Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden.
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jan 1;159(1):11-18. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4976.
Antireflux surgery is an effective treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but the durability of concomitant hiatal hernia repair remains challenging. Previous research reported that the use of a mesh-reinforced, tension-free technique was associated with more dysphagia for solid foods after 3 years without reducing hiatal hernia recurrence rates compared with crural sutures alone, but the long-term effects of this technique have not been assessed.
To assess the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of using a mesh for hiatal hernia repair in patients with GERD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed at a single center (Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden) from January 11, 2006, to December 1, 2010. A total of 159 patients were recruited and randomly assigned. Data for the current analysis were collected from September 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. All analyses were conducted with the intention-to-treat population.
Closure of the diaphragmatic hiatus with crural sutures alone vs a tension-free technique using a nonabsorbable polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (Bard CruraSoft).
The primary outcome was radiologically verified recurrent hiatal hernia after more than 10 years. Secondary outcomes were dysphagia scores (ranging from 1 to 4, with 1 indicating no episodes of dysphagia and 4 indicating more than 3 episodes of dysphagia per day) for solid and liquid foods, generic 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and disease-specific Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale symptom assessment scores, proton pump inhibitor consumption, and reoperation rates. Intergroup comparisons of parametric data were performed using t tests; for nonparametric data, Mann-Whitney U, χ2, or Fisher exact tests were used. For intragroup comparisons vs the baseline at follow-up times, the Friedman test was used, and post hoc analysis was performed using Wilcoxon matched pairs.
Of 145 available patients, follow-up data were obtained from 103 (response rate 71%; mean [SD] age at follow-up, 65 [11.3] years; 55 [53%] female), with 53 initially randomly assigned to mesh reinforcement, and 50 to crural suture alone. The mean (SD) follow-up time was 13 (1.1) years. The verified radiologic hiatal hernia recurrence rates were 11 of 29 (38%) in the mesh group vs 11 of 35 (31%) in the suture group (P = .61). However, 13 years postoperatively, mean (SD) dysphagia scores for solids remained significantly higher in the mesh group (mean [SD], 1.9 [0.7] vs 1.6 [0.9]; P = .01).
Findings from this long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial suggest that tension-free crural repair with nonabsorbable mesh does not reduce the incidence of hiatal hernia recurrence 13 years postoperatively. This finding combined with maintained higher dysphagia scores does not support the routine use of tension-free polytetrafluoroethylene mesh closure in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair for treatment of GERD.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05069493.
抗反流手术是治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的有效方法,但同时修复食管裂孔疝的耐久性仍然具有挑战性。先前的研究报告称,与单独使用缝线修复相比,使用网片增强、无张力技术在 3 年后可导致更严重的固体食物吞咽困难,但尚未评估这种技术的长期效果。
评估在 GERD 患者中使用网片修复食管裂孔疝的长期解剖和功能结果。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在瑞典斯德哥尔摩 Ersta 医院进行的单中心、双盲、随机临床试验,从 2006 年 1 月 11 日至 2010 年 12 月 1 日进行。共招募了 159 名患者并进行了随机分组。本分析的数据收集时间为 2021 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日。所有分析均采用意向治疗人群。
单独使用缝线关闭膈肌裂孔与使用非吸收性聚四氟乙烯网(Bard CruraSoft)的无张力技术。
主要结局是超过 10 年后经放射学证实的复发性食管裂孔疝。次要结局是固体和液体食物吞咽困难评分(范围为 1 至 4,1 表示无吞咽困难,4 表示每天有超过 3 次吞咽困难)、通用 36 项简短健康调查问卷和疾病特异性胃肠道症状评定量表症状评估评分、质子泵抑制剂的使用情况和再次手术率。对于参数数据的组间比较,使用 t 检验;对于非参数数据,使用 Mann-Whitney U、χ2 或 Fisher 精确检验。对于与随访时间基线的组内比较,使用 Friedman 检验,然后使用 Wilcoxon 配对检验进行事后分析。
在 145 名可获得随访数据的患者中,有 103 名(应答率 71%;平均[标准差]随访时年龄为 65[11.3]岁;55[53%]为女性)获得了随访数据,其中 53 名最初随机分配到网片增强组,50 名分配到缝线单独组。平均(标准差)随访时间为 13(1.1)年。在网片组中有 11 例(38%)经放射学证实复发性食管裂孔疝,缝线组中有 11 例(31%)(P = .61)。然而,在术后 13 年时,网片组的固体吞咽困难评分仍显著较高(平均[标准差]为 1.9[0.7]比 1.6[0.9];P = .01)。
这项随机临床试验的长期随访结果表明,在术后 13 年时,无张力缝线修复术并不能降低食管裂孔疝复发的发生率。这一发现加上持续较高的吞咽困难评分不支持在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修复术治疗 GERD 中常规使用无张力聚四氟乙烯网片关闭。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05069493。