• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

补偿性健康动机与行为量表:编制、评估、心理测量学特性及初步验证。

Compensatory health motivations and behaviors scale: Development, evaluation, psychometric properties and a preliminary validation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada.

Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.

出版信息

Appetite. 2023 Dec 1;191:107075. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107075. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2023.107075
PMID:37804879
Abstract

The "Compensatory Health Beliefs" scale assesses the degree to which one believes that unhealthy behaviours can be compensated through healthier ones. However, no validated scale to assess compensatory weight-related behaviors exists. The study's objective was to develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a questionnaire measuring compensatory health motivations and behaviors (CHMB) and to assess their associations with body mass index (BMI) and psychological weight-related measures. An initial 34-item measure was constructed based on a target sample's (Study 1, n = 158) suggestions and refined based on expert feedback. The measure was then tested in a representative Canadian adult sample (N = 1400, 48.7% male). The sample was stratified by sex and age and then randomly split into two (N = 701 for exploratory factor analysis; N = 699 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) cross-validation). Fit indices, standardized Cronbach's alphas and the associations between the CHMB model with cognitive restraint, weight concerns, and BMI were assessed in multiple linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The final CHMB model (n = 17 items) consisted of four subscales: (1) motivation, (2) use on special occasions, (3) general use, (4) compensatory health beliefs. Fit indices (Goodness of Fit Index = 0.922) and Cronbach's alphas were good (α = 0.88). In multiple linear regression models, all CHMB subscales were associated with greater cognitive restraint in eating. Compensatory behavior use on special occasions was associated with greater weight concern (B = 0.12, p < .0001), while general compensatory behavior use was associated with lower weight concern (B = -0.07, p < .05). None of the subscales were associated with BMI. The validated CHMB scale allows for the assessment of compensatory health motivations and behaviors in a Canadian population. Research on whether this scale can predict weight changes and general health is needed.

摘要

“补偿性健康信念”量表评估一个人认为不健康行为可以通过更健康的行为来补偿的程度。然而,目前还没有经过验证的评估补偿性体重相关行为的量表。本研究的目的是开发(研究 1)和验证(研究 2)一种测量补偿性健康动机和行为(CHMB)的问卷,并评估它们与体重指数(BMI)和心理体重相关测量的关联。最初的 34 项措施是根据目标样本(研究 1,n=158)的建议构建的,并根据专家反馈进行了改进。然后,在一个具有代表性的加拿大成年样本(n=1400,48.7%为男性)中对该措施进行了测试。该样本按性别和年龄分层,然后随机分为两组(n=701 用于探索性因素分析;n=699 用于验证性因素分析(CFA)交叉验证)。在多个线性回归模型中,使用拟合指数、标准化克朗巴赫α和 CHMB 模型与认知约束、体重担忧和 BMI 之间的关联进行评估,同时控制年龄和性别。最终的 CHMB 模型(n=17 项)由四个分量表组成:(1)动机,(2)特殊场合使用,(3)一般使用,(4)补偿性健康信念。拟合指数(拟合优度指数=0.922)和克朗巴赫α较好(α=0.88)。在多元线性回归模型中,所有 CHMB 分量表都与更大的进食认知约束相关。特殊场合使用补偿性行为与更大的体重担忧相关(B=0.12,p<0.0001),而一般补偿性行为使用与较低的体重担忧相关(B=-0.07,p<0.05)。没有一个分量表与 BMI 相关。经过验证的 CHMB 量表可以评估加拿大人群的补偿性健康动机和行为。需要研究该量表是否可以预测体重变化和整体健康。

相似文献

1
Compensatory health motivations and behaviors scale: Development, evaluation, psychometric properties and a preliminary validation.补偿性健康动机与行为量表:编制、评估、心理测量学特性及初步验证。
Appetite. 2023 Dec 1;191:107075. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107075. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Assessing Orthorexia Nervosa: Validation of the Polish Version of the Eating Habits Questionnaire in a General Population Sample.评估饮食正常强迫症:一般人群样本中饮食习惯问卷的波兰文版验证。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):3820. doi: 10.3390/nu12123820.
3
Psychometric properties and construct validity of the Weight-Related Eating Questionnaire in a diverse population.体重相关饮食问卷在不同人群中的心理测量特性和结构效度。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Dec;19(12):2336-44. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.96. Epub 2011 May 5.
4
The Mindful Eating Behavior Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties in a Sample of Dutch Adults Aged 55 Years and Older.正念饮食行为量表:在 55 岁及以上荷兰成年人样本中的发展和心理测量特性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jul;118(7):1277-1290.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Development and validation of the mindful eating scale (mind-eat scale) in a general population.一般人群中正念饮食量表(Mind-Eat量表)的编制与验证
Appetite. 2024 Aug 1;199:107398. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107398. Epub 2024 May 6.
6
Eating behavior tendencies among Finnish adults in relation to previous weight loss attempts.芬兰成年人的饮食行为倾向与之前的减肥尝试有关。
Appetite. 2020 Jul 1;150:104650. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104650. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Psychological aspects of diet: Development and validation of three measures assessing dietary goal-desire incongruence, motivation, and satisfaction with dietary behavior.饮食的心理方面:评估饮食目标愿望不一致、动机和对饮食行为满意度的三种测量方法的开发和验证。
Appetite. 2019 Jul 1;138:223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
[Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire].[《身体形态问卷》法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82383-8.
9
The Intuitive Eating Scale-3: Development and psychometric evaluation.直观饮食量表-3:编制与心理测量学评估
Appetite. 2024 Aug 1;199:107407. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107407. Epub 2024 May 9.
10
Factorial validation of the children's eating behavior questionnaire and the association between the eating behaviors assessed and BMI Z score in Chinese preschoolers aged 2-5 years.对儿童饮食行为问卷的析因验证以及 2-5 岁中国学龄前儿童饮食行为评估与 BMI Z 评分之间的关联。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Sep 12;43(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00634-z.