Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia and the UWA Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2024 Feb;23(1):255-269. doi: 10.1007/s10237-023-01772-9. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
Cerebrovascular haemodynamics are sensitive to multiple physiological stimuli that require synergistic response to maintain adequate perfusion. Understanding haemodynamic changes within cerebral arteries is important to inform how the brain regulates perfusion; however, methods for direct measurement of cerebral haemodynamics in these environments are challenging. The aim of this study was to assess velocity waveform metrics obtained using transcranial Doppler (TCD) with flow-conserving subject-specific three-dimensional (3D) simulations using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Twelve healthy participants underwent head and neck imaging with 3 T magnetic resonance angiography. Velocity waveforms in the middle cerebral artery were measured with TCD ultrasound, while diameter and velocity were measured using duplex ultrasound in the internal carotid and vertebral arteries to calculate incoming cerebral flow at rest, during hypercapnia and exercise. CFD simulations were developed for each condition, with velocity waveform metrics extracted in the same insonation region as TCD. Exposure to stimuli induced significant changes in cardiorespiratory measures across all participants. Measured absolute TCD velocities were significantly higher than those calculated from CFD (P range < 0.001-0.004), and these data were not correlated across conditions (r range 0.030-0.377, P range 0.227-0.925). However, relative changes in systolic and time-averaged velocity from resting levels exhibited significant positive correlations when the distinct techniques were compared (r range 0.577-0.770, P range 0.003-0.049). Our data indicate that while absolute measures of cerebral velocity differ between TCD and 3D CFD simulation, physiological changes from resting levels in systolic and time-averaged velocity are significantly correlated between techniques.
脑血管血液动力学对多种生理刺激敏感,需要协同反应以维持足够的灌注。了解大脑动脉内的血液动力学变化对于了解大脑如何调节灌注非常重要;然而,在这些环境中直接测量脑血液动力学的方法具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估使用经颅多普勒 (TCD) 获得的速度波型指标,并结合使用计算流体动力学 (CFD) 的具有流量守恒的特定于主体的三维 (3D) 模拟。12 名健康参与者接受了 3T 磁共振血管造影的头颈部成像。使用 TCD 超声测量大脑中动脉的速度波型,同时使用双功超声测量颈内动脉和椎动脉的直径和速度,以计算休息、高碳酸血症和运动时的传入脑血流量。为每种情况开发了 CFD 模拟,并在与 TCD 相同的照射区域提取速度波型指标。所有参与者的心肺测量值在受到刺激后均发生显著变化。测量的 TCD 绝对速度明显高于 CFD 计算的速度 (P 范围 <0.001-0.004),并且这些数据在不同条件下没有相关性 (r 范围 0.030-0.377,P 范围 0.227-0.925)。然而,当比较两种不同技术时,休息状态下收缩期和时间平均速度的相对变化与 TCD 呈显著正相关 (r 范围 0.577-0.770,P 范围 0.003-0.049)。我们的数据表明,尽管 TCD 和 3D CFD 模拟之间的脑速度绝对值存在差异,但在收缩期和时间平均速度方面,从休息水平开始的生理变化在两种技术之间具有显著相关性。