Suppr超能文献

公众对碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)的认知与接受度:希腊一项定性案例研究的初步结果

Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece.

作者信息

Stavrianakis Kostas, Nielsen Jacob, Morrison Zoe

机构信息

ABERDEEN BUSINESS SCHOOL, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2024 Jul 24;3:205. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The development and implementation of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) technologies plays an increasingly important part in European Union (EU) countries' decarbonisation policies and strategies. Several studies have shown the important role social acceptance plays in determining the outcomes of CCUS projects and how social acceptance is shaped by the national and local contexts. Yet most studies on CCUS and social acceptance have focused on a few northern European countries despite the increasing numbers of CCUS projects across the European Union. This study seeks to help address this gap by conducting a case study on how local dynamics shaped people's acceptance and awareness of CCUS in two separate Greek communities. Based on semi-structured interviews with community members near a CCUS pilot plant, and a focus group with community members from a potential storage site, this single case study explores the factors and dynamics that shaped the participants' perceptions of CCUS technologies. Our findings indicate that, despite the low level of awareness of CCUS technologies, participants could draw on their situated knowledge to identify potential drawbacks with their application. We identified scepticism regarding the adoption of new technologies and the organisations involved based on past experiences, and a notable lack of provision of technology and location-specific information as well as public engagement by the project consortium. Our recommendations for future projects and community engagement include the early involvement of the public in project development, location-based transparent information, appropriate channels to facilitate knowledge exchange, and educational initiatives to build communities' capability to influence projects.

摘要

碳捕获、利用与封存(CCUS)技术的开发与应用在欧盟国家的脱碳政策和战略中发挥着越来越重要的作用。多项研究表明,社会接受度在决定CCUS项目的成果方面起着重要作用,以及社会接受度是如何受到国家和地方背景影响的。然而,尽管欧盟范围内的CCUS项目数量不断增加,但大多数关于CCUS与社会接受度的研究都集中在少数北欧国家。本研究旨在通过对希腊两个不同社区中地方动态如何塑造人们对CCUS的接受度和认知度进行案例研究,来填补这一空白。基于对CCUS试点工厂附近社区成员的半结构化访谈,以及与一个潜在储存地点的社区成员进行的焦点小组讨论,这个单一案例研究探讨了塑造参与者对CCUS技术认知的因素和动态。我们的研究结果表明,尽管对CCUS技术的认知水平较低,但参与者可以利用他们的实际知识来识别其应用中的潜在缺点。我们发现,基于过去的经验,人们对采用新技术和相关组织持怀疑态度,而且项目财团明显缺乏提供特定技术和地点的信息以及公众参与。我们对未来项目和社区参与的建议包括让公众尽早参与项目开发、提供基于地点的透明信息、促进知识交流的适当渠道,以及开展教育活动以增强社区影响项目的能力。

相似文献

1
Public perception and acceptance of CCUS: preliminary findings of a qualitative case study in Greece.
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jul 24;3:205. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16663.3. eCollection 2023.
3
Public perceived risks and benefits of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS): Scale development and validation.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119109. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119109. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Research progress and perspectives on carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies in China and the USA: a bibliometric analysis.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(31):76437-76454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27749-w. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
5
Addressing Health Equity in the Context of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration Technologies.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024 Jun;11(2):225-237. doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00447-6. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
6
[Under Goals of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality: Status, Problems, and Suggestions of CCUS in China].
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Feb 8;44(2):1128-1138. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202203136.
7
Review of Policy Framework for the Development of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416853.
8
9
Economic feasibility and policy incentive analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in coal-fired power plants based on system dynamics.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37487-37515. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24888-4. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

2
A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Feb;28(3):381-388. doi: 10.1177/1049732317697102. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Using Joint Interviews to Add Analytic Value.
Qual Health Res. 2016 Oct;26(12):1638-48. doi: 10.1177/1049732315580103. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
5
Potential occupational risk of amines in carbon capture for power generation.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Aug;87(6):591-606. doi: 10.1007/s00420-013-0900-y. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology.
Public Underst Sci. 2009 Sep;18(5):559-73. doi: 10.1177/0963662509104723.
7
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be?
Science. 2009 Sep 25;325(5948):1647-52. doi: 10.1126/science.1172246.
8
Local initiatives and adaptation to climate change.
Disasters. 2006 Mar;30(1):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00311.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验