Suppr超能文献

A double-blind crossover study comparing betahistine and cinnarizine in the treatment of recurrent vertigo in patients in general practice.

作者信息

Deering R B, Prescott P, Simmons R L, Downey L J

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1986;10(4):209-14. doi: 10.1185/03007998609110440.

Abstract

A double-blind crossover study was carried out in general practice in 88 patients with peripheral vertigo of unknown origin to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 12 mg betahistine dihydrochloride and 15 mg cinnarizine. Patients were allocated at random to receive 2 tablets 3-times daily of one or other drug for 3 consecutive months before being crossed over to the alternative medication for a further 3 months. Severity of symptoms was assessed at 4-week intervals using the Clinical Global Impression scale and patients kept a record in a daily diary of the frequency and duration of attacks. Details were also recorded of any side-effects reported. The results were analyzed for 46 patients who completed the 6-month study period. Both drugs were shown to be equally effective in reducing the duration and severity of symptoms. Significantly fewer attacks of vertigo, however, occurred during betahistine therapy. Side-effects were the most common reason for dropping out whilst on cinnarizine (9 patients) and were complained of by 38 patients during the study (16 only when on betahistine, 19 only on cinnarizine, 3 whilst on both drugs). The most frequently reported were drowsiness or lethargy affecting 16 patients on cinnarizine and 7 on betahistine.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验