• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient factors associated with conveyance decision-making by Emergency Medical Services professionals in patients with a syncope: a cross-sectional factorial survey design.与急诊医疗服务专业人员在晕厥患者中做出转运决策相关的患者因素:一项横断面析因调查设计。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00890-y.
2
Factors influencing the decision to convey or not to convey elderly people to the emergency department after emergency ambulance attendance: a systematic mixed studies review.影响在紧急救护车出诊后决定是否将老年人送往急诊科的因素:一项系统的混合研究综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 30;8(8):e021732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021732.
3
Changing role of EMS -analyses of non-conveyed and conveyed patients in Finland.EMS 角色转变——芬兰未转院和转院患者分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 29;28(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00741-w.
4
Ambulance crew-initiated non-conveyance in the Helsinki EMS system-A retrospective cohort study.救护车机组人员发起的不转运在赫尔辛基紧急医疗服务系统中的回顾性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 May;66(5):625-633. doi: 10.1111/aas.14049. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Outcomes and emergency medical services resource utilization among patients with syncope arriving to the emergency department by ambulance.通过救护车送至急诊科的晕厥患者的治疗结果及急诊医疗服务资源利用情况。
CJEM. 2019 Jul;21(4):499-504. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.464. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
6
A retrospective comparison between non-conveyed and conveyed patients in ambulance care.非转运与转运患者在救护车照护中的回顾性比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 29;26(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0557-3.
7
Non-conveyance of older adult patients and association with subsequent clinical and adverse events after initial assessment by ambulance clinicians: a cohort analysis.老年患者未转院与救护车临床医生初步评估后后续临床和不良事件的关联:队列分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00548-7.
8
A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review.从患者安全和专业角度看待救护车转运中的非转运问题:系统综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jul 17;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6.
9
Epidemiological Determinants of Patient Non-Conveyance to the Hospital in an Emergency Medical Service Environment.在紧急医疗服务环境中,影响患者未能被送往医院的流行病学决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;20(14):6404. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146404.
10
Characteristics of non-conveyed patients in emergency medical services (EMS): a one-year prospective descriptive and comparative study in a region of Sweden.非转运患者在急救医疗服务(EMS)中的特点:瑞典某地区为期一年的前瞻性描述性和对照研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 10;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00353-8.

引用本文的文献

1
An analysis of characteristics and associated factors for re-contacts after EMS non-conveyance: a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands.院外急救非转运后再次联系的特征及相关因素分析:荷兰的一项回顾性队列研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 17;33(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01365-8.
2
An analysis of ambulance re-contacts after non-conveyance: a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands.非转运后救护车再次联系情况分析:荷兰的一项回顾性队列研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 1;33(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01332-3.
3
Not Just 9-1-1: The Expanded Work Environment of United States Emergency Medical Service Clinicians.不止是911:美国紧急医疗服务临床医生不断扩展的工作环境
Cureus. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):e72779. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72779. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of non-conveyance ambulance runs: A retrospective study in the Netherlands.非转运救护车出诊的特点:荷兰的一项回顾性研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2019;10(4):239-243. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2019.04.008.
2
Ambulance nurses' experiences of deciding a patient does not require ambulance care.救护车护士判定患者不需要救护车护理的经历。
Nurs Open. 2019 Mar 19;6(3):783-789. doi: 10.1002/nop2.255. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
The ambulance nurse experiences of non-conveying patients.救护车护士对不转运患者的体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jan;28(1-2):235-244. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14626. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope.2018年欧洲心脏病学会晕厥诊断和管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):1883-1948. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037.
5
Opportunities for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Care of Syncope.晕厥的紧急医疗服务(EMS)护理机会。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug;31(4):349-52. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000376. Epub 2016 May 23.
6
Short-term Prognosis and Current Management of Syncopal Patients at Intermediate Risk: Results from the IRiS (Intermediate-Risk Syncope) Study.中度风险晕厥患者的短期预后及当前管理:IRiS(中度风险晕厥)研究结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):941-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.13013. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Electrocardiogram interpretation skills among ambulance nurses.救护车护士的心电图解读技能。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Jun;15(4):262-8. doi: 10.1177/1474515114566158. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
8
A qualitative study of systemic influences on paramedic decision making: care transitions and patient safety.一项关于系统因素对护理人员决策影响的定性研究:护理转接与患者安全。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1 Suppl):45-53. doi: 10.1177/1355819614558472.
9
Factors influencing ambulance nurses' adherence to a national protocol ambulance care: an implementation study in the Netherlands.影响救护护士遵守国家救护护理协议的因素:荷兰的一项实施研究
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000133.
10
Increasing utilisation of emergency ambulances.急诊救护车使用率不断提高。
Aust Health Rev. 2011 Feb;35(1):63-9. doi: 10.1071/AH09866.

