Suppr超能文献

中等强度他汀类药物与依折麦布联合治疗对比高强度他汀类药物单药治疗的降脂疗效:一项来自韩国的随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。

Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial From Korea.

作者信息

Choi Hyejung, Kang Si-Hyuck, Jeong Sang-Woo, Yoon Chang-Hwan, Youn Tae-Jin, Song Woo Hyuk, Jeon Dong Woon, Lim Sang Wook, Lee Jun-Hee, Cho Seong-Wook, Chae In-Ho, Kim Cheol-Ho

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Cardiology, Korea University Ansan Hsopital, Ansan, Korea.

出版信息

J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023 Sep;12(3):277-289. doi: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.277. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This phase IV, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, and parallel clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and moderate intensity rosuvastatin combination therapy to that of high intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

METHODS

This study enrolled patients with ASCVD and after a four-week screening period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (RE 10/10 group) or high-intensity rosuvastatin (R20 group) only in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the difference in the percent change in the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline to 12 weeks between two groups after treatment.

RESULTS

The study found that after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, the RE10/10 group had a greater reduction in LDL-C level compared to the R20 group (-22.9±2.6% vs. -15.6 ± 2.5% [=0.041] and -24.2±2.5% vs. -12.9±2.4% [=0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Moreover, a greater number of patients achieved the target LDL-C level of ≤70 mg/dL after the treatment period in the combination group (74.6% vs. 59.9% [=0.012] and 76.2% vs. 50.8% [<0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between two groups.

CONCLUSION

Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy had better efficacy in lowering LDL-C levels without increasing adverse effects in patients with ASCVD than high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03494270.

摘要

目的

本IV期、多中心、随机对照、开放标签的平行临床试验旨在比较依折麦布与中等强度瑞舒伐他汀联合治疗与高强度瑞舒伐他汀单药治疗对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究纳入了ASCVD患者,经过为期四周的筛查期后,患者以1:1的比例随机分配接受瑞舒伐他汀和依折麦布(RE 10/10组)或仅接受高强度瑞舒伐他汀(R20组)治疗。主要结局是两组治疗后从基线到12周时平均低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平变化百分比的差异。

结果

研究发现,治疗12周和24周后,RE10/10组的LDL-C水平降低幅度大于R20组(12周时分别为-22.9±2.6% 对比 -15.6 ± 2.5% [P=0.041],24周时分别为-24.2±2.5% 对比 -12.9±2.4% [P=0.001])。此外,联合治疗组在治疗期后达到目标LDL-C水平≤70 mg/dL的患者数量更多(12周时分别为74.6% 对比 59.9% [P=0.012],24周时分别为76.2% 对比 50.8% [P<0.001])。重要的是,两组之间总体不良事件和药物不良反应的发生率没有显著差异。

结论

对于ASCVD患者,中等强度瑞舒伐他汀与依折麦布联合治疗在降低LDL-C水平方面比高强度瑞舒伐他汀单药治疗具有更好的疗效,且不会增加不良反应。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03494270。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b5/10548190/9d1825a21dd6/jla-12-277-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验