• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的治疗管理:疗效与经济影响评估。

Therapeutic Management of LDL-C: Efficacy and Economic Impact Assessment.

作者信息

Elshafeey Abdallah

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 20;12(5):196. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050196.

DOI:10.3390/jcdd12050196
PMID:40422967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12111996/
Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the largest global disease burdens. Despite guidelines and recommendations and the proven advantages of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in preventing CVD, achieving treatment targets remains disappointing. A key barrier to optimal LLT is therapy discontinuation. To be widely adopted in clinical practice, new lipid-lowering therapies must both prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and exhibit cost effectiveness to ensure widespread utilization by patients, physicians, and insurers. While non-statin LLTs have shown cardiovascular value, their cost effectiveness is controversial. This review highlights the LLTs that are currently widely adopted and summarizes the available evidence on their cost effectiveness.

摘要

心血管疾病(CVD)是全球最大的疾病负担之一。尽管有指南和建议,且降脂疗法(LLTs)在预防心血管疾病方面已被证实具有优势,但实现治疗目标的情况仍然令人失望。最佳降脂疗法的一个关键障碍是治疗中断。要在临床实践中广泛应用,新的降脂疗法必须既能预防主要不良心血管事件(MACEs),又能展现成本效益,以确保患者、医生和保险公司广泛使用。虽然非他汀类降脂疗法已显示出心血管方面的价值,但其成本效益存在争议。本综述重点介绍了目前广泛采用的降脂疗法,并总结了其成本效益的现有证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/12111996/38f27f4228a2/jcdd-12-00196-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/12111996/38f27f4228a2/jcdd-12-00196-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4a/12111996/38f27f4228a2/jcdd-12-00196-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Therapeutic Management of LDL-C: Efficacy and Economic Impact Assessment.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的治疗管理:疗效与经济影响评估。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 20;12(5):196. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050196.
2
Cholesterol lowering therapies and achievement of targets for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetes: unmet needs in a large population of outpatients at specialist clinics.降脂治疗与 2 型糖尿病一级和二级心血管预防目标的达成:专科门诊大量门诊患者的未满足需求。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Nov 10;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01164-8.
3
Therapeutic Inertia in Dyslipidemia Management for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: Results from the Italian ITACARE-P Network.意大利ITACARE-P网络中血脂异常管理用于二级心血管预防的治疗惰性:研究结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 14;14(2):493. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020493.
4
Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with hypercholesterolemia: a retrospective analysis of a large US real-world database cohort.患有高胆固醇血症的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的临床特征和治疗模式:一项大型美国真实世界数据库队列的回顾性分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Jan;40(1):15-25. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2270901. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
5
Variation in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use in Patients With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇≥190mg/dL患者降脂治疗使用情况的差异:来自国家心血管数据注册库 - 实践创新与临床卓越注册库的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 May;11(5):e004652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004652.
6
Inclisiran: A Review in Hypercholesterolemia.英克西兰:高胆固醇血症综述
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 Mar;23(2):219-230. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00568-7. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
7
Implementation of risk-based lipid-lowering therapies in older (age ≥ 65 years) and very-old adults (age ≥ 75 years) with ischemic heart disease in the greater Salzburg region.在萨尔茨堡大区对年龄≥65岁的老年人和年龄≥75岁的高龄成年人实施基于风险的缺血性心脏病降脂治疗。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1357334. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1357334. eCollection 2024.
8
Rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in achieving lipid goals in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease in clinical practice: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study (DISCOVERY Alpha study).在临床实践中,瑞舒伐他汀与阿托伐他汀在实现心血管疾病高危患者血脂目标方面的比较:一项随机、开放标签、平行组、多中心研究(DISCOVERY Alpha研究)。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2006 Jan;67(1):21-43. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2006.02.005.
9
Healthcare Resource Utilization, Cardiovascular Event Rate and Use of Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Secondary Prevention of ASCVD in Hospitalized Patients in Italy.意大利住院患者 ASCVD 二级预防中的医疗资源利用、心血管事件发生率和降脂治疗的应用。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):314-327. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01960-y. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
10
Characteristics of Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Belgium and Current Treatment Patterns for the Management of Elevated LDL-C Levels.比利时动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的特征及升高的 LDL-C 水平的管理的当前治疗模式。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Sep;47(9):e24330. doi: 10.1002/clc.24330.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Non-statin Lipid Therapies: A Narrative Review of Evolving Strategies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.非他汀类降脂疗法的进展:心血管风险降低策略演变的叙述性综述
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s40256-025-00762-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Inclisiran for the Treatment of Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia in Singapore.英克西兰治疗新加坡原发性高胆固醇血症或混合性血脂异常的成本效益分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 May;47:101067. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101067. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Efficacy and diabetes risk of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后中等强度他汀类药物联合依折麦布与高强度他汀类药物的疗效和糖尿病风险。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Nov 5;23(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02498-3.
3
A Comparative Analysis of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-Lowering Activities of Bempedoic Acid, Inclisiran, and PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.
贝派地酸、英克西兰和前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9(PCSK9)抑制剂降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)活性的比较分析:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Sep 22;16(9):e69900. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69900. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Benefits and Risks of Antihyperlipidemic Medication in Adults with Different Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Based on the Number Needed to Treat.基于需要治疗的人数,不同 LDL 胆固醇水平的成年人使用降脂药物的获益和风险。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Jul;24(4):557-568. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00651-7. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Inclisiran in individuals with diabetes or obesity: Post hoc pooled analyses of the ORION-9, ORION-10 and ORION-11 Phase 3 randomized trials.在患有糖尿病或肥胖症的个体中使用inclisiran:ORION-9、ORION-10 和 ORION-11 三期随机临床试验的事后汇总分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Aug;26(8):3223-3237. doi: 10.1111/dom.15650. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Inclisiran administration potently and durably lowers LDL-C over an extended-term follow-up: the ORION-8 trial.依洛尤单抗治疗强效且持久降低 LDL-C:ORION-8 试验。
Cardiovasc Res. 2024 Oct 14;120(12):1400-1410. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvae109.
7
An "Inclisiran First" Strategy vs Usual Care in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.依洛尤单抗优先治疗策略对比动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的常规治疗
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 May 21;83(20):1939-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.03.382. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
8
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Low/Moderate-Intensity Statin plus Ezetimibe Combination Therapy vs. High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis.比较他汀类药物低/中强度联合依折麦布与高强度他汀类药物单药治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的安全性和疗效:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 May;24(3):419-431. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00642-8. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
Lifetime effects and cost-effectiveness of standard and higher-intensity statin therapy across population categories in the UK: a microsimulation modelling study.英国不同人群类别中标准强度和高强度他汀类药物治疗的终生影响及成本效益:一项微观模拟建模研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Mar 22;40:100887. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100887. eCollection 2024 May.
10
The combination use of inclisiran and statins versus statins alone in the treatment of dyslipidemia in mainland China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在中国大陆,英克西兰与他汀类药物联合使用和单独使用他汀类药物治疗血脂异常的成本效益分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1283922. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1283922. eCollection 2024.