• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在心理健康治疗中尊重自闭症患者自主性的伦理要求。

The ethical imperative to honor autistic clients' autonomy in mental health treatment.

作者信息

McVey Alana J, Glaves Katherine Jo, Seaver Samantha, Casagrande Karís A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Autism Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 25;14:1259025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1259025. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1259025
PMID:37817832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10561286/
Abstract

Autistic adolescents and adults commonly experience mental health concerns; however, mental health clinicians may hold implicit stigmatizing views of autism that contribute to case conceptualization and treatment goal setting that align more with caregivers' than clients' goals. This impingement on client autonomy is concerning, problematic, and potentially harmful for autistic clients who are of an age to set their own treatment agenda regardless of co-occurring intellectual disability and/or language delays. An application of the shared decision-making framework, an evidence-based tool for promoting client autonomy, can help to avoid these challenges in treatment. In this perspective, we use a case vignette as an anchor for discussing the imperative of honoring autistic clients' autonomy in mental health treatment and guiding shared decision-making to reduce stigma, promote autonomy, and increase collaborative care for autistic clients in mental health treatment.

摘要

患有自闭症的青少年和成年人通常会有心理健康方面的问题;然而,心理健康临床医生可能对自闭症持有隐性的污名化观点,这导致病例概念化和治疗目标设定更多地与照顾者而非患者自身的目标保持一致。这种对患者自主权的侵犯令人担忧、存在问题,并且对于那些无论是否同时存在智力残疾和/或语言发育迟缓都已到能够设定自己治疗议程年龄的自闭症患者来说,可能是有害的。应用共享决策框架这一促进患者自主权的循证工具,有助于避免治疗中的这些挑战。从这个角度出发,我们以一个病例 vignette 为切入点,讨论在心理健康治疗中尊重自闭症患者自主权的必要性,并指导共享决策,以减少污名化、促进自主权,并加强对心理健康治疗中自闭症患者的协同护理。 (注:原文中“vignette”不太明确具体准确释义,这里暂保留英文)

相似文献

1
The ethical imperative to honor autistic clients' autonomy in mental health treatment.在心理健康治疗中尊重自闭症患者自主性的伦理要求。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 25;14:1259025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1259025. eCollection 2023.
2
Gender diversity in autistic clients: an ethical perspective.自闭症患者中的性别多样性:伦理视角
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 20;14:1244107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1244107. eCollection 2023.
3
Promoting Quality of Life: Suggestions for Mental Health Care Providers Working with Young Autistic Adults.提升生活质量:给从事成年自闭症青年心理健康护理工作者的建议。
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Dec 1;5(4):347-355. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0106. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
What Is Autistic Burnout? A Thematic Analysis of Posts on Two Online Platforms.什么是自闭症倦怠?对两个在线平台上帖子的主题分析。
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Mar 1;4(1):52-65. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0021. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
5
Midwives' views on appropriate antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: do they match clients' preferences?助产士对先天性异常检测适当产前咨询的看法:这些看法与客户的偏好相符吗?
Midwifery. 2014 Jun;30(6):600-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
6
Speech pathologists' experience of involving people with stroke-induced aphasia in clinical decision making during rehabilitation.言语病理学家让中风后失语症患者参与康复临床决策的经验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):870-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1066453. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care.痴呆症和智力残疾患者在寄宿护理机构中使用监测技术的经历。
Nurs Ethics. 2015 May;22(3):307-20. doi: 10.1177/0969733014533237. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
8
"Oh, couldn't be autistic": Examining anti-autistic bias and self-esteem in the therapeutic alliance.“哦,不可能是自闭症患者”:审视治疗联盟中的反自闭症偏见和自尊
Autism. 2023 Oct;27(7):2124-2134. doi: 10.1177/13623613231154622. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
9
The experience of claiming mental health disability benefits: A qualitative analysis of clients' perspectives.声称心理健康残疾福利的经历:客户观点的定性分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Aug;30(4):699-708. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12896. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Show Me the Real You: Enhanced Expression of Rogerian Conditions in Therapeutic Relationship Building with Autistic Adults.展现真实的你:在与成年自闭症患者建立治疗关系中增强罗杰斯条件的表达
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Jun 1;4(2):151-163. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0065. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
2
Neurodivergence-informed therapy.神经多样性启发式治疗。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023 Mar;65(3):310-317. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15384. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
Autistic Adolescents' and Their Parents' Visions for the Future: How Aligned are They?自闭症青少年及其父母对未来的愿景:他们的契合程度如何?
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Mar;4(1):32-41. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0061. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
Discrimination and Medical Mistrust in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of California Adults.加利福尼亚州不同种族和民族的成年人样本中的歧视和医疗不信任。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):4-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.2632.
5
Experiences of Autism Acceptance and Mental Health in Autistic Adults.自闭症成人对自闭症的接受和心理健康的体验。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Feb;48(2):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3342-7.
6
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.在常规精神卫生保健中实施共同决策。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/wps.20412.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
8
Brief Report: Sexual Attraction and Relationships in Adolescents with Autism.简短报告:自闭症青少年的性吸引力与人际关系
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Jun;47(6):1910-1916. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3092-6.
9
Promoting the value and practice of shared decision-making in mental health care.促进精神卫生保健中共同决策的价值与实践。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007 Summer;31(1):54-61. doi: 10.2975/31.1.2007.54.61.
10
Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q).共同决策问卷(SDM-Q)的开发与首次验证
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.012. Epub 2006 Jul 26.