Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division and the Center for Translational Lung Biology / Lung Biology Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 10;18(10):e0289923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289923. eCollection 2023.
The gut microbiome is believed to contribute to bloodstream infection (BSI) via translocation of dominant gut bacteria in vulnerable patient populations. However, conclusively linking gut and blood organisms requires stringent approaches to establish strain-level identity.
We enrolled a convenience cohort of critically ill patients and investigated 86 bloodstream infection episodes that occurred in 57 patients. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was used to define constituents of their gut microbiomes, and whole genome sequencing and assembly was done on 23 unique bloodstream isolates that were available from 21 patients. Whole genome sequences were downloaded from public databases and used to establish sequence-identity distribution and define thresholds for unrelated genomes of BSI species. Gut microbiome reads were then aligned to whole genome sequences of the cognate bloodstream isolate and unrelated database isolates to assess identity.
Gut microbiome constituents matching the bloodstream infection species were present in half of BSI episodes, and represented >30% relative abundance of gut sequences in 10% of episodes. Among the 23 unique bloodstream organisms that were available for whole genome sequencing, 14 were present in gut at the species level. Sequence alignment applying defined thresholds for identity revealed that 6 met criteria for identical strains in blood and gut, but 8 did not. Sequence identity between BSI isolates and gut microbiome reads was more likely when the species was present at higher relative abundance in gut.
In assessing potential gut source for BSI, stringent sequence-based approaches are essential to determine if organisms responsible for BSI are identical to those in gut: of 14 evaluable patients in which the same species was present in both sites, they were identical in 6/14, but were non-identical in 8/14 and thus inconsistent with gut source. This report demonstrates application of sequencing as a key tool to investigate infection tracking within patients.
人们认为肠道微生物组通过在易感染人群中转移优势肠道细菌而导致血流感染(BSI)。然而,要明确将肠道和血液中的细菌联系起来,需要严格的方法来建立菌株水平的同一性。
我们招募了一组便利的危重病患者队列,并调查了 57 名患者中发生的 86 例血流感染事件。 shotgun 宏基因组测序用于定义其肠道微生物组的组成,对来自 21 名患者的 23 个独特的血流分离株进行了全基因组测序和组装。全基因组序列从公共数据库下载,并用于建立序列同一性分布,并定义 BSI 种无关基因组的阈值。然后将肠道微生物组读数与相关血流分离株和无关数据库分离株的全基因组序列进行比对,以评估同一性。
与血流感染物种匹配的肠道微生物组成分存在于一半的 BSI 发作中,在 10%的发作中代表肠道序列的相对丰度超过 30%。在可用于全基因组测序的 23 个独特的血流生物中,有 14 个在物种水平上存在于肠道中。应用同一性定义阈值的序列比对显示,在血液和肠道中有 6 个符合相同菌株的标准,但有 8 个不符合。当物种在肠道中相对丰度较高时,BSI 分离株与肠道微生物组读数之间的序列同一性更有可能。
在评估 BSI 的潜在肠道来源时,严格的基于序列的方法对于确定导致 BSI 的生物体是否与肠道中的生物体相同至关重要:在 14 名可评估的患者中,同一物种同时存在于两个部位,其中 6/14 相同,8/14 不同,因此与肠道来源不一致。本报告展示了测序作为一种关键工具在调查患者内感染追踪中的应用。