• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估身心联系:新自陈式问卷的初步心理计量学证据。

Assessment of the mind-body connection: preliminary psychometric evidence for a new self-report questionnaire.

机构信息

Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 6;11(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01302-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-023-01302-3
PMID:37803484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557351/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

While interoceptive self-report scales provide a foundation for measuring the mind-body connection, they variably consider other important factors that could influence interpretations of internal bodily sensations and perceptions related to mind-body integration. The proposed Body-Mind Connection Questionnaire (BMCQ) aimed to operationalise the notion that this construct involves three major components: (a) Interoceptive Attention, (b) Sensation-Emotion Articulation, and (c) Body-Mind Values.

METHODS

Following panel review and piloting with the target population, the developed BMCQ was evaluated in 316 participants (189 identifying as female) aged 18-50 (M=30.78), alongside established self-report measures of interoceptive sensibility, body awareness, sensory processing sensitivity, and alexithymia. We examined the BMCQ factor structure through exploratory factor analysis and analysed convergent and discriminant validity.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis supported three scales of the BMCQ, which explained 54.03% of variance. Factor loadings (>0.44) and reliability indices (0.74 to 0.85) were acceptable. Inter-scale correlations suggested that the scales are distinct but related (rs=0.38 to 0.59). BMCQ scales were supported by convergent (r=0.33 to 0.67) and discriminant evidence (rs=0.01 to 0.39, p range n.s. to <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary psychometric properties indicate that the BMCQ is multidimensional and consists of three constructs that differentially relate to theoretically associated measures. Interoceptive Attention, Sensation-Emotion Articulation, and Body-Mind Values may serve as a basis for efficiently assessing the mind-body connection more holistically, which could be useful for developing interventions aimed at enhancing mind-body integration.

摘要

目的

虽然内感受自我报告量表为测量身心连接提供了基础,但它们不同程度地考虑了其他可能影响与身心整合相关的内部身体感觉和感知解释的重要因素。拟议的身心连接问卷(BMCQ)旨在将这一概念付诸实践,即该结构涉及三个主要组成部分:(a)内感受注意力,(b)感觉-情绪表达,和(c)身心价值观。

方法

在经过专家组评审和对目标人群进行试点后,开发的 BMCQ 在 316 名参与者(189 名女性)中进行了评估,年龄在 18-50 岁之间(M=30.78),同时还评估了内感受敏感性、身体意识、感觉处理敏感性和述情障碍的既定自我报告测量。我们通过探索性因素分析来检查 BMCQ 的因子结构,并分析了收敛和判别有效性。

结果

探索性因素分析支持 BMCQ 的三个量表,这些量表解释了 54.03%的方差。因子负荷(>0.44)和可靠性指数(0.74 至 0.85)是可接受的。量表之间的相关性表明,这些量表是不同但相关的(rs=0.38 至 0.59)。BMCQ 量表得到了收敛(r=0.33 至 0.67)和判别证据(rs=0.01 至 0.39,p 范围从无统计学意义到<.05)的支持。

