Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom; and.
Leeds United Football Club, Leeds, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Dec 1;37(12):2417-2422. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004574. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
Lunn, DE, Nicholson, G, Cooke, M, Crespo, R, Robinson, T, Price, RJ, and Walker, J. Discrete hamstring: quadriceps strength ratios do not represent angle-specific ratios in Premier League soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): 2417-2422, 2023-This study compared angle-specific hamstring:quadriceps (H:Q) ratios with their discrete counterparts during strength testing in professional male soccer players. Twenty-seven professional English Premier League soccer players were recruited for this study (age: 22 ± 4 years; stature: 1.81 ± 0.08 m; body mass: 74.7 ± 6.5 kg). Isokinetic testing of the knee flexors and extensors was conducted concentrically at two angular velocities (60° and 240°·s -1 ) and eccentrically (for the knee flexors only) at 30°·s -1 . Conventional H:Q ratio was calculated as the ratio between peak joint moment in the flexors and extensors at 60°·s -1 . Functional H:Q ratio was calculated as the peak joint moment in the flexors during the eccentric condition and the extensors at 240°·s -1 . Discrete conventional and functional H:Q ratios were 0.56 ± 0.06 and 1.28 ± 0.22, respectively. The residual differences between discrete values and angle-specific residual values were 13.60 ± 6.56% when normalized to the magnitude of the discrete value. For the functional ratios, the normalized residual was 21.72 ± 5.61%. Therefore, neither discrete ratio was representative of angle-specific ratios, although the conventional ratio had lower error overall. Therefore, practitioners should consider H:Q ratio throughout the full isokinetic range of motion, not just the discrete ratio calculated from peak joint moments, when designing and implementing training programs or monitoring injury risk, recovery from injury, and readiness to return to play.
伦恩、德、尼科尔斯、库克、克雷斯波、罗宾逊、普赖斯和沃克。离散腘绳肌:英超足球运动员的股四头肌力量比并不代表角度特异性比。J 力量与条件研究 37(12):2417-2422,2023-本研究比较了职业男足球运动员在力量测试中特定角度腘绳肌:股四头肌(H:Q)比与离散对应物的角度特异性比。招募了 27 名职业英超足球运动员进行这项研究(年龄:22 ± 4 岁;身高:1.81 ± 0.08 m;体重:74.7 ± 6.5 kg)。对膝关节屈肌和伸肌进行了等速测试,在两个角速度(60°和 240°·s -1 )和偏心(仅膝关节屈肌)下以 30°·s -1 进行。常规 H:Q 比是通过 60°·s -1 时屈肌和伸肌的峰值关节力矩计算得出的。功能 H:Q 比是通过偏心状态下的屈肌和 240°·s -1 时的伸肌的峰值关节力矩计算得出的。离散常规和功能 H:Q 比分别为 0.56 ± 0.06 和 1.28 ± 0.22。离散值与角度特异性残余值之间的剩余差异在归一化到离散值的大小后为 13.60 ± 6.56%。对于功能比,归一化残差为 21.72 ± 5.61%。因此,离散值都不能代表角度特异性比,尽管常规比总体误差较小。因此,从业者在设计和实施训练计划或监测受伤风险、受伤恢复和重返比赛准备时,应考虑整个等速运动范围内的 H:Q 比,而不仅仅是从关节力矩峰值计算出的离散比。