Francis Marion University, Florence, South Carolina, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Dec;72(3-4):258-270. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12702. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
In this virtual special issue (VSI) we curate and reflect upon 22 articles on formal youth mentoring previously published in the American Journal of Community Psychology (AJCP). First, we provide historical context and highlight AJCP's 2002 special issue on mentoring, which played an important role in establishing youth mentoring as a vibrant area of research. Next, we review and discuss findings from subsequent AJCP studies in three interrelated lines of inquiry: (1) the importance of facilitating high-quality mentoring relationships; (2) associations among youth's presenting needs, relationship quality, and outcomes; and (3) program practices leading to stronger, more impactful relationships. Throughout, we highlight and expand upon critical commentary from AJCP contributors, calling on the field to move away from paternalistic models that overly localize risk with youth and families without interrogating structural oppression. Our recommendations include: (1) centering critical consciousness, racial equity, and social justice in program curricula and mentor trainings; (2) respectfully engaging grassroots programs developed for and by communities of color that are underrepresented in research; (3) making meaningful efforts to recruit mentors from marginalized communities and removing barriers to their participation; and (4) examining youth's racial, ethnic, and other areas of identity development processes during mentoring.
在这个虚拟特刊(VSI)中,我们精心挑选并反思了之前发表在《美国社区心理学杂志》(AJCP)上的 22 篇关于正式青年指导的文章。首先,我们提供了历史背景,并强调了 AJCP 于 2002 年关于指导的特刊,该特刊在确立青年指导作为一个充满活力的研究领域方面发挥了重要作用。接下来,我们回顾并讨论了随后 AJCP 研究在三个相互关联的探究领域中的发现:(1)促进高质量指导关系的重要性;(2)青年提出的需求、关系质量和结果之间的关联;以及(3)导致更强有力、更有影响力关系的计划实践。在整个过程中,我们突出并扩展了 AJCP 贡献者的批判性评论,呼吁该领域摆脱过度将风险本地化给青年和家庭而不质疑结构性压迫的家长式模式。我们的建议包括:(1)在项目课程和导师培训中以批判意识、公平和社会正义为中心;(2)尊重和参与由有色人种社区为这些社区开发的基层项目,这些项目在研究中代表性不足;(3)做出有意义的努力从边缘化社区招募导师,并消除他们参与的障碍;以及(4)在指导过程中考察青年的种族、民族和其他身份发展过程。