• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Risk factors for massive hemorrhage after radical nephrectomy and removal of venous tumor thrombus].[根治性肾切除术及静脉瘤栓切除术后大出血的危险因素]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Oct 18;55(5):825-832. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.05.008.
2
[Single-center study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with Mayo 0-2 level inferior vena cava thrombectomy].[腹腔镜根治性肾切除术联合Mayo 0-2级下腔静脉血栓切除术的单中心研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Dec 18;50(6):1053-1056.
3
Laparoscopic conversion to open surgery in radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy: causal analysis, clinical characteristics, and treatment strategies.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术和肿瘤栓子切除术中转开放手术:病因分析、临床特征和治疗策略。
BMC Surg. 2020 Aug 13;20(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00845-1.
4
Bland thrombus association with tumour thrombus in renal cell carcinoma: analysis of surgical significance and role of inferior vena caval interruption.肾细胞癌中肿瘤栓子与无病变血栓的关系:分析手术意义及下腔静脉阻断的作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E449-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11128.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
5
Body mass index as an independent risk factor for inferior vena cava resection during thrombectomy for venous tumor thrombus of renal cell carcinoma.体重指数作为肾细胞癌静脉瘤栓血栓切除术时切除下腔静脉的独立危险因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan 15;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1560-5.
6
[Clinical effects of transesophageal echocardiography in different surgical methods for nephrectomy combined with Mayo Ⅲ-Ⅳ vena tumor thrombectomy].[经食管超声心动图在肾切除术联合MayoⅢ-Ⅳ级腔静脉瘤栓切除术不同手术方式中的临床效果]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Dec 18;56(4):631-635. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.04.014.
7
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumor Thrombus.细胞减灭性肾切除术治疗伴有静脉瘤栓的肾细胞癌。
J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
Surgical complexity and prognostic outcome of small volume renal cell carcinoma with high-level venous tumor thrombus and large volume renal cell carcinoma with low-level thrombus.小体积伴高水平静脉瘤栓肾细胞癌和大体积伴低水平瘤栓肾细胞癌的手术复杂性和预后结局。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Aug 5;132(15):1780-1787. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000352.
9
[Clinical diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus].肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤合并下腔静脉瘤栓的临床诊断与治疗
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Dec 18;56(4):617-623. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.04.012.
10
En bloc laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy: A single-institution experience.整块腹腔镜下根治性肾切除术联合下腔静脉取栓术:单中心经验。
Int J Urol. 2019 Mar;26(3):363-368. doi: 10.1111/iju.13873. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Nomograms for Predicting Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Venous Tumor Thrombus: A Population-Based Study.预测肾细胞癌合并静脉瘤栓患者总生存和癌症特异性生存的列线图:一项基于人群的研究
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 8;9:929885. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.929885. eCollection 2022.
2
Renal cell carcinoma: an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment.肾细胞癌:流行病学、诊断和治疗概述。
G Ital Nefrol. 2022 Jun 20;39(3):2022-vol3.
3
Completely laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy and infrahepatic tumor thrombectomy: Comparison of surgical complexity and prognosis.完全腹腔镜与开放根治性肾切除术联合肝下肿瘤血栓切除术:手术复杂性和预后的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Apr;44(4):641-648. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
A modified surgical technique of shortening renal ischemia time in left renal cancer patients with Mayo level II-IV tumor thrombus.一种用于缩短梅奥分级II-IV级肿瘤血栓的左肾癌患者肾缺血时间的改良手术技术。
BMC Surg. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00769-w.
5
Peking University Third Hospital score: a comprehensive system to predict intra-operative blood loss in radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy.北京大学第三医院评分:一种预测根治性肾切除术和血栓切除术术中失血的综合系统。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 May 20;133(10):1166-1174. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000799.
6
Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Operator Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Mayo Clinic Level I-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy Associated with Renal Carcinoma: A Study of 120 Cases at a Single Center.机器人辅助 Mayo 诊所 I-IV 级下腔静脉血栓切除术与肾癌相关的术者学习曲线累积和分析:单中心 120 例研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Feb 28;26:e922987. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922987.
7
Comparison of Open and Robot Assisted Radical Nephrectomy With Level I and II Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: The Mayo Clinic Experience.开放手术与机器人辅助根治性肾切除术治疗 I 级和 II 级下腔静脉肿瘤栓:梅奥诊所经验。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Robot-assisted Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Initial Series with Step-by-step Procedures and 1-yr Outcomes.机器人辅助 III-IV 级下腔静脉血栓切除术:分步手术及 1 年结果的初步系列研究。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Tumor thrombus: incidence, imaging, prognosis and treatment.肿瘤血栓:发病率、影像学、预后及治疗
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Dec;7(Suppl 3):S165-S177. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.09.16.
10
Impact of trauma centre designation level on outcomes following hemorrhagic shock: a multicentre cohort study.创伤中心指定级别对失血性休克后结局的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
Can J Surg. 2017 Feb;60(1):45-52. doi: 10.1503/cjs.009916.

[根治性肾切除术及静脉瘤栓切除术后大出血的危险因素]

[Risk factors for massive hemorrhage after radical nephrectomy and removal of venous tumor thrombus].