结论

初步心理测量学特性表明,BMCQ 是多维的,由三个与理论上相关的测量不同相关的结构组成。内感受注意力、感觉-情绪表达和身心价值观可以作为更全面地评估身心连接的基础,这对于开发旨在增强身心整合的干预措施可能很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b06b/10557351/c083e94dd5c1/40359_2023_1302_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b06b/10557351/c083e94dd5c1/40359_2023_1302_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b06b/10557351/c083e94dd5c1/40359_2023_1302_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the mind-body connection: preliminary psychometric evidence for a new self-report questionnaire.评估身心联系:新自陈式问卷的初步心理计量学证据。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 6;11(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01302-3.
2
Validation of the shortened 24-item multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (Brief MAIA-2).验证缩短版 24 项多维内感受性意识评估量表 2 版(Brief MAIA-2)。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 2;13(1):21270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48536-0.
3
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness: Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Version.内感受性觉知的多维评估:葡萄牙语版本的心理测量特性
Percept Mot Skills. 2019 Feb;126(1):87-105. doi: 10.1177/0031512518813231. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness.内感受性觉知多维评估中文版的翻译与心理测量测试
J Nurs Res. 2017 Feb;25(1):76-84. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000182.
5
The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2).多维内感受性意识评估量表 2 版(MAIA-2)。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034. eCollection 2018.
6
Are some interoceptive sensibility components more central than others? Using item pool visualisation to understand the psychometric representation of interoception.一些内脏感觉成分比其他成分更核心吗?使用项目池可视化来了解内脏感觉的心理计量学表现。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277894. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychometric Evaluation and Norms for the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) in a Clinical Eating Disorders Sample.多维内感受性意识评估量表(MAIA)在临床进食障碍样本中的心理计量学评估与常模。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017 Sep;25(5):411-416. doi: 10.1002/erv.2532. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Interoceptive awareness in a Southeastern US college sample: validation of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness - version 2.美国东南部大学生样本中的内感受意识:多维内感受意识评估 - 第 2 版的验证。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Aug 27;17(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06894-6.
9
Discrepancies between dimensions of interoception in autism: Implications for emotion and anxiety.自闭症患者内感受维度的差异:对情绪和焦虑的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2016 Feb;114:117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
10
What do measures of self-report interoception measure? Insights from a systematic review, latent factor analysis, and network approach.自我报告的内感受测量方法测量的是什么?来自系统评价、潜在因子分析和网络分析方法的见解。
Biol Psychol. 2022 Mar;169:108289. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108289. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Elucidating the role of mind-body connection profiles in emotional reactivity and regulation amongst typically developed adults.阐明身心连接模式在正常发育成年人的情绪反应性和调节中的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;13(1):916. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03083-3.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between subjective interoception and alexithymia: Implications for construct definitions and measurement.一项关于主观内感受与述情障碍关系的系统回顾和荟萃分析:对构建定义和测量的启示。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 7;19(11):e0310411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310411. eCollection 2024.
3
The role of a mindful movement-based program (Movimento Biologico) in health promotion: results of a pre-post intervention study.

本文引用的文献

1
Are some interoceptive sensibility components more central than others? Using item pool visualisation to understand the psychometric representation of interoception.一些内脏感觉成分比其他成分更核心吗?使用项目池可视化来了解内脏感觉的心理计量学表现。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277894. eCollection 2022.
2
What do measures of self-report interoception measure? Insights from a systematic review, latent factor analysis, and network approach.自我报告的内感受测量方法测量的是什么?来自系统评价、潜在因子分析和网络分析方法的见解。
Biol Psychol. 2022 Mar;169:108289. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108289. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
基于正念的运动项目(Movimento Biologico)在促进健康方面的作用:一项干预前后研究的结果。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 11;12:1372660. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1372660. eCollection 2024.
Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework.
迈向多维度框架下的内感受综合评估。
Biol Psychol. 2022 Feb;168:108262. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108262. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Clarifying the relationship between alexithymia and subjective interoception.厘清述情障碍与主观内感受之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 13;16(12):e0261126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261126. eCollection 2021.
5
Interoceptive Awareness and Suicidal Ideation in a Clinical Eating Disorder Sample: The Role of Body Trust.临床进食障碍样本中的内感受意识与自杀意念:身体信任的作用。
Behav Ther. 2021 Sep;52(5):1105-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Emotional Granularity Increases With Intensive Ambulatory Assessment: Methodological and Individual Factors Influence How Much.情绪粒度随动态密集评估而增加:方法学和个体因素影响增加程度。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 28;12:704125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704125. eCollection 2021.
7
Interoception and the origin of feelings: A new synthesis.内感受与情感的起源:一种新的综合论述。
Bioessays. 2021 Jun;43(6):e2000261. doi: 10.1002/bies.202000261. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Losing trust in body sensations: Interoceptive awareness and depression symptom severity among primary care patients.对身体感觉失去信任:初级保健患者的内感受性意识和抑郁症状严重程度。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:1210-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.092. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
9
Computational Models of Interoception and Body Regulation.内感受与身体调节的计算模型
Trends Neurosci. 2021 Jan;44(1):63-76. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.012.
10
Diseases, Disorders, and Comorbidities of Interoception.内感受的疾病、紊乱及共病。
Trends Neurosci. 2021 Jan;44(1):39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.009.