Suppr超能文献

早发性厌食症患者短期住院治疗后继续住院治疗与日间治疗的比较(COTIDEA 试验):一项非劣效性随机对照试验的研究方案。

Comparison between continued inpatient treatment versus day patient treatment after short inpatient care in early onset anorexia nervosa (COTIDEA trial): a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Reference Center for Rare Early-Onset Restrictive Eating Disorder, Robert Debré University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.

Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05222-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In children with early-onset anorexia nervosa (first symptoms before 13 years old, EO-AN), experts recommend initial outpatient treatment but in-patient treatment (IP) is frequently indicated due to acute medical instability or for those who have not improved with outpatient treatment. This IP can target either a partial weight restauration or a total weight normalization (return to the previous BMI growth trajectory). There are no evidence in the literature on which is the better therapeutic option in EOAN. But as long length of stay induce social isolation, with elevated costs, we wonder if a stepped-care model of daypatient treatment (DP) after short IP stabilisation may be a treatment option as effective as full-time IP to target weight normalization. We designed a two-arm randomised controlled trial testing the non-inferiority of a stepped-care model of DP after short IP stabilisation versus full-time IP.

METHODS

Eighty-eight children aged 8 to 13 years suffering from EOAN with initial severe undernutrition will be randomly allocated to either IP treatment as usual or a stepped care DP model both targeting weight normalization. Assessments will be conducted at inclusion, somatic stabilization, weight normalization, 6 months and 12 months post randomisation. The primary outcome will be BMI at 12 months post-randomisation. Secondaries outcomes will included clinical (tanner stage), biological (prealbumin, leptin, total ghrelin and IGF1) and radiological (bone mineralization and maturation) outcomes, eating symptomatology and psychiatric assessments, motivation to change, treatment acceptability and quality of life assessments, cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses.

DISCUSSION

COTIDEA will provide rigorous evaluation of treatment alternative to full-time inpatient treatment to allow a reduction of social iatrogenic link to hospital length of stay and associated costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04479683).

摘要

背景

在早发性厌食症患儿(13 岁前出现首发症状,EO-AN)中,专家建议初始门诊治疗,但由于急性医学不稳定或门诊治疗无效的患者,需要进行住院治疗(IP)。这种 IP 可以针对部分体重恢复或完全体重正常化(恢复到之前的 BMI 生长轨迹)。在 EOAN 中,哪种治疗选择更好,目前尚无文献证据。但是,由于住院时间长会导致社会隔离,增加成本,我们想知道,在短期 IP 稳定后采用日间治疗(DP)的分级护理模式是否可以作为一种与全时 IP 一样有效的治疗选择,以实现体重正常化。我们设计了一项双臂随机对照试验,测试短期 IP 稳定后 DP 分级护理模式的非劣效性,与全时 IP 治疗相比。

方法

88 名 8 至 13 岁患有 EOAN 且初始严重营养不良的患儿将被随机分配到 IP 常规治疗或 DP 分级护理模式,两种治疗模式都以体重正常化为目标。评估将在纳入时、躯体稳定时、体重正常化时、随机分组后 6 个月和 12 个月进行。主要结局将是随机分组后 12 个月的 BMI。次要结局包括临床(Tanner 分期)、生物学(前白蛋白、瘦素、总胃饥饿素和 IGF1)和影像学(骨矿化和成熟)结局、饮食症状和精神评估、改变动机、治疗可接受性和生活质量评估、成本效益和成本效果分析。

讨论

COTIDEA 将对全时住院治疗的替代治疗进行严格评估,以减少社会医学因素对住院时间和相关成本的影响。

试验注册

该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(NCT04479683)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/805c/10563254/24e1a1af1534/12888_2023_5222_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验