Laboratory of Evolutionary Genetics, Division of Molecular Biology, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Faculty of Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Yeast. 2023 Nov;40(11):565-577. doi: 10.1002/yea.3899. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
Ends-out gene targeting enables the swapping of endogenous alleles with exogenous ones through homologous recombination which bears great implications both fundamental and applicable. To address the recombination mechanism(s) behind it, an experimental system was designed to distinguish between a possible (but rarely active) unilateral and the expected bilateral targeting in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in which the proportions of the two alternative genetic outcomes are conceived to mirror the probabilities of the two scenarios. The quantitative analysis showed that the bilateral targeting was expectedly predominant. However, an analogous comparative analysis on a different experimental set suggested a prevalence of unilateral targeting unveiling an uncertainty whether the extensively resected targeting modules only mimic unilateral invasion. Based on this, a comprehensive qualitative analysis was conducted revealing a single basic ends-out gene targeting mechanism composed of two intertwined pathways differing in the way how the homologous invasion is initiated and/or the production of the intermediates is conducted. This study suggests that bilateral targeting lowers mistargeting plausibly by limiting strand assimilation, unlike unilateral targeting which may initiate extensive strand assimilation producing intermediates capable of supporting multiple genetic outcomes which leads to mistargeting. Some of these outcomes can also be produced by mimicking unilateral invasion.
末端出基因打靶通过同源重组实现内源等位基因与外源等位基因的交换,具有重要的基础和应用意义。为了解析其背后的重组机制,设计了一个实验系统,以区分酵母酿酒酵母中可能存在的(但很少活跃的)单侧和预期的双侧靶向,其中两种替代遗传结果的比例被认为反映了两种情况的概率。定量分析表明,双侧靶向是预期的主要形式。然而,对不同实验集的类似比较分析表明,单侧靶向更为常见,这揭示了一个不确定性,即广泛切除的靶向模块是否仅模拟单侧入侵。基于此,进行了全面的定性分析,揭示了一种由两个相互交织的途径组成的单一基本末端出基因靶向机制,这两个途径在同源入侵的起始方式和/或中间产物的产生方式上存在差异。本研究表明,双侧靶向通过限制链同化来降低靶向错误的可能性,而单侧靶向可能会启动广泛的链同化,产生能够支持多种遗传结果的中间产物,从而导致靶向错误。其中一些结果也可以通过模拟单侧入侵来产生。