• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童与父母关系的表征:意大利版儿童-父母关系量表(CPRS-I)的效度验证。

The representation of child-parent relation: validation of the Italian version of the child-parent relationship scale (CPRS-I).

作者信息

Rinaldi Teresa, Castelli Ilaria, Palena Nicola, Greco Andrea, Pianta Robert, Marchetti Antonella, Valle Annalisa

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Università eCampus, Novedrate, Italy.

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 20;14:1194644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1194644. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1194644
PMID:37799528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10547905/
Abstract

This study proposes a psychometric validation of the Italian version of the Child-Parent Relationship Scale (CPRS) developed by Pianta in 1992. Based on attachment theory, the scale assesses parents' relationship perceptions with their own child and comprises three scales: Closeness, Conflict, and Dependency. A sample of 501 parents (188 fathers and 313 mothers) completed 30 items of the Italian version of the Child-Parent Relationship Scale (CPRS-I) online, but only 437 answered 85% of the entire protocol; hence, the analyses only focused on 437 participants. The first analysis of the original theoretical model revealed poor fit, item loadings, and internal consistency. Therefore, a follow-up analysis was conducted. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses with a split sample (EFA = 218; CFA = 219) confirmed the original three-factor structure of the Italian sample, although some items were eliminated. The validity and reliability of the Italian version of the CPRS-I were also verified by correlating the above three factors with measures of adult attachment styles and children's internalizing and externalizing behaviors. The CPRS-I showed significant correlations with all tested constructs, in line with those found by Driscoll and Pianta for the short form of the scale. Our results confirm that the CPRS-I has the same structure as the original scale; therefore, it can be a useful tool for assessing parents' perceptions of their relationship with their children. The implications for educational and clinical settings are also discussed.

摘要

本研究对1992年由皮亚塔编制的《亲子关系量表》(CPRS)意大利语版本进行了心理测量学验证。基于依恋理论,该量表评估父母对自己孩子的关系认知,包括三个分量表:亲密性、冲突性和依赖性。501名家长(188名父亲和313名母亲)的样本在线完成了《亲子关系量表》意大利语版本(CPRS-I)的30个项目,但只有437人回答了整个问卷的85%;因此,分析仅聚焦于437名参与者。对原始理论模型的首次分析显示拟合度、项目载荷和内部一致性较差。因此,进行了后续分析。对一个分割样本进行探索性和验证性分析(探索性因素分析=218;验证性因素分析=219),尽管剔除了一些项目,但证实了意大利样本的原始三因素结构。通过将上述三个因素与成人依恋风格以及儿童内化和外化行为的测量指标进行关联,也验证了CPRS-I意大利语版本的效度和信度。CPRS-I与所有测试构念均呈现显著相关性,这与德里斯科尔和皮亚塔对该量表简版的研究结果一致。我们的结果证实CPRS-I与原始量表具有相同的结构;因此,它可以作为评估父母对其与孩子关系认知的有用工具。同时还讨论了其在教育和临床环境中的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9205/10547905/3edba83b43a8/fpsyg-14-1194644-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9205/10547905/3edba83b43a8/fpsyg-14-1194644-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9205/10547905/3edba83b43a8/fpsyg-14-1194644-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The representation of child-parent relation: validation of the Italian version of the child-parent relationship scale (CPRS-I).儿童与父母关系的表征:意大利版儿童-父母关系量表(CPRS-I)的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 20;14:1194644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1194644. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychometric properties of a 20-item version of the Maternal-Fetal Attachment Scale in a sample of Italian expectant women.意大利孕妇样本中20项版本的母婴依恋量表的心理测量学特性。
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
3
Development and psychometric analysis of the student-teacher relationship scale - short form.师生关系量表简版的编制与心理测量学分析
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 26;6:898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00898. eCollection 2015.
4
Factor Structure of the Chinese Version of the Parent Adult-Child Relationship Questionnaire.中文版父母-成年子女关系问卷的因子结构
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 13;9:315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00315. eCollection 2018.
5
The Mentalized Affectivity Scale (MAS): Development and validation of the Italian version.《心理化情感量表(MAS)》:意大利版本的开发与验证。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249272. eCollection 2021.
6
Father-child closeness and conflict: Validating measures for nonresident fathers.父-子亲近度与冲突:验证非居住父亲的度量标准。
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Dec;31(8):1074-1080. doi: 10.1037/fam0000384.
7
Validation of the French Version of Conners' Parent Rating Scale Revised, Short Version: Factorial Structure and Reliability.《康纳斯父母评定量表修订版法语版简版的验证:因子结构与信度》
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;61(4):236-42. doi: 10.1177/0706743716635549.
8
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
9
A Parent-Report Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children: Psychometric Properties of an Italian Version.父母报告儿童性别认同问卷:意大利版本的心理测量特性。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Jul;48(5):1603-1615. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1372-7. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Can closeness, conflict, and dependency be used to characterize students' perceptions of the affective relationship with their teacher? Testing a new child measure in middle childhood.亲密、冲突和依赖能否用于描述学生对与教师情感关系的认知?对童年中期一种新的儿童测量方法进行测试。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Dec;85(4):479-97. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12094. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The Quality of the Parent-Child Relationship in the Context of Autism: The Role of Parental Resolution of the Child's Diagnosis, Parenting Stress, and Caregiving Burden.自闭症背景下的亲子关系质量:父母对孩子诊断的接受程度、育儿压力及照料负担的作用
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Jul 18;15(7):142. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15070142.
2
FACILITY: feeding the family-the intergenerational approach to fight obesity, a cross-sectional study protocol.机构:养活家庭——对抗肥胖的代际方法,一项横断面研究方案
Front Pediatr. 2025 Mar 31;13:1450324. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1450324. eCollection 2025.
3
Caregiver Predictions of Their 3- to 6-Year-Old Child Who Stutters' Communication Attitude.

