• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭迁移事件后非迁移人群中的艾滋病毒发病率:乌干达一项基于人群的纵向研究

HIV incidence among non-migrating persons following a household migration event: a population-based, longitudinal study in Uganda.

作者信息

Young R, Ssekasanvu J, Kagaayi J, Ssekubugu R, Kigozi G, Reynolds S J, Wawer M J, Nonyane B A S, Nantume Betty, Quinn Thomas C, Tobian Aaron A R, Santelli John, Chang L W, Kennedy C E, Paina L, Anglewicz P A, Serwadda D, Nalugoda F, Grabowski M K

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Sep 25:2023.09.23.23295865. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.23.23295865.

DOI:10.1101/2023.09.23.23295865
PMID:37808671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557776/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of migration on HIV risk among non-migrating household members is poorly understood. We measured HIV incidence among non-migrants living in households with and without migrants in Uganda.

METHODS

We used four survey rounds of data collected from July 2011-May 2018 from non-migrant participants aged 15-49 years in the Rakai Community Cohort Study, an open, population-based cohort. Non-migrants were individuals with no evidence of migration between surveys or at the prior survey. The primary exposure, household migration, was assessed using census data and defined as ≥1 household member migrating in or out of the house from another community between surveys (∼18 months). Incident HIV cases tested positive following a negative result at the preceding visit. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations and robust standard errors. Analyses were stratified by gender, migration into or out of the household, and the relationship between non-migrants and migrants (i.e., any household migration, spouse, child).

FINDINGS

Overall, 11,318 non-migrants (5,674 women) were followed for 37,320 person-years. 28% (6,059/21,370) of non-migrant person-visits had recent migration into or out of the household, and 240 HIV incident cases were identified in non-migrating household members. Overall, non-migrants in migrant households were not at greater risk of acquiring HIV. However, HIV incidence among men was significantly higher when the spouse had recently migrated in (adjIRR:2·12;95%CI:1·05-4·27) or out (adjIRR:4·01;95%CI:2·16-7·44) compared to men with no spousal migration. Women with in- and out-migrant spouses also had higher HIV incidence, but results were not statistically significant.

INTERPRETATION

HIV incidence is higher among non-migrating persons with migrant spouses, especially men. Targeted HIV testing and prevention interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis could be considered for those with migrant spouses.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT

We searched PubMed for studies focused on HIV acquisition, prevalence or sexual behaviors among non-migrants who lived with migrants in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using search terms such as "HIV", "Emigration and Immigration", "family", "spouses", "household", "parents", and "children". Despite high levels of migration and an established association with HIV risk in SSA, there is limited data on the broader societal impacts of migration on HIV acquisition risk among non-migrant populations directly impacted by it.There has been only one published study that has previously evaluated impact of migration on HIV incidence among non-migrating persons in sub-Saharan Africa. This study, which exclusively assessed spousal migration, was conducted in Tanzania more than two decades earlier prior to HIV treatment availability and found that non-migrant men with long-term mobile partners were more than four times as likely to acquire HIV compared to men who had partners that were residents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of non-spousal migration, including any household migration and child migration, on HIV incidence among non-migrants.

ADDED VALUE OF THIS STUDY

In this study, we used data from the Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS), a population-based HIV surveillance cohort to measure the impact of migration on HIV incidence for non-migrant household members. The RCCS captures HIV incident events through regular, repeat HIV testing of participants and migration events through household censuses. Our study adds to the current literature by examining the general effect of migration in the household on HIV incidence in addition to child, and spousal migration. Using data from over 11,000 non-migrant individuals, we found that spousal, but not other types of household migration, substantially increased HIV risk among non-migrants, especially among men. Taken together, our results suggest that spousal migration may be associated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition in the period surrounding and immediately after spousal migration.

IMPLICATIONS OF ALL THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE

Our findings suggest that spousal migration in or out of the household is associated with greater HIV incidence. Targeted HIV testing and prevention interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis could be considered for men with migrant spouses.

摘要

背景

移民对非移民家庭成员感染艾滋病毒风险的影响了解甚少。我们在乌干达测量了生活在有移民和无移民家庭中的非移民的艾滋病毒发病率。

方法

我们使用了从2011年7月至2018年5月从拉凯社区队列研究中15 - 49岁的非移民参与者收集的四轮调查数据,这是一个基于人群的开放队列。非移民是指在各次调查之间或上次调查时无移民迹象的个体。主要暴露因素家庭移民,使用人口普查数据进行评估,定义为在各次调查之间(约18个月)有≥1名家庭成员从另一个社区迁入或迁出该房屋。艾滋病毒感染病例是在上次检测呈阴性后此次检测呈阳性的。发病率比(IRR)及其95%置信区间使用泊松回归和广义估计方程以及稳健标准误进行估计。分析按性别、家庭成员迁入或迁出、非移民与移民之间的关系(即任何家庭移民、配偶、子女)进行分层。

