Newman S P, Pellow P G, Clarke S W
Eur J Respir Dis. 1986 Sep;69(3):160-8.
Although aerosol antibiotics have been used successfully to treat respiratory tract infection in patients with cystic fibrosis, little information exists concerning the correct nebulisation technique for antibiotic solutions. We have measured aerosol output, droplet size and nebulisation time for 1 g carbenicillin (Pyopen, Beechams) diluted with 3 ml or 4 ml water for injection and delivered from six brands of jet nebuliser (Cirrus, DeVilbiss, Inspiron, Turret, Unicorn and Upmist). Three relatively weak compressors (Medix Traveller, Medic-Aid PortaNeb 50 and Inspiron) and three more powerful compressors (Medix WOBL, Medix Maxi mark I and Gast) were used as driving sources. Maxi and Gast compressors increased the quantity of "respirable" (less than 5 micron diameter) carbenicillin aerosol, and reduced nebulisation times; with the weaker compressors, nebulisation times (up to 50 min) were unacceptably long. The Turret nebuliser proved to be the most efficient, but several other brands would also be acceptable if used with a powerful compressor.
虽然雾化抗生素已成功用于治疗囊性纤维化患者的呼吸道感染,但关于抗生素溶液正确的雾化技术的信息却很少。我们已测量了用3毫升或4毫升注射用水稀释的1克羧苄青霉素(派罗欣,比彻姆公司)从六种品牌的喷射雾化器(Cirrus、德维比斯、Inspiron、Turret、独角兽和Upmist)喷出的雾化量、液滴大小和雾化时间。使用了三台相对较弱的压缩机(Medix Traveller、Medic - Aid PortaNeb 50和Inspiron)和三台功率更大的压缩机(Medix WOBL、Medix Maxi mark I和盖斯特)作为驱动源。Maxi和盖斯特压缩机增加了“可吸入”(直径小于5微米)的羧苄青霉素雾化量,并缩短了雾化时间;使用较弱的压缩机时,雾化时间(长达50分钟)长得令人无法接受。事实证明,Turret雾化器效率最高,但如果与功率强大的压缩机一起使用,其他几个品牌的雾化器也可以接受。