Mohammad Alkhedhairi, Abraham Shebin, Nada Alarami
Consultant Restorative Dentist, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Qassim Regional Dental Centre, Saudi Arabia.
Specialist Prosthodontic Dentist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Qassim Regional Dental Centre, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Sep;35(6):727-733. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the influence of subgingival horizontal preparation technique (SHPT) and biological oriented preparation technique (BOPT) on periodontal health at a split-mouth model.
The sample of 100 patients was divided into two groups using a spilt-mouth study design; each patient had received two crowns with SHPT and BOPT respectively. The teeth were randomly allocated for the preparation techniques. All prepared teeth were restored with fabricated zirconium cores and ceramic layering. Temporary crowns were delivered after taking an impression and patients were recalled for the final cementation of the crowns. After that, follow-up recalls were set at one month, 3 months, 6 months, one year, and two years to record the following clinical parameters; plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level and patients' satisfaction with treatment.
SHPT had significantly lower plaque and inflammation index at baseline, which increased significantly at 3 months and 2 years' follow-up compared to BOPT. Patients' satisfaction was significantly higher with SHPT at baseline, and it is reduced significantly at 6 months and two years follow- up ( < 0.001). The probing depth was significantly higher in BOPT at baseline and 3 months and decreased significantly at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years' follow-up.
BOPT is a favorable technique with a full crown or veneer, presenting good marginal stability and periodontal behavior.
本研究旨在调查并比较龈下水平预备技术(SHPT)和生物学导向预备技术(BOPT)在分口模型中对牙周健康的影响。
采用分口研究设计将100例患者样本分为两组;每位患者分别接受了采用SHPT和BOPT制备的两颗全冠。牙齿被随机分配接受预备技术。所有预备后的牙齿均用制作的锆核和陶瓷层进行修复。取印模后戴临时冠,之后召回患者进行全冠的最终粘固。此后,在1个月、3个月、6个月、1年和2年进行随访召回,记录以下临床参数:菌斑指数、探诊深度、探诊出血、临床附着水平以及患者对治疗的满意度。
SHPT在基线时的菌斑和炎症指数显著较低,与BOPT相比,在3个月和2年随访时显著增加。SHPT在基线时患者满意度显著较高,在6个月和2年随访时显著降低(P<0.001)。BOPT在基线和3个月时探诊深度显著较高,在6个月、1年和2年随访时显著降低。
BOPT是一种用于全冠或贴面的良好技术,具有良好的边缘稳定性和牙周表现。