• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性和女性肺癌筛查的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes of lung cancer screening in males and females.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2023 Nov;185:107387. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107387. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107387
PMID:37801898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10788694/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study explored female and male overall mortality and lung cancer (LC) survival in two LC screening (LCS) populations, focusing on the predictive value of coronary artery calcification (CAC) at baseline low-dose computed tomography (LDCT).

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed data of 6495 heavy smokers enrolled in the MILD and BioMILD LCS trials between 2005 and 2016. The primary objective of the study was to assess sex differences in all-cause mortality and LC survival. CAC scores were automatically calculated on LDCT images by a validated artificial intelligence (AI) software. Sex differences in 12-year cause-specific mortality rates were stratified by age, pack-years and CAC score.

RESULTS

The study included 2368 females and 4127 males. The 12-year all-cause mortality rates were 4.1 % in females and 7.7 % in males (p < 0.0001), and median CAC score was 8.7 vs. 41 respectively (p < 0.0001). All-cause mortality increased with rising CAC scores (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) for both sexes. Although LC incidence was not different between the two sexes, females had lower rates of 12-year LC mortality (1.0 % vs. 1.9 %, p = 0.0052), and better LC survival from diagnosis (72.3 % vs. 51.7 %; p = 0.0005), with a similar proportion of stage I (58.1 % vs. 51.2 %, p = 0.2782).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that female LCS participants had lower rates of all-cause mortality at 12 years and better LC survival than their male counterparts, with similar LC incidence rates and stage at diagnosis. The lower CAC burden observed in women at all ages might contribute to explain their lower rates of all-cause mortality and better LC survival.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨两种肺癌筛查(LCS)人群中女性和男性的总死亡率和肺癌(LC)生存率,重点关注基线低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)时冠状动脉钙化(CAC)的预测价值。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了 2005 年至 2016 年间纳入 MILD 和 BioMILD LCS 试验的 6495 名重度吸烟者的数据。该研究的主要目的是评估两性之间全因死亡率和 LC 生存率的差异。LDCT 图像上的 CAC 评分由经过验证的人工智能(AI)软件自动计算。按年龄、吸烟包年数和 CAC 评分对 12 年病因特异性死亡率的性别差异进行分层。

结果

该研究纳入了 2368 名女性和 4127 名男性。女性的 12 年全因死亡率为 4.1%,男性为 7.7%(p<0.0001),中位 CAC 评分分别为 8.7 和 41(p<0.0001)。两种性别中,随着 CAC 评分的升高,全因死亡率均升高(对数秩检验,p<0.0001)。虽然两性的 LC 发病率无差异,但女性的 12 年 LC 死亡率较低(1.0%比 1.9%,p=0.0052),LC 从诊断开始的生存率较高(72.3%比 51.7%;p=0.0005),且相同比例的患者处于 I 期(58.1%比 51.2%,p=0.2782)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,女性 LCS 参与者在 12 年内全因死亡率较低,LC 生存率高于男性,LC 发病率和诊断时的分期相似。所有年龄段女性的 CAC 负担较低可能有助于解释其全因死亡率较低和 LC 生存率较高的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f9/10788694/c230a0d4a42c/nihms-1936525-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f9/10788694/ad88e119712e/nihms-1936525-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f9/10788694/086d2decf409/nihms-1936525-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f9/10788694/c230a0d4a42c/nihms-1936525-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f9/10788694/ad88e119712e/nihms-1936525-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f9/10788694/086d2decf409/nihms-1936525-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f9/10788694/c230a0d4a42c/nihms-1936525-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of lung cancer screening in males and females.男性和女性肺癌筛查的长期结果。
Lung Cancer. 2023 Nov;185:107387. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107387. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
Coronary Artery Calcification on Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening CT in South Korea: Visual and Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment and Association With Cardiovascular Events.韩国低剂量肺癌筛查 CT 冠状动脉钙化:基于视觉和人工智能的评估及其与心血管事件的关系。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 May;222(5):e2430852. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.30852. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
Automated Coronary Artery Calcium and Quantitative Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening: Association With Mortality, Lung Cancer Incidence, and Airflow Obstruction.肺癌筛查中自动冠状动脉钙和定量肺气肿与死亡率、肺癌发生率和气流阻塞的关系。
J Thorac Imaging. 2023 Jul 1;38(4):W52-W63. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000698. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
Fully automated calcium scoring predicts all-cause mortality at 12 years in the MILD lung cancer screening trial.在 MILD 肺癌筛查试验中,全自动钙评分可预测 12 年内的全因死亡率。
PLoS One. 2023 May 16;18(5):e0285593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285593. eCollection 2023.
5
Sex Differences in Coronary Artery and Thoracic Aorta Calcification and Their Association With Cardiovascular Mortality in Heavy Smokers.重度吸烟者冠状动脉和胸主动脉钙化的性别差异及其与心血管死亡率的关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;12(9):1808-1817. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.026. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Sex disparities in lung cancer survival rates based on screening status.基于筛查状况的肺癌生存率中的性别差异。
Lung Cancer. 2022 Sep;171:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
7
The association of coronary artery calcium score and mortality risk among smokers: The coronary artery calcium consortium.吸烟者冠状动脉钙评分与死亡风险的相关性:冠状动脉钙联合会。
Atherosclerosis. 2020 Feb;294:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
8
Combined aortic valve and coronary artery calcifications in lung cancer screening as predictors of death from cardiovascular disease.肺癌筛查中主动脉瓣和冠状动脉钙化联合作为心血管疾病死亡的预测因子。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6847-6857. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07049-4. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
9
Pulmonary emphysema and coronary artery calcifications at baseline LDCT and long-term mortality in smokers and former smokers of the ITALUNG screening trial.意大利 Lung Cancer Detection Trial(ITALUNG)筛查试验中基线 LDCT 检查的肺气肿和冠状动脉钙化与吸烟者和戒烟者的长期死亡率。
Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3115-3123. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09504-4. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Baseline computed tomography screening and blood microRNA predict lung cancer risk and define adequate intervals in the BioMILD trial.基线计算机断层扫描筛查和血液 microRNA 预测肺癌风险,并在 BioMILD 试验中确定适当的间隔。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Apr;33(4):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.人工智能在肺癌临床应用的全面综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;17(5):882. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050882.
2
Relationship of tobacco smoking to cause-specific mortality: contemporary estimates from Australia.吸烟与特定病因死亡率的关系:来自澳大利亚的当代估计
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 25;23(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03883-9.
3
Why Women Appear to Have Better Outcomes When Undergoing Screening for Lung Cancer.为什么女性在接受肺癌筛查时似乎有更好的结果。

