Kaski J C, Crea F, Meran D, Rodriguez L, Araujo L, Chierchia S, Davies G, Maseri A
Circulation. 1986 Dec;74(6):1255-65. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.6.1255.
It has been shown in different groups of patients with variant angina that coronary spasm can be reproduced by physiologic maneuvers and pharmacologic agents. It is not known, however, to what extent different stimuli can induce spasm in the same patient. To investigate whether coronary arterial spasm results from specific abnormal agonist-receptor interactions or from a local nonspecific coronary supersensitivity to different stimuli, 28 patients with vasospastic angina were submitted to a series of diverse vasoconstrictive stimuli known to provoke coronary spasm. Ergonovine, hyperventilation, handgrip, cold pressor, and exercise-tests, were carried out in all 28 patients. In the last 15 patients histamine was also administered. Spasm was provoked by ergonovine in 96% of patients, by hyperventilation in 54%, by histamine in 47%, by exercise in 46%, and by the cold pressor and handgrip tests in 11% and 7%, respectively. No significant differences were found in the responses to provocative tests of patients with normal coronary arteries or nonsignificant stenoses and those with significant lesions. In the same individual, spasm was induced by at least two vasoconstrictive stimuli, although with a different mechanism of action, in 82% of patients and spasm was induced by three or more stimuli in 39%. Tests were repeated in at least 23 patients and short-term reproducibility paralleled sensitivity. These results suggest that in patients with variant angina, a local nonspecific supersensitivity rather than an abnormal specific agonist-receptor interaction plays a major role in the genesis of coronary arterial spasm.
在不同组的变异型心绞痛患者中已表明,生理性操作和药物制剂可诱发冠状动脉痉挛。然而,尚不清楚不同刺激在同一患者中能在多大程度上诱发痉挛。为了研究冠状动脉痉挛是由特定的异常激动剂 - 受体相互作用引起,还是由局部对不同刺激的非特异性冠状动脉超敏反应引起,对28例血管痉挛性心绞痛患者进行了一系列已知可诱发冠状动脉痉挛的不同血管收缩刺激试验。对所有28例患者进行了麦角新碱、过度通气、握力、冷加压和运动试验。在最后15例患者中还给予了组胺。麦角新碱诱发痉挛的患者占96%,过度通气诱发痉挛的患者占54%,组胺诱发痉挛的患者占47%,运动诱发痉挛的患者占46%,冷加压试验和握力试验诱发痉挛的患者分别占11%和7%。在冠状动脉正常或狭窄不明显的患者与有明显病变的患者的激发试验反应中未发现显著差异。在同一患者中,82%的患者至少由两种血管收缩刺激诱发痉挛,尽管作用机制不同,39%的患者由三种或更多刺激诱发痉挛。至少23例患者重复进行了试验,短期重复性与敏感性平行。这些结果表明,在变异型心绞痛患者中,局部非特异性超敏反应而非异常的特异性激动剂 - 受体相互作用在冠状动脉痉挛的发生中起主要作用。