• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助 Mayo 诊所 I-IV 级下腔静脉血栓切除术与肾癌相关的术者学习曲线累积和分析:单中心 120 例研究。

Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Operator Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Mayo Clinic Level I-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy Associated with Renal Carcinoma: A Study of 120 Cases at a Single Center.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).

Department of Urology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2020 Feb 28;26:e922987. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922987.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.922987
PMID:32107362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7063847/
Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to use cumulative sum analysis of the operator learning curve for robot-assisted Mayo Clinic level I-IV inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy associated with renal carcinoma, and describes the development of an optimized operative procedure at a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study included 120 patients with Mayo Clinic level I-IV IVC thrombus who underwent robotic surgery between 2013 and 2018. Points in the learning curve were identified using cumulative sum analysis, and their impact was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Perioperative indicators analyzed included operative time, estimated blood loss, early complications, and the 90-day progression rate. RESULTS Cumulative sum analysis identified three phases in the learning curve of robot-assisted IVC thrombectomy. The median operative time decreased from 265 min (range, 212-401 min) to 207 min (range, 146-276 min) (p=0.003), the median estimated blood loss decreased from 775 ml (range, 413-1500 ml) to 300 ml (range, 163-813 ml) (p=0.006), and the early complication rate decreased from 52.5% to 15.0% (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that for an initial 40 cases and a further 80 cases, the learning phase, the affected side, the Mayo Clinic level, and the surgical method were independent factors that affected operative time, estimated blood loss, and the rate of early complications. CONCLUSIONS Experience from an initial 40 cases and a further 80 cases of Mayo Clinic level I-IV IVC thrombectomy associated with renal carcinoma were found to provide acceptable surgical and clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在利用累积和分析(CUSUM)对机器人辅助梅奥诊所 I-IV 级下腔静脉(IVC)血栓切除术与肾癌相关的术者学习曲线进行分析,并描述在单中心发展优化的手术操作程序。

材料和方法

回顾性研究纳入了 2013 年至 2018 年间接受机器人手术的 120 例梅奥诊所 I-IV 级 IVC 血栓患者。使用累积和分析识别学习曲线中的关键点,并通过多元回归分析评估其影响。分析的围手术期指标包括手术时间、估计出血量、早期并发症和 90 天进展率。

结果

CUSUM 分析确定了机器人辅助 IVC 血栓切除术学习曲线的三个阶段。手术时间中位数从 265 分钟(范围 212-401 分钟)降至 207 分钟(范围 146-276 分钟)(p=0.003),估计出血量中位数从 775 毫升(范围 413-1500 毫升)降至 300 毫升(范围 163-813 毫升)(p=0.006),早期并发症率从 52.5%降至 15.0%(p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,对于最初的 40 例和进一步的 80 例患者,学习阶段、受累侧、梅奥诊所分级和手术方式是影响手术时间、估计出血量和早期并发症率的独立因素。

