回归在可观测治疗异质性下的优越性和劣性决策。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):859-882. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2337340. Epub 2024 May 11.
2
Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in R.在R语言中学习哈密顿蒙特卡洛方法。
Am Stat. 2021;75(4):403-413. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2020.1865198. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
3
Decision-making with multiple correlated binary outcomes in clinical trials.
年轻人鼓励祖父母接种新冠疫苗的意愿:一项针对中国大学生的全国性横断面调查。
Vaccine X. 2024 Jan 17;16:100439. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100439. eCollection 2024 Jan.
临床试验中具有多个相关二元结局的决策制定。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3265-3277. doi: 10.1177/0962280220922256. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Bayesian cancer clinical trial designs with subgroup-specific decisions.贝叶斯癌症临床试验设计与亚组特异性决策。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Mar;90:105860. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105860. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
5
Bayes factors for superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs.优效性、非劣效性和等效性设计的贝叶斯因子。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0699-7.
6
Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models.多分类逻辑回归预测模型的样本量考虑因素和预测性能。
Stat Med. 2019 Apr 30;38(9):1601-1619. doi: 10.1002/sim.8063. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
7
Bayesian Hierarchical Models.贝叶斯层次模型
JAMA. 2018 Dec 11;320(22):2365-2366. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17977.
8
Three Insights from a Bayesian Interpretation of the One-Sided Value.对单边值的贝叶斯解释的三点见解。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;77(3):529-539. doi: 10.1177/0013164416669201. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
9
A randomised trial to compare cognitive outcome after gamma knife radiosurgery versus whole brain radiation therapy in patients with multiple brain metastases: research protocol CAR-study B.一项比较伽玛刀放射外科与全脑放疗治疗多发脑转移瘤患者认知结局的随机试验:CAR-Study B 研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 21;18(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4106-2.
10
Utility-based designs for randomized comparative trials with categorical outcomes.用于具有分类结局的随机对照试验的基于效用的设计。
Stat Med. 2016 Oct 30;35(24):4285-4305. doi: 10.1002/sim.6989. Epub 2016 May 18.