Lu Xianying, Yang Jing, Bai Dingxi, Wu Chenxi, Cai Mingjin, Wang Wei, He Jiali, Gong Xiaoyan, Gao Jing, Hou Chaoming
From the School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr 1;103(4):293-301. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002348. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different exercises for improving fatigue in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PEDro, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang data, CBM, and CINAHL were conducted from the establishment of the database to July 2023. We independently screened the literature, evaluated the quality, analyzed the data using Stata 15.0, and performed subgroup analysis on intervention time and exercise intervention adherence.
Twenty-three studies were analyzed, with 1867 patients and nine interventions. Based on the surface under cumulative ranking curves and pairwise comparisons effects, overall long-term, short-term, and exercise intervention adherence >90% effects have all presented that during dialysis aerobic-resistance combined exercise was ranked as the most effective compared with routine care (surface under cumulative ranking curves = 83.9%, standardized mean difference = -1.45, 95% CI = -2.23 to -0.67; surface under cumulative ranking curves = 85.9%, standardized mean difference = -1.38, 95% CI = -2.24 to -0.52; surface under cumulative ranking curves = 86.6%, standardized mean difference = -1.54, 95% CI = -2.58 to -0.49; surface under cumulative ranking curves = 83.6%, standardized mean difference = -1.45, 95% CI = -2.25 to -0.66, respectively), followed by interdialytic period muscle relaxation exercise, interdialytic period aerobic-resistance combined exercise, interdialytic period aerobic exercise, and interdialytic period Baduanjin.
Dialysis aerobic-resistance combined exercise may be considered in practice when resources allow. However, high-quality, multicenter, and large-sample randomized control trials must further verify this conclusion.
本研究旨在评估不同运动方式对改善维持性血液透析患者疲劳状况的效果。
检索了从数据库建立至2023年7月的PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane、PEDro、中国知网(CNKI)、维普资讯(VIP)、万方数据、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)。我们独立筛选文献、评估质量,使用Stata 15.0分析数据,并对干预时间和运动干预依从性进行亚组分析。
分析了23项研究,涉及1867例患者和9种干预措施。基于累积排序曲线下面积和两两比较效应,总体长期、短期以及运动干预依从性>90%的效应均显示,在透析期间,有氧-抗阻联合运动与常规护理相比被列为最有效的运动方式(累积排序曲线下面积=83.9%,标准化均差=-1.45,95%置信区间=-2.23至-0.67;累积排序曲线下面积=85.9%,标准化均差=-1.38,95%置信区间=-2.24至-0.52;累积排序曲线下面积=86.6%,标准化均差=-1.54,95%置信区间=-2.58至-0.49;累积排序曲线下面积=83.6%,标准化均差=-1.45,95%置信区间=-2.25至-0.66),其次是透析间期肌肉放松运动、透析间期有氧-抗阻联合运动、透析间期有氧运动和透析间期八段锦。
在资源允许的情况下,实践中可考虑采用透析有氧-抗阻联合运动。然而,必须通过高质量、多中心、大样本的随机对照试验进一步验证这一结论。