作者信息

Lan Dong, Liu Zhuo, Li Yu Xuan, Wang Guo Liang, Tian Xiao Jun, Ma Lu Lin, Zhang Shu Dong, Zhang Hong Xian

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

Department of Urology, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guang'an 638500, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Oct 18;55(5):825-832. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.05.008.

DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.05.008
PMID:37807735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10560906/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and analyze the risk factors of massive hemorrhage in patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumor thrombus undergoing radical nephrectomy and removal of venous tumor thrombus.

METHODS

From January 2014 to June 2020, 241 patients with renal cancer and tumor thrombus in a single center of urology at Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy and removal of venous tumor thrombus. The relevant preoperative indicators, intraoperative conditions, and postoperative data were statistically analyzed by using statistical software of SPSS 18.0. The main end point of the study was intraoperative bleeding volume greater than 2 000 mL. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relevant influencing factors. First, single factor Logistic regression was used for preliminary screening of influencing factors, and variables with single factor Logistic regression analysis < 0.05 were included in multivariate Logistic regression. In all statistical analyses, < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among the 241 patients included, there were 60 cases of massive hemorrhage, 48 males and 12 females, with a median age of 62 years. The number of non-massive hemorrhage was 181. There were 136 males and 45 females, with a median age of 59 years. Univariate analysis showed that the clinical symptoms (both systemic and local symptoms, 2.794, 95% 1.087-7.181, =0.033), surgical approach (open surgery, 9.365, 95% 4.447-19.72, < 0.001), Mayo grade (Mayo 3-4, 5.257, 95% 2.806-10.886, < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (ASA level 3, 2.842, 95% 1.338-6.036, =0.007), preoperative hemoglobin ( 0.978, 95% 0.965-0.991, =0.001), preoperative platelet count ( 0.996, 95% 0.992-1.000, =0.037), maximum tumor thrombus width ( 1.061, 95% 1.033-1.091, < 0.001), Complicated with bland thrombus ( 4.493, 95% 2.264-8.915, < 0.001), adrenalectomy ( 3.101, 95% 1.614-5.958, =0.001), segmental resection of the inferior vena cava ( 2.857, 95% 1.395-5.852, =0.004). There was a statistically significant difference in these aspects( < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that there was a statistically significant difference in surgical approach (open surgery, 6.730, 95% 2.947-15.368; < 0.001), Mayo grade (Mayo 3-4, 2.294, 95% 1.064-4.948, =0.034), Complicated with bland thrombus ( 3.236, 95% 1.492-7.020, =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Combining the results of univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis, the surgical approach, Mayo grade, and tumor thrombus combined with conventional thrombus were associated risk factors for massive hemorrhage during surgery for renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus. Patients who undergo open surgery, high Mayo grade, and tumor thrombus combined with conventional thrombus are at a relatively higher risk of massive hemorrhage.

摘要

目的

探讨并分析接受根治性肾切除术及静脉瘤栓切除术的肾细胞癌合并静脉瘤栓患者发生大出血的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2020年6月北京大学第三医院泌尿外科单中心收治的241例肾癌合并瘤栓患者。所有患者均接受根治性肾切除术及静脉瘤栓切除术。采用SPSS 18.0统计软件对相关术前指标、术中情况及术后数据进行统计学分析。研究的主要终点为术中出血量大于2000 mL。采用Logistic回归分析确定相关影响因素。首先,采用单因素Logistic回归对影响因素进行初步筛选,将单因素Logistic回归分析P<0.05的变量纳入多因素Logistic回归。在所有统计分析中,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

纳入的241例患者中,大出血60例,男性48例,女性12例,中位年龄62岁。非大出血患者181例,男性136例,女性45例,中位年龄59岁。单因素分析显示,临床症状(全身及局部症状,P=2.794,95%CI 1.087-7.181,P=0.033)、手术方式(开放手术,P=9.365, 95%CI 4.447-19.72,P<0.001)、梅奥分级(梅奥3-4级,P=5.257, 95%CI 2.806-10.886,P<0.001)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分(ASA 3级,P=2.842, 95%CI 1.338-6.036,P=0.007)、术前血红蛋白(P=0.978, 95%CI 0.965-0.991,P=0.001)、术前血小板计数(P=0.996, 95%CI 0.992-1.000,P=0.037)、最大瘤栓宽度(P=1.061, 95%CI 1.033-1.091,P<0.001)、合并白血栓(P=4.493, 95%CI 2.264-8.915,P<0.001)、肾上腺切除术(P=3.101, 95%CI 1.614-5.958,P=0.001)、下腔静脉节段性切除术(P=2.857, 95%CI 1.395-5.852,P=0.004)。这些方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,手术方式(开放手术,P=6.730, 95%CI 2.947-15.368;P<0.001)、梅奥分级(梅奥3-4级,P=2.294, 95%CI 1.064-4.948,P=0.034)、合并白血栓(P=3.236, 95%CI 1.492-7.020,P=0.003)差异有统计学意义。

结论

结合单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析结果,手术方式、梅奥分级以及瘤栓合并陈旧血栓是肾细胞癌合并瘤栓手术中发生大出血相关的危险因素。接受开放手术、梅奥分级高以及瘤栓合并陈旧血栓的患者发生大出血的风险相对较高。