与急诊医疗服务专业人员在晕厥患者中做出转运决策相关的患者因素:一项横断面析因调查设计。

Patient factors associated with conveyance decision-making by Emergency Medical Services professionals in patients with a syncope: a cross-sectional factorial survey design.

机构信息

School of Health Studies, Research Department of Emergency and Critical Care, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Emergency Medical Service, RAV Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00890-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-023-00890-y
PMID:37798716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557231/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical decision-making of non-conveyance is perceived as complex and difficult by emergency medical services (EMS) professionals. Patients with a transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) based on syncope constitute a significant part of the non-conveyance population. Risk stratification is the basis of the clinical decision-making process by EMS professionals. This risk stratification is based on various patient factors. This study aimed to explore patient factors significantly associated with conveyance decision-making by EMS professionals in patients with a TLOC based on syncope.

METHODS

A cross-sectional vignette study with a factorial survey design was conducted. Patient factors were derived from the "National Protocol Ambulance Care", and all possible combinations of these factors and underlying categories were combined, resulting in 256 unique vignettes (24442 = 256). Patient factors presented either low-risk or high-risk factors for adverse events. Data were collected through an online questionnaire, in which participants received a random sample of 15 vignettes. For each vignette, the respondent indicated whether the patient would need to be conveyed to the emergency department or not. A multilevel logistic regression analysis with stepwise backward elimination was performed to analyse factors significantly associated with conveyance decision-making. In the logistic model, we modelled the probability of non-conveyance.

RESULTS

110 respondents were included, with 1646 vignettes being assessed. Mean age 45.5 (SD 9.3), male gender 63.6%, and years of experience 13.2 (SD 8.9). Multilevel analysis showed two patient factors contributing significantly to conveyance decision-making: 'red flags' and 'prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG)'. Of these patient factors, three underlying categories were significantly associated with non-conveyance: 'sudden cardiac death < 40 years of age in family history' (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.50; p < 0.001), 'cardiovascular abnormalities, pulmonary embolism or pulmonary hypertension in the medical history' (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.91; p = 0.01), and 'abnormal prehospital ECG' (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.72; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sudden cardiac death < 40 years of age in family history, medical history, and abnormal ECG are significantly negatively associated with non-conveyance decision-making by EMS professionals in patients with a TLOC based on syncope. Low-risk factors do not play a significant role in conveyance decision-making.

摘要

背景

非转运的临床决策被认为是复杂和困难的紧急医疗服务(EMS)专业人员。以晕厥为基础的短暂性意识丧失(TLOC)患者构成了非转运人群的重要组成部分。风险分层是 EMS 专业人员临床决策过程的基础。这种风险分层基于各种患者因素。本研究旨在探讨 TLOC 基于晕厥的患者中与 EMS 专业人员转运决策显著相关的患者因素。

方法

采用交叉案例研究和析因调查设计进行横断面研究。患者因素源自《国家协议救护车护理》,并将这些因素的所有可能组合和潜在类别结合起来,得出 256 个独特的案例(24442=256)。患者因素呈现出不良事件的低风险或高风险因素。数据通过在线问卷收集,参与者收到了 15 个随机样本的案例。对于每个案例,回答者都要指示患者是否需要被转送到急诊室。采用逐步向后消除的多水平逻辑回归分析来分析与转运决策显著相关的因素。在逻辑模型中,我们对非转运的概率进行建模。

结果

共纳入 110 名受访者,评估了 1646 个案例。平均年龄 45.5(SD 9.3),男性 63.6%,经验年限 13.2(SD 8.9)。多水平分析显示两个患者因素对转运决策有显著影响:“红色标记”和“院前心电图(ECG)”。在这些患者因素中,有三个潜在类别与非转运显著相关:“家族史中<40 岁的突发性心脏死亡”(OR 0.33,95%CI 0.22-0.50;p<0.001),“病史中有心血管异常、肺栓塞或肺动脉高压”(OR 0.62,95%CI 0.43-0.91;p=0.01)和“院前心电图异常”(OR 0.54,95%CI 0.41-0.72;p<0.001)。

结论

家族史中<40 岁的突发性心脏死亡、病史和异常心电图与 EMS 专业人员在 TLOC 基于晕厥的患者中非转运决策显著负相关。低风险因素在转运决策中不起重要作用。