• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hiatal Hernia Repair With Tension-Free Mesh or Crural Sutures Alone in Antireflux Surgery: A 13-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.抗反流手术中单纯使用无张力网片或缝线修补裂孔疝:一项随机临床试验的 13 年随访结果。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jan 1;159(1):11-18. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4976.
2
Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.无张力网片与单纯缝合抗反流手术:一项随机、双盲临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1731-1740. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11917. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh.随机对照临床试验比较腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术采用缝线与缝线加固不可吸收网。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4579-4589. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6211-3. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area.腹腔镜抗反流手术:根据裂孔表面积大小调整裂孔关闭方式。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):542-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9041-7. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
5
Impact of crural relaxing incisions, Collis gastroplasty, and non-cross-linked human dermal mesh crural reinforcement on early hiatal hernia recurrence rates.小腿松弛切口、科利斯胃成形术和非交联人真皮网状小腿增强术对早期食管裂孔疝复发率的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):988-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.937. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Five Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh.腹腔镜修补超大裂孔疝缝线与可吸收与不可吸收网片随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):241-247. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003734.
7
Does crural repair with biosynthetic mesh improve outcomes of revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia?生物合成补片修复股疝是否能改善复发性食管裂孔疝修复手术的结果?
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1687-1695. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03023-x. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
8
Combination of Surgical Technique and Bioresorbable Mesh Reinforcement of the Crural Repair Leads to Low Early Hernia Recurrence Rates with Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中采用手术技术联合可吸收补片加强腹股沟修补可降低早期疝复发率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1477-1481. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04358-y. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术加或不加补片后患者满意度、生活质量和客观复发率相同。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3673-3680. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5405-9. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Prolene Suture Web-Shoelace-Like Pattern: An Alternative to Avoid the Use of Mesh in the Repair of a Large Hiatus Hernia.普理灵缝线网 - 鞋带样模式:一种在大型食管裂孔疝修补中避免使用补片的替代方法。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Dec;25(12):1019-24. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0279. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The management of recurrent hiatal hernia: a single-center retrospective study.复发性食管裂孔疝的管理:一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03129-8.
2
Delayed Strangulated Hiatal Hernia Post-gastrectomy Masquerading as Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Diagnostic Pitfall.胃切除术后伪装成膈疝的延迟绞窄性食管裂孔疝:一个诊断陷阱
Cureus. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):e83274. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83274. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Comparison of short-term clinical efficacy and safety between biological and synthetic meshes in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: a single-center randomized controlled trial.生物补片与合成补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的短期临床疗效及安全性比较:一项单中心随机对照试验
Hernia. 2025 Mar 25;29(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03304-z.
4
Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair.机器人辅助食管裂孔疝和食管旁疝修补术中膈缝线缝合环扎术与生物合成网加强治疗的比较解剖和症状复发结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6476-6484. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11257-0. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
5
Dynamics of hiatal hernia recurrence: how important is a composite crural repair?食管裂孔疝复发的动力学:复合裂孔修补术有多重要?
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1571-1576. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03136-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
6
Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for achalasia combined with hiatal hernia.经口内镜下肌切开术是治疗贲门失弛缓症合并食管裂孔疝的有效方法。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4543-4549. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10948-y. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
7
Medium term (> 12 months) outcomes after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair without conventional fundoplication using PH4B-mesh implant (Phasix™) in 176 reflux patients: experience and technique.176 例反流患者腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术(Phasix™)中使用 PH4B 网片无传统胃底折叠术的中期(>12 个月)结果:经验与技术。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1641-1647. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02999-w. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
8
IDEAL Phase 2a Results: Posterior Rectus Sheath Flap for Hiatal Augmentation in Complex Paraesophageal Hernias.IDEAL 阶段 2a 研究结果:复杂食管裂孔疝中膈后鞘瓣用于膈增强。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 1;279(6):1000-1007. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006247. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

抗反流手术中单纯使用无张力网片或缝线修补裂孔疝:一项随机临床试验的 13 年随访结果。

Hiatal Hernia Repair With Tension-Free Mesh or Crural Sutures Alone in Antireflux Surgery: A 13-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2024 Jan 1;159(1):11-18. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4976.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4976
PMID:37819652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10568445/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Antireflux surgery is an effective treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but the durability of concomitant hiatal hernia repair remains challenging. Previous research reported that the use of a mesh-reinforced, tension-free technique was associated with more dysphagia for solid foods after 3 years without reducing hiatal hernia recurrence rates compared with crural sutures alone, but the long-term effects of this technique have not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of using a mesh for hiatal hernia repair in patients with GERD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed at a single center (Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden) from January 11, 2006, to December 1, 2010. A total of 159 patients were recruited and randomly assigned. Data for the current analysis were collected from September 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. All analyses were conducted with the intention-to-treat population.

