Young Hayden A, Turnbull Jocelyn C, Keller Elizabeth D, Domingues Lucas Gatti, Parry-Thompson Jeremy, Hilton Timothy W, Brailsford Gordon W, Gray Sally, Moss Rowena C, Mikaloff-Fletcher Sara
GNS Science, Lower Hutt 5010, New Zealand.
CIRES, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Nov 27;381(2261):20220204. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0204. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
As part of the CarbonWatch-NZ research programme, air samples were collected at 28 sites around Auckland, New Zealand, to determine the atmospheric ratio () of excess (local enhancement over background) carbon monoxide to fossil CO (COff). Sites were categorized into seven types (background, forest, industrial, suburban, urban, downwind and motorway) to observe around Auckland. Motorway flasks observed of 14 ± 1 ppb ppm and were used to evaluate traffic . The similarity between suburban (14 ± 1 ppb ppm) and traffic suggests that traffic dominates suburban COff emissions during daytime hours, the period of flask collection. The lower urban (11 ± 1 ppb ppm) suggests that urban COff emissions are comprised of more than just traffic, with contributions from residential, commercial and industrial sources, all with a lower than traffic. Finally, the downwind sites were believed to best represent for Auckland City overall (11 ± 1 ppb ppm). We demonstrate that the initial discrepancy between the downwind and Auckland's estimated daytime inventory (15 ppb ppm) can be attributed to an overestimation in inventory traffic CO emissions. After revision based on our observed motorway , the revised inventory (12 ppb ppm) is consistent with our observations. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Radiocarbon in the Anthropocene'.
作为“碳观察-新西兰”研究项目的一部分,在新西兰奥克兰周围的28个地点采集了空气样本,以确定过量(相对于背景的本地增强)一氧化碳与化石一氧化碳(COff)的大气比率()。这些地点被分为七种类型(背景、森林、工业、郊区、城市、下风区和高速公路),以观察奥克兰周围的情况。高速公路采样瓶观测到的比率为14±1 ppb/ppm,用于评估交通排放。郊区(14±1 ppb/ppm)与交通排放的相似性表明,在白天采样瓶采集期间,交通排放主导了郊区的COff排放。城市排放比率较低(11±1 ppb/ppm),这表明城市的COff排放不仅仅由交通排放构成,还包括住宅、商业和工业来源的排放,所有这些来源的排放比率都低于交通排放。最后,下风区的地点被认为最能代表奥克兰市的总体排放比率(11±1 ppb/ppm)。我们证明,下风区排放比率与奥克兰估计的白天排放清单(15 ppb/ppm)之间最初的差异可归因于清单中交通一氧化碳排放的高估。根据我们观测到的高速公路排放比率进行修订后,修订后的清单(12 ppb/ppm)与我们的观测结果一致。本文是西奥·墨菲会议特刊“人类世中的放射性碳”的一部分。