Suppr超能文献

33个临床化学实验室血清果糖胺测定的质量评估

Quality assessment of determinations of serum fructosamine in 33 clinical chemistry laboratories.

作者信息

Baker J, Metcalf P, Tatnell M, Lever M, Johnson R

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1986 Dec;32(12):2133-6.

PMID:3779977
Abstract

We investigated the analytical performance of fructosamine measurement in 33 routine clinical chemistry laboratories. We prepared 12 human control sera spanning a range of nondiabetic and diabetic fructosamine concentrations and assigned target values by using commercial reagents and a Cobas Bio centrifugal analyzer. Each control serum was analyzed by participating laboratories on two separate occasions. Averaged results were compared with target values, and systematic error was determined from slope and intercept regression coefficients. Overall, we found no significant (p greater than 0.05) slope or intercept bias, although slight nonlinearity was found with bichromatic instruments. Random error was determined from the standard error of estimate and from duplicate measurements. We found a median interlaboratory CV of 5.36% and similar analytical performance with all automated instruments used. The median random error with manual techniques was 18.1%. We conclude that fructosamine measurement as currently performed in routine laboratories is sufficiently accurate and reliable to function as an index of blood glucose control in diabetic patients.

摘要

我们调查了33个常规临床化学实验室中果糖胺检测的分析性能。我们制备了12份人对照血清,涵盖了非糖尿病和糖尿病患者不同浓度的果糖胺,并使用商业试剂和Cobas Bio离心分析仪确定目标值。各参与实验室对每份对照血清进行两次独立检测。将平均结果与目标值进行比较,并根据斜率和截距回归系数确定系统误差。总体而言,尽管在双色仪器上发现有轻微的非线性,但我们未发现显著的(p大于0.05)斜率或截距偏差。根据估计标准误差和重复测量确定随机误差。我们发现实验室间变异系数(CV)的中位数为5.36%,并且所有使用的自动化仪器的分析性能相似。手工技术的随机误差中位数为18.1%。我们得出结论,常规实验室目前进行的果糖胺检测足够准确和可靠,可作为糖尿病患者血糖控制的指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验