本文引用的文献

1
Fully automated calcium scoring predicts all-cause mortality at 12 years in the MILD lung cancer screening trial.在 MILD 肺癌筛查试验中,全自动钙评分可预测 12 年内的全因死亡率。
PLoS One. 2023 May 16;18(5):e0285593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285593. eCollection 2023.
2
Automated Coronary Artery Calcium and Quantitative Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening: Association With Mortality, Lung Cancer Incidence, and Airflow Obstruction.肺癌筛查中自动冠状动脉钙和定量肺气肿与死亡率、肺癌发生率和气流阻塞的关系。
J Thorac Imaging. 2023 Jul 1;38(4):W52-W63. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000698. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
3
Cancer statistics, 2023.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jun;22(6):925-933. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-863OC.
4
The pros and cons of lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查的利弊。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):267-275. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10939-6. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
4
C-reactive protein and cancer risk: a pan-cancer study of prospective cohort and Mendelian randomization analysis.C 反应蛋白与癌症风险:前瞻性队列和孟德尔随机化分析的泛癌症研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Sep 19;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02506-x.
5
Hormones and Sex-Specific Medicine in Human Physiopathology.激素与人类生理病理学中的性别特异性医学
Biomolecules. 2022 Mar 7;12(3):413. doi: 10.3390/biom12030413.
6
C reactive protein flare predicts response to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.C 反应蛋白升高可预测非小细胞肺癌对检查点抑制剂治疗的反应。
J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004024.
7
Evolution of the global smoking epidemic over the past half century: strengthening the evidence base for policy action.过去半个世纪全球吸烟流行情况的演变:加强政策行动的证据基础
Tob Control. 2022 Mar;31(2):129-137. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056535.
8
Baseline computed tomography screening and blood microRNA predict lung cancer risk and define adequate intervals in the BioMILD trial.基线计算机断层扫描筛查和血液 microRNA 预测肺癌风险,并在 BioMILD 试验中确定适当的间隔。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Apr;33(4):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
9
Distribution, Risk Factors, and Temporal Trends for Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Analysis.肺癌发病率和死亡率的全球分析:分布、风险因素和时间趋势。
Chest. 2022 Apr;161(4):1101-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.655. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
10
Gender Differences and Immunotherapy Outcome in Advanced Lung Cancer.晚期肺癌中的性别差异与免疫治疗结果
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 4;22(21):11942. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111942.