Department of Neurologic Surgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa , Florida , USA.
Division of Neurosurgery, Fleming Neuroscience Institute, Allentown , Pennsylvania , USA.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2024 Feb 1;26(2):196-202. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000934. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
The transorbital approach varies by the extent of bony removal and the target. Orbital rim-sparing transorbital approach with removal of only the orbit's posterior wall provides optimal cosmetic results, without the need for reconstruction. The size of this corridor, limited by the medial globe retraction, has not yet been defined and is difficult to determine in cadavers because of postmortem tissue desiccation. By using patient-specific models in virtual reality, precise areas and degrees of surgical freedom (AOF and DOF, respectively) provided by globe retraction were calculated. These measurements define a potential maximum safe AOF and DOF, as well as the globe retraction, needed to achieve a sufficient surgical corridor.
Using a virtual reality system, transorbital rim-preserving craniectomies were performed. The axial and sagittal DOF as well as AOF were calculated lateral to the globe, limited by the orbital rim and globe, with an anterior clinoid target. The DOFs and AOFs were calculated for each degree of medial globe retraction and analyzed using paired t tests.
With only 5 mm of retraction, the AOF was 886 mm 2 , while at 10 mm, the AOF was 1546 mm 2 . This increase between 5 and 10 mm allowed for the largest increase in surgical working corridor ( P = .02). At 15 mm of retraction (previously studied point at which intraocular pressure raises), the AOF averaged 2189 mm 2 and axial DOF averaged 23.1°. Eighteen DOF (a previously studied point needed to achieve sufficient working space for 2 instruments) was achieved at 11 mm on average, generating 1675 mm 2 AOF.
Globe retraction of 11 mm is needed to achieve sufficient DOF for 2 surgical instruments, and 15 mm of retraction is a conservative limit that provides comparable AOFs with similar cranial approaches.
经眶入路因骨切除范围和目标不同而有所差异。仅切除眶后壁的眶缘保留经眶入路可提供最佳的美容效果,而无需重建。由于死后组织干燥,该通道的大小(由内侧眼球回缩限制)尚未确定,在尸体中也难以确定。通过在虚拟现实中使用患者特定模型,计算出眼球回缩提供的精确手术自由度(分别为 AOF 和 DOF)的区域和程度。这些测量定义了潜在的最大安全 AOF 和 DOF,以及为获得足够手术通道所需的眼球回缩量。
使用虚拟现实系统进行眶缘保留开颅术。在以眶缘和眼球为限、以前床突为目标的外侧,计算轴向和矢状 DOF 以及 AOF。计算了每种程度的内侧眼球回缩的 DOF 和 AOF,并使用配对 t 检验进行了分析。
仅 5mm 回缩时,AOF 为 886mm²,而 10mm 时 AOF 为 1546mm²。这种 5mm 到 10mm 的增加允许最大程度地增加手术工作通道(P=.02)。在 15mm 回缩时(之前研究的眼压升高点),AOF 平均为 2189mm²,轴向 DOF 平均为 23.1°。18 个 DOF(之前研究的达到足够工作空间所需的点数以容纳 2 个器械)平均在 11mm 时实现,产生 1675mm²的 AOF。
需要 11mm 的眼球回缩才能获得足够的 DOF 以容纳 2 个手术器械,15mm 的回缩是一个保守的限制,它提供了与类似颅入路相似的 AOF。