Guo Qingchun, Gao Yuxuan, Song Chao, Zhang Xinhou, Wang Guoxiang
School of Environment Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China.
State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Ecol Evol. 2023 Oct 6;13(10):e10583. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10583. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Light intensity is a determinant for submerged macrophytes. Little is known about their molecular responses to low-light exposure, despite more informative and responsive than morphological traits. For erect-type submerged macrophytes, the stem is more crucial relative to the leaf in acclimation to low-light stress, but receives less attention. We determined morphological and stem transcriptomic responses/acclimations of to extremely and mildly low light (7.2 and 36 μmol photons m s, respectively), that is, EL and ML, with the radiation intensity of 180 μmol photons m s as the control. Low-light exposure continued for 9 days, followed by a 7-day recovery phase (180 μmol photons m s). At the exposure phase, the low-light treatments, in particular the EL, decreased the relative growth ratio, but induced greater height and longer stem internode distance and epidermal cell. Such responses/acclimations continued into the recovery phase, despite more or less changes in the magnitude. Transcriptome showed that the photosynthetic system was inhibited at the exposure phase, but the macrophyte adjusted hormone synthesis relating to cell division and elongation. Moreover, the EL activated cell stress responses such as DNA repair. Following light recovery, the macrophyte exhibited a strong-light response, although energy metabolism enhanced. Especially, the EL enriched the pathways relating to anthocyanin synthesis at such phase, indicating an activation of photoprotective mechanism. Our findings suggest that negative influences of low light occur at both low-light exposure and recovery phases, but submerged macrophytes would acclimate to light environments. Transcriptome can show molecular basis of plant responses/acclimations, including but not limited to morphology. This study establishes a bridge connecting morphological and molecular responses/acclimations.
光照强度是沉水植物的一个决定性因素。尽管沉水植物的分子响应比形态特征更具信息性和响应性,但人们对它们在低光照条件下的分子反应却知之甚少。对于直立型沉水植物而言,在适应低光照胁迫方面,茎相对于叶更为关键,但却较少受到关注。我们以180 μmol光子·m⁻²·s⁻¹的辐射强度为对照,测定了[具体植物名称未给出]对极弱光和弱光(分别为7.2和36 μmol光子·m⁻²·s⁻¹),即极弱光(EL)和弱光(ML)的形态和茎转录组反应/适应情况。低光照处理持续9天,随后是7天的恢复期(180 μmol光子·m⁻²·s⁻¹)。在暴露阶段,低光照处理,尤其是极弱光处理,降低了相对生长率,但诱导了更高的株高、更长的茎节间距离和更大的表皮细胞。尽管这些反应/适应的幅度或多或少有所变化,但它们持续到了恢复期。转录组分析表明,在暴露阶段光合系统受到抑制,但沉水植物调整了与细胞分裂和伸长相关的激素合成。此外,极弱光激活了诸如DNA修复等细胞应激反应。光照恢复后,尽管能量代谢增强,但沉水植物表现出强光反应。特别是,极弱光在该阶段丰富了与花青素合成相关的途径,表明光保护机制被激活。我们的研究结果表明,低光照的负面影响在低光照暴露和恢复阶段都会出现,但沉水植物能够适应光照环境。转录组可以显示植物反应/适应的分子基础,包括但不限于形态。本研究建立了一座连接形态和分子反应/适应的桥梁。