Suppr超能文献

拔管后无创性呼吸支持对肥胖患者术后肺部并发症的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Effect of noninvasive respiratory support after extubation on postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Anesthesiology, Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, China.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Anesthesiology, Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, China.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2023 Dec;91:111280. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111280. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Postoperative noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) has been recommended to obese patients despite the controversy about its benefit. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was used in this study to compare the effect of different methods of NRS on preventing PPCs in obese patients.

DESIGN

This study is a network meta-analysis.

SETTING

Post-anesthesia care unit and inpatient ward.

PATIENTS

20 randomized controlled trials involving 1184 obese patients were included in the final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

One of the four NRS techniques, which include continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or conventional oxygen therapy (COT), was performed after general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs, e.g., atelectasis, pneumonia, hypoxemia, and respiratory failure. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of oxygen treatment failure and anastomotic leakage, oxygenation index, and length of hospital stay (LOS). RevMan 5.3 and STATA 16.0 were used to analyze the results and any potential bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Compared with COT, BiPAP and HFNC were both effective in reducing the occurrence of postoperative atelectasis. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of other PPCs including pneumonia, hypoxemia and respiratory failure between the four NRS techniques. CPAP and HFNC were superior to other techniques in improving oxygenation and shortening LOS respectively. No differences were found in oxygen treatment failure and anastomotic leakage between the patients with different NRS. HFNC ranked the first in five of the eight outcomes (hypoxemia, respiratory failure, treatment failure, anastomotic leakage, LOS) in this review by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

CONCLUSION

Among the four postoperative NRS techniques, HFNC seems to be the optimal choice for obese patients which shows certain advantages in reducing the risk of PPCs and shortening LOS.

摘要

目的

肥胖与睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)和术后肺部并发症(PPC)的风险增加有关。尽管术后无创呼吸支持(NRS)的益处存在争议,但仍建议肥胖患者使用这种支持。本研究采用网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较了不同 NRS 方法预防肥胖患者 PPC 的效果。

设计

本研究为网络荟萃分析。

设置

麻醉后护理单元和住院病房。

患者

最终分析纳入了 20 项涉及 1184 名肥胖患者的随机对照试验。

干预措施

全身麻醉后,采用 4 种 NRS 技术中的 1 种,包括持续气道正压通气(CPAP)、双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)、高流量鼻导管(HFNC)或常规氧疗(COT)。

测量

主要结局为 PPC 发生率,如肺不张、肺炎、低氧血症和呼吸衰竭。次要结局包括氧疗失败和吻合口漏的发生率、氧合指数和住院时间(LOS)。采用 RevMan 5.3 和 STATA 16.0 分析结果和任何潜在的偏倚。

主要结果

与 COT 相比,BiPAP 和 HFNC 均能有效降低术后肺不张的发生。四种 NRS 技术之间,其他 PPC 如肺炎、低氧血症和呼吸衰竭的发生率无显著差异。CPAP 和 HFNC 分别在改善氧合和缩短 LOS 方面优于其他技术。不同 NRS 患者之间,氧疗失败和吻合口漏的发生率无差异。HFNC 在本综述的八项结局中的五项(低氧血症、呼吸衰竭、治疗失败、吻合口漏、LOS)的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)排名第一。

结论

在四种术后 NRS 技术中,HFNC 似乎是肥胖患者的最佳选择,在降低 PPC 风险和缩短 LOS 方面具有一定优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验