• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的认知风险和收益:量表开发与验证

Public perceived risks and benefits of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS): Scale development and validation.

作者信息

Xu Yinghua, Liu Bingsheng, Chen Yuan, Lu Shijian

机构信息

College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.

Low Carbon Energy Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221008, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119109. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119109. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119109
PMID:37801951
Abstract

As a critical technology to mitigate climate change, the large-scale implementation of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) depends on both technological advancement and public acceptance, which is significantly influenced by the perceived risks and benefits. Existing studies, however, have yet to reach a consensus regarding the measurement of CCUS in these two aspects. To fill this gap, this paper develops and validates new scales based on four studies. Specifically, Study 1 generates the initial item pool based on a literature review and semi-structured interviews, and then invites experts to examine the content validity of these items; Study 2 identifies the dimensions and assesses the reliability and validity of the measures through an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis; Study 3 conducts a one-way ANOVA to test known-group validity; and Study 4 employed structural equation modeling to evaluate the nomological validity. The results demonstrate the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the new scales developed to measure CCUS. This study provides a valuable tool for investigating public perceptions of CCUS and can help policymakers develop future publicity strategies.

摘要

作为缓解气候变化的一项关键技术,碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的大规模实施既依赖技术进步,也取决于公众接受度,而公众接受度会受到感知风险和收益的显著影响。然而,现有研究在这两个方面对CCUS的衡量尚未达成共识。为填补这一空白,本文基于四项研究开发并验证了新的量表。具体而言,研究1基于文献综述和半结构化访谈生成初始项目池,然后邀请专家检验这些项目的内容效度;研究2通过探索性和验证性因素分析确定维度并评估测量的信度和效度;研究3进行单因素方差分析以检验已知群体效度;研究4采用结构方程模型评估理论效度。结果证明了所开发的用于测量CCUS的新量表的内部一致性、信度和结构效度。本研究为调查公众对CCUS的认知提供了一个有价值的工具,并有助于政策制定者制定未来的宣传策略。

相似文献

1
Public perceived risks and benefits of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS): Scale development and validation.公众对碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的认知风险和收益:量表开发与验证
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119109. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119109. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece.公众对碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的认知与接受度:希腊一项定性案例研究的初步结果
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jul 24;3:205. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3. eCollection 2023.
3
Carbon capture, utilization and sequestration systems design and operation optimization: Assessment and perspectives of artificial intelligence opportunities.碳捕获、利用与封存系统设计及运行优化:人工智能机遇的评估与展望
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 20;917:170085. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170085. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
4
Development and validation of safety climate scales for mobile remote workers using utility/electrical workers as exemplar.开发并验证使用电力/电工作为范例的移动远程工作者安全氛围量表。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 10.
5
An interval chance-constrained programming-based optimization model for carbon capture, utilization, and storage system planning.基于区间机会约束规划的碳捕集、利用与封存系统规划优化模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 10;772:145560. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145560. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Research progress and perspectives on carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies in China and the USA: a bibliometric analysis.中国和美国碳捕集、利用与封存(CCUS)技术的研究进展与展望:文献计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(31):76437-76454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27749-w. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
7
Validation of a brief scale to assess ambulatory patients' perceptions of reading visit notes: a scale development study.一种用于评估门诊患者对阅读就诊记录看法的简短量表的验证:一项量表开发研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):e034517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034517.
8
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
Community acceptance and social impacts of carbon capture, utilization and storage projects: A systematic meta-narrative literature review.碳捕集、利用与封存项目的社会接受度和社会影响:系统元叙事文献综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 2;17(8):e0272409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272409. eCollection 2022.
10
Development and validation of a diabetes mellitus treatment adherence scale.糖尿病治疗依从性量表的编制与验证
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;172:108629. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108629. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
CO2 geological storage site selection and long-term potential assessment framework based on TOUGH2/ECO2N.基于TOUGH2/ECO2N的二氧化碳地质封存场地选择与长期潜力评估框架
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0321715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321715. eCollection 2025.