INTERVENTIONS

Closure of the diaphragmatic hiatus with crural sutures alone vs a tension-free technique using a nonabsorbable polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (Bard CruraSoft).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was radiologically verified recurrent hiatal hernia after more than 10 years. Secondary outcomes were dysphagia scores (ranging from 1 to 4, with 1 indicating no episodes of dysphagia and 4 indicating more than 3 episodes of dysphagia per day) for solid and liquid foods, generic 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and disease-specific Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale symptom assessment scores, proton pump inhibitor consumption, and reoperation rates. Intergroup comparisons of parametric data were performed using t tests; for nonparametric data, Mann-Whitney U, χ2, or Fisher exact tests were used. For intragroup comparisons vs the baseline at follow-up times, the Friedman test was used, and post hoc analysis was performed using Wilcoxon matched pairs.

RESULTS

Of 145 available patients, follow-up data were obtained from 103 (response rate 71%; mean [SD] age at follow-up, 65 [11.3] years; 55 [53%] female), with 53 initially randomly assigned to mesh reinforcement, and 50 to crural suture alone. The mean (SD) follow-up time was 13 (1.1) years. The verified radiologic hiatal hernia recurrence rates were 11 of 29 (38%) in the mesh group vs 11 of 35 (31%) in the suture group (P = .61). However, 13 years postoperatively, mean (SD) dysphagia scores for solids remained significantly higher in the mesh group (mean [SD], 1.9 [0.7] vs 1.6 [0.9]; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Findings from this long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial suggest that tension-free crural repair with nonabsorbable mesh does not reduce the incidence of hiatal hernia recurrence 13 years postoperatively. This finding combined with maintained higher dysphagia scores does not support the routine use of tension-free polytetrafluoroethylene mesh closure in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair for treatment of GERD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05069493.

摘要

重要性

抗反流手术是治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的有效方法,但同时修复食管裂孔疝的耐久性仍然具有挑战性。先前的研究报告称,与单独使用缝线修复相比,使用网片增强、无张力技术在 3 年后可导致更严重的固体食物吞咽困难,但尚未评估这种技术的长期效果。

目的

评估在 GERD 患者中使用网片修复食管裂孔疝的长期解剖和功能结果。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在瑞典斯德哥尔摩 Ersta 医院进行的单中心、双盲、随机临床试验,从 2006 年 1 月 11 日至 2010 年 12 月 1 日进行。共招募了 159 名患者并进行了随机分组。本分析的数据收集时间为 2021 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日。所有分析均采用意向治疗人群。

干预措施

单独使用缝线关闭膈肌裂孔与使用非吸收性聚四氟乙烯网(Bard CruraSoft)的无张力技术。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结局是超过 10 年后经放射学证实的复发性食管裂孔疝。次要结局是固体和液体食物吞咽困难评分(范围为 1 至 4,1 表示无吞咽困难,4 表示每天有超过 3 次吞咽困难)、通用 36 项简短健康调查问卷和疾病特异性胃肠道症状评定量表症状评估评分、质子泵抑制剂的使用情况和再次手术率。对于参数数据的组间比较,使用 t 检验;对于非参数数据,使用 Mann-Whitney U、χ2 或 Fisher 精确检验。对于与随访时间基线的组内比较,使用 Friedman 检验,然后使用 Wilcoxon 配对检验进行事后分析。

结果

在 145 名可获得随访数据的患者中,有 103 名(应答率 71%;平均[标准差]随访时年龄为 65[11.3]岁;55[53%]为女性)获得了随访数据,其中 53 名最初随机分配到网片增强组,50 名分配到缝线单独组。平均(标准差)随访时间为 13(1.1)年。在网片组中有 11 例(38%)经放射学证实复发性食管裂孔疝,缝线组中有 11 例(31%)(P = .61)。然而,在术后 13 年时,网片组的固体吞咽困难评分仍显著较高(平均[标准差]为 1.9[0.7]比 1.6[0.9];P = .01)。

结论和相关性

这项随机临床试验的长期随访结果表明,在术后 13 年时,无张力缝线修复术并不能降低食管裂孔疝复发的发生率。这一发现加上持续较高的吞咽困难评分不支持在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修复术治疗 GERD 中常规使用无张力聚四氟乙烯网片关闭。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05069493。