• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece.公众对碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的认知与接受度:希腊一项定性案例研究的初步结果
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jul 24;3:205. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3. eCollection 2023.
2
Community acceptance and social impacts of carbon capture, utilization and storage projects: A systematic meta-narrative literature review.碳捕集、利用与封存项目的社会接受度和社会影响:系统元叙事文献综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 2;17(8):e0272409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272409. eCollection 2022.
3
Public perceived risks and benefits of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS): Scale development and validation.公众对碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的认知风险和收益:量表开发与验证
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119109. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119109. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Research progress and perspectives on carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies in China and the USA: a bibliometric analysis.中国和美国碳捕集、利用与封存(CCUS)技术的研究进展与展望:文献计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(31):76437-76454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27749-w. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
5
Addressing Health Equity in the Context of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration Technologies.解决碳捕集、利用和封存技术背景下的健康公平问题。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024 Jun;11(2):225-237. doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00447-6. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
6
[Under Goals of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality: Status, Problems, and Suggestions of CCUS in China].[在碳达峰碳中和目标下:中国碳捕集、利用与封存的现状、问题及建议]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Feb 8;44(2):1128-1138. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202203136.
7
Review of Policy Framework for the Development of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in China.中国碳捕集、利用与封存发展政策框架评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416853.
8
Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication.定性证据综合分析有助于我们理解人们对定向数字通信的认知和体验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 23;10(10):ED000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000141.
9
Economic feasibility and policy incentive analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in coal-fired power plants based on system dynamics.基于系统动力学的燃煤电厂碳捕集、利用与封存(CCUS)经济可行性及政策激励分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37487-37515. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24888-4. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Carbon capture, utilization and sequestration systems design and operation optimization: Assessment and perspectives of artificial intelligence opportunities.碳捕获、利用与封存系统设计及运行优化:人工智能机遇的评估与展望
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Mar 20;917:170085. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170085. Epub 2024 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Community acceptance and social impacts of carbon capture, utilization and storage projects: A systematic meta-narrative literature review.碳捕集、利用与封存项目的社会接受度和社会影响:系统元叙事文献综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 2;17(8):e0272409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272409. eCollection 2022.
2
A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation.定性研究的现场笔记指南:背景与对话。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Feb;28(3):381-388. doi: 10.1177/1049732317697102. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?代码饱和度与意义饱和度:多少次访谈才算足够?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Using Joint Interviews to Add Analytic Value.运用联合访谈增加分析价值。
Qual Health Res. 2016 Oct;26(12):1638-48. doi: 10.1177/1049732315580103. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
5
Potential occupational risk of amines in carbon capture for power generation.用于发电的碳捕集中胺类物质的潜在职业风险。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Aug;87(6):591-606. doi: 10.1007/s00420-013-0900-y. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology.告知、参与还是投入?原子、生物和纳米技术时代的科学传播。
Public Underst Sci. 2009 Sep;18(5):559-73. doi: 10.1177/0963662509104723.
7
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be?碳捕获与封存:黑色能有多绿?
Science. 2009 Sep 25;325(5948):1647-52. doi: 10.1126/science.1172246.
8
Local initiatives and adaptation to climate change.地方应对气候变化的举措与适应措施。
Disasters. 2006 Mar;30(1):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00311.x.

公众对碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的认知与接受度:希腊一项定性案例研究的初步结果

Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece.

作者信息

Stavrianakis Kostas, Nielsen Jacob, Morrison Zoe

机构信息

ABERDEEN BUSINESS SCHOOL, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2024 Jul 24;3:205. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3
PMID:39070154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11273079/
Abstract

The development and implementation of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technologies plays an increasingly important part in European Union (EU) countries' decarbonisation policies and strategies. Several studies have shown the important role social acceptance plays in determining the outcomes of CCUS projects and how social acceptance is shaped by the national and local contexts. Yet most studies on CCUS and social acceptance have focused on a few northern European countries despite the increasing numbers of CCUS projects across the European Union. This study seeks to help address this gap by conducting a case study on how local dynamics shaped people's acceptance and awareness of CCUS in two separate Greek communities. Based on semi-structured interviews with community members near a CCUS pilot plant, and a focus group with community members from a potential storage site, this single case study explores the factors and dynamics that shaped the participants' perceptions of CCUS technologies. Our findings indicate that, despite the low level of awareness of CCUS technologies, participants could draw on their situated knowledge to identify potential drawbacks with their application. We identified scepticism regarding the adoption of new technologies and the organisations involved based on past experiences, and a notable lack of provision of technology and location-specific information as well as public engagement by the project consortium. Our recommendations for future projects and community engagement include the early involvement of the public in project development, location-based transparent information, appropriate channels to facilitate knowledge exchange, and educational initiatives to build communities' capability to influence projects.

摘要

碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)技术的开发与应用在欧盟国家的脱碳政策和战略中发挥着越来越重要的作用。多项研究表明,社会接受度在决定CCUS项目的成果方面起着重要作用,以及社会接受度是如何受到国家和地方背景影响的。然而,尽管欧盟范围内的CCUS项目数量不断增加,但大多数关于CCUS与社会接受度的研究都集中在少数北欧国家。本研究旨在通过对希腊两个不同社区中地方动态如何塑造人们对CCUS的接受度和认知度进行案例研究,来填补这一空白。基于对CCUS试点工厂附近社区成员的半结构化访谈,以及与一个潜在储存地点的社区成员进行的焦点小组讨论,这个单一案例研究探讨了塑造参与者对CCUS技术认知的因素和动态。我们的研究结果表明,尽管对CCUS技术的认知水平较低,但参与者可以利用他们的实际知识来识别其应用中的潜在缺点。我们发现,基于过去的经验,人们对采用新技术和相关组织持怀疑态度,而且项目财团明显缺乏提供特定技术和地点的信息以及公众参与。我们对未来项目和社区参与的建议包括让公众尽早参与项目开发、提供基于地点的透明信息、促进知识交流的适当渠道,以及开展教育活动以增强社区影响项目的能力。