结论

在处理梅奥诊所 I-IV 级 IVC 血栓与肾癌相关的前 40 例和进一步的 80 例病例中,我们发现经验能够提供可接受的手术和临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21dc/7063847/7a5ddb2dfb31/medscimonit-26-e922987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21dc/7063847/4c249f3207bf/medscimonit-26-e922987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21dc/7063847/7a5ddb2dfb31/medscimonit-26-e922987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21dc/7063847/4c249f3207bf/medscimonit-26-e922987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21dc/7063847/7a5ddb2dfb31/medscimonit-26-e922987-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Operator Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Mayo Clinic Level I-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy Associated with Renal Carcinoma: A Study of 120 Cases at a Single Center.机器人辅助 Mayo 诊所 I-IV 级下腔静脉血栓切除术与肾癌相关的术者学习曲线累积和分析:单中心 120 例研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Feb 28;26:e922987. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922987.
2
Robot-assisted Level II-III Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: Step-by-Step Technique and 1-Year Outcomes.机器人辅助下腔静脉II-III级肿瘤血栓切除术:分步技术及1年随访结果
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.066. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
3
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Different Sides Require Different Techniques.机器人辅助腹腔镜下下腔静脉血栓切除术:不同部位需要不同的技术。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
Robot-assisted Cavectomy Versus Thrombectomy for Level II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Decision-making Scheme and Multi-institutional Analysis.机器人辅助腔静脉切除术与血栓切除术治疗 II 级下腔静脉血栓:决策方案和多机构分析。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):592-602. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Robot-assisted Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: First or Second Porta Hepatis as an Important Boundary Landmark.机器人辅助肝后下腔静脉血栓切除术:第一肝门或第二肝门作为重要的边界标志。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in detecting wall invasion and differentiating bland from tumor thrombus during robot-assisted inferior vena cava thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma.机器人辅助下下腔静脉癌栓取栓术中超声造影对肾细胞癌癌栓壁侵犯及良恶性的鉴别诊断价值
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0265-x.
7
Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术和下腔静脉取栓术治疗肾细胞癌。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
A modified sequential vascular control strategy in robot-assisted level III-IV inferior vena cava thrombectomy: initial series mimicking the open 'milking' technique principle.机器人辅助下 III-IV 级下腔静脉血栓切除术的改良序贯血管控制策略:模仿开放“挤奶”技术原理的初步系列。
BJU Int. 2020 Oct;126(4):447-456. doi: 10.1111/bju.15094. Epub 2020 May 16.
9
Robot Assisted Surgery of the Vena Cava: Perioperative Outcomes, Technique, and Lessons Learned at The Mayo Clinic.机器人辅助腔静脉手术:梅奥诊所的围手术期结果、技术和经验教训。
J Endourol. 2019 Dec;33(12):1009-1016. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0429.
10
Robot-assisted Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Initial Series with Step-by-step Procedures and 1-yr Outcomes.机器人辅助 III-IV 级下腔静脉血栓切除术:分步手术及 1 年结果的初步系列研究。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Intravenous Tumor Thrombus: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Approaches.用于治疗伴有静脉瘤栓的肾细胞癌的微创外科技术:腹腔镜和机器人辅助手术方法的系统评价
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 28;32(5):256. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050256.
2
[Risk factors for massive hemorrhage after radical nephrectomy and removal of venous tumor thrombus].[根治性肾切除术及静脉瘤栓切除术后大出血的危险因素]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Oct 18;55(5):825-832. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.05.008.
3
A Decade of Robotic-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Curve in Robot-assisted Kidney Transplantation: Results from the European Robotic Urological Society Working Group.机器人辅助肾移植的学习曲线:来自欧洲机器人泌尿外科协会工作组的结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Aug;78(2):239-247. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
2
Comparison of Open and Robot Assisted Radical Nephrectomy With Level I and II Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: The Mayo Clinic Experience.开放手术与机器人辅助根治性肾切除术治疗 I 级和 II 级下腔静脉肿瘤栓:梅奥诊所经验。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Robot-assisted Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Initial Series with Step-by-step Procedures and 1-yr Outcomes.
机器人辅助根治性肾切除术联合下腔静脉取栓术治疗 10 年:一项围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2022 Sep;208(3):542-560. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002829. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Step-by-step and orderly lowering of the height of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus is the key to robot-assisted thrombectomy for Mayo III/IV tumor thrombus.逐步有序降低下腔静脉瘤栓高度是机器人辅助Mayo III/IV 肿瘤栓子切除术的关键。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09235-7.
机器人辅助 III-IV 级下腔静脉血栓切除术:分步手术及 1 年结果的初步系列研究。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Quantitative Assessment of the Learning Curve for Robotic Thyroid Surgery.机器人甲状腺手术学习曲线的定量评估
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 22;8(3):402. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030402.
5
Robot-assisted renal surgery: current status and future directions.机器人辅助肾手术:现状与未来方向
Robot Surg. 2016 May 24;3:1-12. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S71328. eCollection 2016.
6
The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.机器人辅助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术外科医生的学习曲线:在高容量胰腺中心的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2927-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6595-0. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.机器人手术学习曲线的系统评价:范围和异质性。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):353-365. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Defining the learning curve in robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.定义机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的学习曲线。
Surgery. 2019 Feb;165(2):450-454. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
Robot-assisted Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: First or Second Porta Hepatis as an Important Boundary Landmark.机器人辅助肝后下腔静脉血栓切除术:第一肝门或第二肝门作为重要的边界标志。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
Robotic versus Open Level I-II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Matched Group Comparative Analysis.机器人与开放一级-II 下腔静脉血栓切除术:匹配组比较分析。
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1241-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.094. Epub 2017 Jul 8.