• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水牙线对炎症和菌斑临床参数的疗效:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。

Efficacy of water flossing on clinical parameters of inflammation and plaque: A four-week randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Academic Center for Dentistry, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL

All Sum Research Center, Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, CA.

出版信息

J Dent Hyg. 2023 Oct;97(5):166-186.

PMID:37816609
Abstract

The primary prevention of periodontitis is controlling gingivitis daily. The study objective was to compare the efficacy of a pulsating water flosser to a pulsating water flosser infused with air microbubbles on clinical signs of inflammation and plaque. One hundred and five participants were enrolled in this single-blind, single-center, parallel, four-week, IRB/IEC-approved clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: water flosser (WF) plus manual toothbrush, water flosser infused with microbubbles of air (MBWF) plus manual toothbrush, or dental floss (DF) plus manual toothbrush. Bleeding on probing (BOP), Modified Gingival Index (MGI), and Rustogi Modification Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) scores were recorded at baseline, 2-weeks, and 4-weeks. All participants completed the study (n=105). All groups showed a statistically significant reduction for BOP, MGI, and RMNPI at 4-weeks (<0.05, except DF marginal RMNPI). The WF group showed a statistically significant greater reduction in whole mouth BOP (0.41) compared to MBWF (0.32) and DF (0.19). This was also true for MGI (0.37, 0.30, and 0.20, respectively) and RMNPI (0.13, 0.11, and 0.06, respectively) (<0.05 for all comparisons). No adverse events were reported. This study demonstrates that a manual toothbrush and water flosser, with or without microbubbles, is an effective oral care regimen for controlling gingivitis over four weeks.

摘要

牙周炎的主要预防措施是日常控制牙龈炎。本研究的目的是比较脉动水流洁牙器与充注空气微气泡的脉动水流洁牙器在炎症和牙菌斑临床体征方面的疗效。105 名参与者参加了这项单盲、单中心、平行、四周、IRB/IEC 批准的临床试验。参与者被随机分配到以下三组之一:水流洁牙器(WF)加手动牙刷、充注空气微气泡的水流洁牙器(MBWF)加手动牙刷或牙线(DF)加手动牙刷。在基线、2 周和 4 周时记录探诊出血(BOP)、改良牙龈指数(MGI)和 Rustogi 海军改良菌斑指数(RMNPI)评分。所有参与者均完成了研究(n=105)。所有组在 4 周时 BOP、MGI 和 RMNPI 均显示出统计学显著降低(<0.05,DF 边际 RMNPI 除外)。WF 组的全口 BOP 减少(0.41)明显大于 MBWF(0.32)和 DF(0.19)。MGI(0.37、0.30 和 0.20)和 RMNPI(0.13、0.11 和 0.06)也是如此(所有比较均<0.05)。未报告不良事件。本研究表明,手动牙刷和水流洁牙器,无论是否充注微气泡,都是控制牙龈炎的有效口腔护理方案,可在四周内有效控制牙龈炎。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of water flossing on clinical parameters of inflammation and plaque: A four-week randomized controlled trial.水牙线对炎症和菌斑临床参数的疗效:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。
J Dent Hyg. 2023 Oct;97(5):166-186.
2
Efficacy of water flossing on clinical parameters of inflammation and plaque: A 4-week randomized controlled trial.水牙线对炎症和菌斑临床参数的疗效:为期 4 周的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Nov;21(4):659-668. doi: 10.1111/idh.12770. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
3
Effectiveness of a sonic-flosser toothbrush with different size brush heads and manual toothbrush plus dental floss on plaque, gingival bleeding and inflammation in adults with naturally occurring gingivitis: A 4-week randomized controlled trial.不同尺寸刷头的声波牙刷与手动牙刷加牙线对患有自然发生牙龈炎的成年人的菌斑、牙龈出血和炎症的效果:一项为期 4 周的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Aug;21(3):624-633. doi: 10.1111/idh.12675. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Evaluation of the Addition of a Water Flosser to Manual Brushing on Gingival Health.评估在手动刷牙基础上添加水牙线对牙龈健康的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2018 Dec;29(4):81-86.
5
Efficacy of Two Interdental Cleaning Devices on Clinical Signs of Inflammation: A Four-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.两种牙间隙清洁装置对炎症临床体征的疗效:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。
J Clin Dent. 2015;26(2):55-60.
6
The addition of a water flosser to power tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and plaque.在电动牙刷的基础上增加水牙线:对出血、牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(2):57-63.
7
Efficacy of the Use of a Water Flosser in Addition to an Electric Toothbrush on Clinical Signs of Inflammation: 4-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.除电动牙刷外使用水牙线对炎症临床体征的疗效:4周随机对照试验
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020 Mar 1;41(3):170-177. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
8
Comparison of Water Flosser and Interdental Brush on Reduction of Gingival Bleeding and Plaque: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.水牙线与牙间刷在减少牙龈出血和牙菌斑方面的比较:一项随机对照试验性研究
J Clin Dent. 2016 Jun;27(2):61-65.
9
Clinical Efficacy of the Oral Health System by Fresh Health Inc. in Adults on Gingivitis and Plaque in a 3-Arm, 30-Day Study as Compared to String Floss and Manual Brushing.Fresh Health Inc. 口腔健康系统对牙龈炎和菌斑的临床疗效:与牙线和手动刷牙相比,为期 30 天的 3 臂研究。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2023 Feb;44(Suppl 1):2-13.
10
A Randomized, Parallel Design Study to Evaluate the Effects of Different Oral Cleaning Modalities on Gingivitis and Plaque After a 6-Week Period of Home Use.一项为期 6 周家庭使用后评估不同口腔清洁方式对牙龈炎和菌斑影响的随机、平行设计研究。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2024 Mar;45(Suppl 1):6-9.