• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于液化天然气冷能的发电系统(火用)损分析

Exergy destruction analysis of a power generation system utilizing the cold energy of LNG.

作者信息

Wan Teng, Bai Bin, Zhou Weihong

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, 114051, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Aug 24;9(9):e19393. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19393. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19393
PMID:37809443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10558343/
Abstract

The purpose of this research is in-depth understanding of the internal causes of exergy destruction in various parts of the system and to identify potential improvements for the components. The focus is on a combined cycle power generation system that utilizes the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and direct expansion cycle (DEC). To investigate the primary sources of exergy destruction in each component, advanced exergy analysis (AEA) is utilized. The result demonstrates that the net out power of the proposed system can reach 106.64 kW with energy efficiency of 11.22%, and exergy efficiency of 21.40%. The heat exchanger is identified as the primary contributor to exergy destruction, constituting 81.70% of the total ratio. Specifically, the condenser exhibits the highest exergy destruction ratio at 59.82%, indicating a need for prioritized optimization efforts. The findings of AEA reveal that the primary source of component irreversibility stems from the endogenous part. This shows that, while most exergy destruction is unavoidable, there remains room for system improvement. Regarding the turbine, its exergy destruction is primarily attributed to inefficiencies, leading to irreversibility. Nevertheless, there is exergy destruction that may be avoidable and can be reduced by 25.93 kW, which is 2.5 times greater than that of the heat exchanger. This finding underscores the high potential for improvement in ORC and DEC turbines, making them a priority for optimization efforts.

摘要

本研究的目的是深入了解系统各部分火用损失的内在原因,并确定组件的潜在改进方向。重点是一个利用有机朗肯循环(ORC)和直接膨胀循环(DEC)的联合循环发电系统。为了研究各组件中火用损失的主要来源,采用了先进火用分析(AEA)。结果表明,所提出系统的净输出功率可达106.64千瓦,能量效率为11.22%,火用效率为21.40%。热交换器被确定为火用损失的主要贡献者,占总比例的81.70%。具体而言,冷凝器的火用损失率最高,为59.82%,这表明需要优先进行优化。AEA的结果表明,组件不可逆性的主要来源是内源性部分。这表明,虽然大部分火用损失是不可避免的,但系统仍有改进空间。对于涡轮机,其火用损失主要归因于效率低下,导致不可逆性。然而,存在一些可以避免的火用损失,可减少25.93千瓦,这比热交换器的可避免火用损失大2.5倍。这一发现突出了ORC和DEC涡轮机的高改进潜力,使其成为优化工作的重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/94b87a386e14/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/37b9cc22816e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/0083e7eca9ac/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/6c985d11a9d1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/139f8407fe7e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/7c285912e86f/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/463917aaa9df/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/ab31196ca8f5/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/e3c48eb50ba9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/5576118580c2/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/94b87a386e14/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/37b9cc22816e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/0083e7eca9ac/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/6c985d11a9d1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/139f8407fe7e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/7c285912e86f/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/463917aaa9df/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/ab31196ca8f5/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/e3c48eb50ba9/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/5576118580c2/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da1/10558343/94b87a386e14/gr10.jpg

相似文献

1
Exergy destruction analysis of a power generation system utilizing the cold energy of LNG.基于液化天然气冷能的发电系统(火用)损分析
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 24;9(9):e19393. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19393. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine-Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant with Liquefied Natural Gas as Heat Sink.以液化天然气为热沉的固体氧化物燃料电池-燃气轮机-有机朗肯循环发电厂的能量与㶲分析
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jun 22;20(7):484. doi: 10.3390/e20070484.
3
Enhancing thermodynamic performance with an advanced combined power and refrigeration cycle with dual LNG cold energy utilization.通过先进的联合动力与制冷循环及双LNG冷能利用提升热力性能。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 3;10(15):e35748. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35748. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
4
Advanced Exergy-Based Analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Waste Heat Recovery.基于高级㶲分析的有机朗肯循环(ORC)余热回收研究
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Oct 23;25(10):1475. doi: 10.3390/e25101475.
5
Engine Load Effects on the Energy and Exergy Performance of a Medium Cycle/Organic Rankine Cycle for Exhaust Waste Heat Recovery.发动机负荷对用于废气余热回收的中循环/有机朗肯循环的能量和㶲性能的影响。
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Feb 21;20(2):137. doi: 10.3390/e20020137.
6
Technical assessment of novel organic Rankine cycle driven cascade refrigeration system using environmental friendly refrigerants: 4E and optimization approaches.新型有机朗肯循环驱动级联制冷系统的技术评估:环保制冷剂 4E 及优化方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(12):35096-35114. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24608-y. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
Exergetic Analysis, Optimization and Comparison of LNG Cold Exergy Recovery Systems for Transportation.用于运输的液化天然气冷㶲回收系统的㶲分析、优化与比较
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jan 13;20(1):59. doi: 10.3390/e20010059.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Integrated Waste Heat Utilization Systems for Coal-Fired Power Plants Based on In-Depth Boiler-Turbine Integration and Organic Rankine Cycle.基于深度锅炉-汽轮机集成与有机朗肯循环的燃煤电厂综合余热利用系统对比评估
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jan 29;20(2):89. doi: 10.3390/e20020089.
9
Energy, exergy, and environmental assessment of a small-scale solar organic Rankine cycle using different organic fluids.使用不同有机流体的小型太阳能有机朗肯循环的能量、㶲及环境评估
Heliyon. 2021 Sep 10;7(9):e07947. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07947. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Comparison of exergy and exergy economic evaluation of different geothermal cogeneration systems for optimal waste energy recovery.不同地热联产系统的火用及火用经济评价比较,以实现最佳废热回收。
Chemosphere. 2023 Oct;339:139586. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139586. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Robust control of neutral delayed systems using descriptive discretized Lyapunov function method: Design and stability analysis.基于描述离散Lyapunov函数法的中立型时滞系统鲁棒控制:设计与稳定性分析
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 19;10(4):e26648. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26648. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of ORC configurations via Taguchi-Grey Relational Methods.基于田口-灰色关联法的有机朗肯循环(ORC)系统配置的(火用)经济分析与多目标优化
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e15007. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15007. eCollection 2023 Apr.