本文引用的文献

1
Parent-child relationships and psychological distress: survey of parents from low-income families after the COVID-19 pandemic.亲子关系与心理困扰:新冠疫情后来自低收入家庭的父母调查。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 5;11:1158698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1158698. eCollection 2023.
2
Self-Efficacy Beliefs of University Students: Examining Factor Validity and Measurement Invariance of the New Academic Self-Efficacy Scale.大学生的自我效能信念:检验新学术自我效能量表的因素效度和测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 13;12:498824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.498824. eCollection 2021.
3
Predictive Models of Maternal Harsh Parenting During COVID-19 in China, Italy, and Netherlands.
照顾者对其 3 至 6 岁口吃儿童沟通态度的预测。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jul 9;67(7):2086-2105. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00662. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
4
The association between parents phubbing and prosocial behavior among Chinese preschool children: a moderated mediation model.中国学龄前儿童家长低头族行为与亲社会行为之间的关联:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 18;15:1338055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1338055. eCollection 2024.
5
Nurse home visiting to improve child and maternal outcomes: 5-year follow-up of an Australian randomised controlled trial.护士家庭访视以改善儿童和产妇结局:澳大利亚一项随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0277773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277773. eCollection 2022.
6
Coparenting and parenting pathways from the couple relationship to children's behavior problems.从夫妻关系到儿童行为问题的共同养育和养育途径。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Mar;33(2):215-225. doi: 10.1037/fam0000492. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
7
Direct, indirect, and buffering effects of support for mothers on children's socioemotional adjustment.母亲支持对儿童社会情感适应的直接、间接和缓冲效应。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Oct;32(7):894-903. doi: 10.1037/fam0000438. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
中国、意大利和荷兰新冠疫情期间母亲严厉育儿的预测模型
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;12:722453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722453. eCollection 2021.
4
Exploration of the Spanish Version of the Attachment Style Questionnaire: A Comparative Study between Spanish, Italian, and Japanese Culture.依恋风格问卷西班牙语版本的探索:西班牙、意大利和日本文化之间的比较研究。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):113-128. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11010010.
5
A Cross-Cultural Study on Attachment and Adjustment Difficulties in Adolescence: The Mediating Role of Self-Control in Italy, Spain, China, and Poland.跨文化研究:青少年依恋与适应困难——意大利、西班牙、中国和波兰的自我控制中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 21;18(16):8827. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168827.
6
Assessing critical dimensions of the parent-adolescent relationship from multiple perspectives: Development and validation of the Parent-Adolescent Relationship Scale (PARS).从多个视角评估亲子关系的关键维度:亲子关系量表(PARS)的编制与验证。
Psychol Assess. 2021 May;33(5):395-410. doi: 10.1037/pas0000992. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Mediating Effects of Parental Stress on Harsh Parenting and Parent-Child Relationship during Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Singapore.新加坡新冠疫情期间父母压力对严厉教养方式及亲子关系的中介作用
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(5):801-812. doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00200-1. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
Dependency in teacher-child relationships: deepening our understanding of the construct.师生关系中的依赖:深化对该结构的理解。
Attach Hum Dev. 2021 Oct;23(5):481-489. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1751986. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
Child-parent interactions in American and Turkish families: Examining measurement invariance analysis of child-parent relationship scale.美国家庭和土耳其家庭中的亲子互动:检验儿童-父母关系量表的测量不变性分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 3;15(4):e0230831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230831. eCollection 2020.
10
Father involvement, father-child relationship, and attachment in the early years.父亲的参与、父子关系和早期的依恋
Attach Hum Dev. 2020 Feb;22(1):134-138. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1589070. Epub 2019 Apr 10.