• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在手动刷牙基础上添加水牙线对牙龈健康的影响。

Evaluation of the Addition of a Water Flosser to Manual Brushing on Gingival Health.

作者信息

Goyal C Ram, Qaqish Jimmy G, Schuller Reinhard, Lyle Deborah M

机构信息

All Sum Research Center, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

Reinhard Schuller Consulting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 2018 Dec;29(4):81-86.

PMID:30942963
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the use of a manual toothbrush plus water flosser to a manual toothbrush alone on clinical signs of inflammation.

METHODS

Seventy-two subjects were randomized into two groups and completed this four-week, single-blind, parallel, clinical trial. Group 1 used a Waterpik®Water Flosser (WF) once daily and brushed with a manual toothbrush twice a day. Group 2 brushed twice a day with a manual toothbrush only (MT). Subjects in group 1 were provided written and verbal instructions for the water flosser and all participants used the toothpaste and manual brush provided, brushing as they normally do. Data were evaluated at baseline (BSL), two weeks (W2), and four weeks (W4) for bleeding on probing (BOP), Modified Gingival Index (MGI), and Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI).

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant reduction from BSL for BOP, MGI, and RMNPI at W2 and W4, except for MT W2 facial proximal MGI (p = 0.153) and marginal RMNPI (p = 0.324). The WF was significantly more effective than the MT for reducing BOP, MGI, and RMNPI at W2 and W4 for all areas measured. The WF was 3.13 times as effective for reducing BOP, 2.69 times for MGI, and 2.44 times for RMNPI at W4 (p < 0.001) for whole mouth scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of the Waterpik®Water Flosser to manual tooth brushing is significantly more effective for improving gingival health than manual tooth brushing alone.

摘要

目的

本临床试验的目的是比较使用手动牙刷加牙线冲洗器与单独使用手动牙刷对炎症临床体征的影响。

方法

72名受试者被随机分为两组,完成了这项为期四周的单盲、平行临床试验。第一组每天使用一次Waterpik®牙线冲洗器(WF),每天用手动牙刷刷牙两次。第二组仅每天用手动牙刷刷牙两次(MT)。第一组的受试者收到了关于牙线冲洗器的书面和口头说明,所有参与者使用提供的牙膏和手动牙刷,按平常方式刷牙。在基线(BSL)、两周(W2)和四周(W4)时评估探诊出血(BOP)、改良牙龈指数(MGI)和海军菌斑指数的Rustogi改良版(RMNPI)数据。

结果

两组在W2和W4时BOP、MGI和RMNPI相对于BSL均有显著降低,但MT组W2时面部近中MGI(p = 0.153)和边缘RMNPI(p = 0.324)除外。在W2和W4时,对于所有测量区域,WF在降低BOP、MGI和RMNPI方面明显比MT更有效。在W4时,对于全口评分,WF降低BOP的效果是MT的3.13倍,降低MGI的效果是MT的2.69倍,降低RMNPI的效果是MT的2.44倍(p < 0.001)。

结论

与单独使用手动牙刷相比,在手动刷牙的基础上添加Waterpik®牙线冲洗器对改善牙龈健康明显更有效。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Addition of a Water Flosser to Manual Brushing on Gingival Health.评估在手动刷牙基础上添加水牙线对牙龈健康的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2018 Dec;29(4):81-86.
2
The addition of a water flosser to power tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and plaque.在电动牙刷的基础上增加水牙线:对出血、牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(2):57-63.
3
Efficacy of Two Interdental Cleaning Devices on Clinical Signs of Inflammation: A Four-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.两种牙间隙清洁装置对炎症临床体征的疗效:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。
J Clin Dent. 2015;26(2):55-60.
4
Comparison of Water Flosser and Interdental Brush on Reduction of Gingival Bleeding and Plaque: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.水牙线与牙间刷在减少牙龈出血和牙菌斑方面的比较:一项随机对照试验性研究
J Clin Dent. 2016 Jun;27(2):61-65.
5
Effectiveness of a sonic-flosser toothbrush with different size brush heads and manual toothbrush plus dental floss on plaque, gingival bleeding and inflammation in adults with naturally occurring gingivitis: A 4-week randomized controlled trial.不同尺寸刷头的声波牙刷与手动牙刷加牙线对患有自然发生牙龈炎的成年人的菌斑、牙龈出血和炎症的效果:一项为期 4 周的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Aug;21(3):624-633. doi: 10.1111/idh.12675. Epub 2023 May 5.
6
Comparison of two power interdental cleaning devices on the reduction of gingivitis.两种电动牙间隙清洁装置对牙龈炎减轻效果的比较。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(1):22-6.
7
Efficacy of the Use of a Water Flosser in Addition to an Electric Toothbrush on Clinical Signs of Inflammation: 4-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.除电动牙刷外使用水牙线对炎症临床体征的疗效:4周随机对照试验
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020 Mar 1;41(3):170-177. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
8
Comparison of Water Flosser and Interdental Brush on Plaque Removal: A Single-Use Pilot Study.水牙线与牙间隙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的比较:一项一次性试点研究。
J Clin Dent. 2016 Mar;27(1):23-26.
9
Efficacy of water flossing on clinical parameters of inflammation and plaque: A four-week randomized controlled trial.水牙线对炎症和菌斑临床参数的疗效:一项为期四周的随机对照试验。
J Dent Hyg. 2023 Oct;97(5):166-186.
10
Efficacy of water flossing on clinical parameters of inflammation and plaque: A 4-week randomized controlled trial.水牙线对炎症和菌斑临床参数的疗效:为期 4 周的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Nov;21(4):659-668. doi: 10.1111/idh.12770. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Alleviation of Plaque and Gingivitis with Dental Water Jet in Regular and Orthodontic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.牙科水激光对普通患者和正畸患者牙菌斑及牙龈炎的缓解作用:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;13(4):396. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040396.
2
Innovations in oral hygiene tools: a mini review on recent developments.口腔卫生工具的创新:近期发展的小型综述
Front Dent Med. 2024 Aug 14;5:1442887. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1442887. eCollection 2024.
3
The effectiveness of water jet flossing and interdental flossing for oral hygiene in orthodontic patients with fixed appliances: a randomized clinical trial.
水冲牙线和牙间牙线对固定矫治器正畸患者口腔卫生的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 27;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04166-0.
4
Effects of hypochlorous acid mouthwash on salivary bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus in patients with periodontal disease: a randomized controlled trial.次氯酸含漱液对牙周病患者唾液细菌(包括金黄色葡萄球菌)的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03358-4.
5
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin With or Without Demineralized Bone Matrix in the Treatment of Grade II Furcation Defects.富自体血小板纤维蛋白联合或不联合脱矿骨基质治疗Ⅱ度根分叉病变的临床及影像学评估
Cureus. 2023 Aug 30;15(8):e44394. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44394. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Effects of water flossing on gingival inflammation and supragingival plaque microbiota: a 12-week randomized controlled trial.水牙线对牙龈炎和龈上菌斑微生物群的影响:一项为期 12 周的随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4567-4577. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05081-4. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
The Efficacy and Safety of Oral Irrigator on the Control of Dental Plaque and Gingivitis: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.口腔冲洗器控制牙菌斑和牙龈炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机、单盲、平行分组临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;20(4):3726. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043726.
8
Efficacy of power-driven interdental cleaning tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动力牙周清洁工具的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Feb;9(1):3-16. doi: 10.1002/cre2.691. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
9
Dental Floss Prescription Pattern among the Dental Interns of Nepal.尼泊尔牙科实习生的牙线处方模式。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020 Aug 31;58(228):580-586. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5133.