研究结果

总体而言,11318名非移民(5674名女性)被随访了37320人年。28%(6059/21370)的非移民人次有近期家庭成员迁入或迁出,在非移民家庭成员中发现了240例艾滋病毒感染病例。总体而言,移民家庭中的非移民感染艾滋病毒的风险并不更高。然而,与配偶无迁移的男性相比,配偶近期迁入(调整后发病率比:2.12;95%置信区间:1.05 - 4.27)或迁出(调整后发病率比:4.01;95%置信区间:2.16 - 7.44)的男性艾滋病毒发病率显著更高。有迁入和迁出配偶的女性艾滋病毒发病率也较高,但结果无统计学意义。

解读

有移民配偶的非移民人群中艾滋病毒发病率较高,尤其是男性。对于有移民配偶的人群,可考虑进行针对性的艾滋病毒检测和预防干预,如暴露前预防。

资助

美国国立卫生研究院、美国疾病控制与预防中心。

研究背景

我们在PubMed上搜索了专注于撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)与移民共同生活的非移民中艾滋病毒感染、流行率或性行为的研究,使用了“艾滋病毒”、“移民与移出”、“家庭”、“配偶”、“家庭户”、“父母”和“子女”等搜索词。尽管在撒哈拉以南非洲移民率很高且与艾滋病毒风险存在既定关联,但关于移民对直接受其影响的非移民人群感染艾滋病毒风险的更广泛社会影响的数据有限。此前仅有一项已发表的研究评估了移民对撒哈拉以南非洲非移民人群艾滋病毒发病率的影响。这项专门评估配偶迁移的研究是在二十多年前坦桑尼亚艾滋病毒治疗可用之前进行的,发现有长期流动配偶的非移民男性感染艾滋病毒的可能性是有常住配偶男性的四倍多。据我们所知,这是第一项研究非配偶迁移(包括任何家庭迁移和子女迁移)对非移民艾滋病毒发病率影响的研究。

本研究的附加价值

在本研究中,我们使用了来自拉凯社区队列研究(RCCS)的数据,这是一个基于人群的艾滋病毒监测队列,以测量移民对非移民家庭成员艾滋病毒发病率的影响。RCCS通过对参与者定期重复进行艾滋病毒检测来捕获艾滋病毒感染事件,并通过家庭人口普查来捕获移民事件。我们的研究除了研究子女和配偶迁移外,还研究了家庭中移民对艾滋病毒发病率的总体影响,从而丰富了当前的文献。利用来自11000多名非移民个体的数据,我们发现配偶迁移而非其他类型的家庭迁移会大幅增加非移民感染艾滋病毒的风险,尤其是男性。综上所述,我们的结果表明配偶迁移可能在配偶迁移前后及刚迁移后这段时间内与感染艾滋病毒风险增加有关。

所有现有证据的启示

我们的研究结果表明家庭成员迁入或迁出与更高的艾滋病毒发病率相关。对于有移民配偶的男性,可考虑进行针对性的艾滋病毒检测和预防干预,如暴露前预防。

相似文献

1
HIV incidence among non-migrating persons following a household migration event: a population-based, longitudinal study in Uganda.家庭迁移事件后非迁移人群中的艾滋病毒发病率:乌干达一项基于人群的纵向研究
medRxiv. 2023 Sep 25:2023.09.23.23295865. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.23.23295865.
2
HIV incidence among non-migrating persons following a household migration event in Uganda.乌干达发生家庭迁移事件后,非移民人群中的艾滋病毒感染率。
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 14;53(5). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae118.
3
HIV and viremia prevalence in non-migrating members of migrant households in Rakai region, Uganda: A cross-sectional population-based study.乌干达拉凯地区移民家庭非移民成员中的艾滋病毒和病毒血症患病率:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
medRxiv. 2023 Dec 10:2023.12.08.23299745. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.08.23299745.
4
Migration and risk of HIV acquisition in Rakai, Uganda: a population-based cohort study.在乌干达拉凯的迁移与 HIV 感染风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet HIV. 2018 Apr;5(4):e181-e189. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30009-2. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
The intersection between migration, HIV, and contraceptive use in Uganda: a cross-sectional population-based study.乌干达的移民、艾滋病毒和避孕措施使用之间的交叉点:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 May 17;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01796-z.
7
Prevalence of Untreated HIV and Associated Risk Behaviors Among the Sexual Partners of Recent Migrants and Long-term Residents in Rakai, Uganda.乌干达拉凯地区近期移民和长期居民性伴侣中未经治疗的 HIV 流行率及相关风险行为。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Nov 1;88(3):243-251. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002764.
8
Prevalence and circumstances of forced sex and post-migration HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan African migrant women in France: an analysis of the ANRS-PARCOURS retrospective population-based study.撒哈拉以南非洲移民女性在法国的被迫性行为和移民后 HIV 感染的流行情况和环境:对 ANRS-PARCOURS 回顾性基于人群的研究的分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jan;3(1):e16-e23. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30211-6. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
9
Male migration and risky sexual behavior in rural India: is the place of origin critical for HIV prevention programs?印度农村男性迁移与高危性行为:对于艾滋病预防规划而言,原籍地是否至关重要?
BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 29;11 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S6-S6.
10
Household wealth and HIV incidence over time, rural Uganda, 1994-2018.家庭财富与 HIV 发病率随时间变化的关系,乌干达农村地区,1994-2018 年。
AIDS. 2021 Sep 1;35(11):1835-1843. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002989.