The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Anesthesiology, Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Department of Anesthesiology, Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, China.
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Dec;91:111280. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111280. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
Obesity is associated with an increased risk of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Postoperative noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) has been recommended to obese patients despite the controversy about its benefit. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was used in this study to compare the effect of different methods of NRS on preventing PPCs in obese patients.
This study is a network meta-analysis.
Post-anesthesia care unit and inpatient ward.
20 randomized controlled trials involving 1184 obese patients were included in the final analysis.
One of the four NRS techniques, which include continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or conventional oxygen therapy (COT), was performed after general anesthesia.
The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs, e.g., atelectasis, pneumonia, hypoxemia, and respiratory failure. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of oxygen treatment failure and anastomotic leakage, oxygenation index, and length of hospital stay (LOS). RevMan 5.3 and STATA 16.0 were used to analyze the results and any potential bias.
Compared with COT, BiPAP and HFNC were both effective in reducing the occurrence of postoperative atelectasis. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of other PPCs including pneumonia, hypoxemia and respiratory failure between the four NRS techniques. CPAP and HFNC were superior to other techniques in improving oxygenation and shortening LOS respectively. No differences were found in oxygen treatment failure and anastomotic leakage between the patients with different NRS. HFNC ranked the first in five of the eight outcomes (hypoxemia, respiratory failure, treatment failure, anastomotic leakage, LOS) in this review by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
Among the four postoperative NRS techniques, HFNC seems to be the optimal choice for obese patients which shows certain advantages in reducing the risk of PPCs and shortening LOS.
肥胖与睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)和术后肺部并发症(PPC)的风险增加有关。尽管术后无创呼吸支持(NRS)的益处存在争议,但仍建议肥胖患者使用这种支持。本研究采用网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较了不同 NRS 方法预防肥胖患者 PPC 的效果。
本研究为网络荟萃分析。
麻醉后护理单元和住院病房。
最终分析纳入了 20 项涉及 1184 名肥胖患者的随机对照试验。
全身麻醉后,采用 4 种 NRS 技术中的 1 种,包括持续气道正压通气(CPAP)、双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)、高流量鼻导管(HFNC)或常规氧疗(COT)。
主要结局为 PPC 发生率,如肺不张、肺炎、低氧血症和呼吸衰竭。次要结局包括氧疗失败和吻合口漏的发生率、氧合指数和住院时间(LOS)。采用 RevMan 5.3 和 STATA 16.0 分析结果和任何潜在的偏倚。
与 COT 相比,BiPAP 和 HFNC 均能有效降低术后肺不张的发生。四种 NRS 技术之间,其他 PPC 如肺炎、低氧血症和呼吸衰竭的发生率无显著差异。CPAP 和 HFNC 分别在改善氧合和缩短 LOS 方面优于其他技术。不同 NRS 患者之间,氧疗失败和吻合口漏的发生率无差异。HFNC 在本综述的八项结局中的五项(低氧血症、呼吸衰竭、治疗失败、吻合口漏、LOS)的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)排名第一。
在四种术后 NRS 技术中,HFNC 似乎是肥胖患者的最佳选择,在降低 PPC 风险和缩短 LOS 方面具有一定优势。