Suppr超能文献

预防性使用头孢噻吩和头孢孟多在择期结肠手术中的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究的结果

Comparative efficacy of prophylactic cephalothin and cefamandole for elective colon surgery: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

Slama T G, Carey L C, Fass R J

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1979 May;137(5):593-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90029-1.

Abstract

Thirty-four patients undergoing elective colon resection or anastomosis received either intravenous cephalothin or cefamandole prophylactically and were observed for evidence of intraabdominal or wound infection, or both, postoperatively. The infection rates were 31 and 33 per cent, respectively. Infections were caused predominantly by cephalosporin resistant aerobes and anaerobes. All four bacteremias were caused by members of the B. fragilis group. The overall infection rate (32 per cent) and the frequency of anaerobic bacteremia (12 per cent) observed in this study were much higher than previously reported after cephalosporin prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.

摘要

34例行择期结肠切除或吻合术的患者预防性静脉注射头孢噻吩或头孢孟多,并在术后观察有无腹腔内感染或伤口感染证据,或两者皆有。感染率分别为31%和33%。感染主要由对头孢菌素耐药的需氧菌和厌氧菌引起。所有4例菌血症均由脆弱拟杆菌属成员引起。本研究中观察到的总体感染率(32%)和厌氧菌血症发生率(12%)远高于此前报道的结直肠手术头孢菌素预防后的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验