Suppr超能文献

恒牙列早期磨牙多个面窝沟龋采用 Hall 技术和光固化复合树脂修复的疗效比较:一项为期 1 年的随机临床试验。

Survival rate of the Hall technique compared with resin composite restoration in multi-surface cavities in primary teeth: a 1-year randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia, São Paulo, Brasil.

Instituto São Leopoldo Mandic e Centro de Pesquisa, Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia, Campinas, Brasil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2023 Oct 9;31:e20230048. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0048. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hall technique (HT) has been indicated for teeth with dentinal caries lesion; however, extensive cavities, with more than two surfaces still seem challenging for restorative treatment in pediatric dentistry, resulting in a higher failure rate and an increased need for retreatment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the survival rate of the Hall technique preformed metal crown (HT) with resin composite restoration (RC) for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary molars.

METHODOLOGY

In this multicenter two-arm randomized clinical trial, children between 4 and 9 years of age with at least one primary molar with cavitated caries lesion involving more than two surfaces, including one buccal or palatal/lingual surface, were selected from 17 Brazilian cities. A total of 364 teeth were allocated into two groups: (1) teeth treated with selective caries removal and RC and (2) treated with the HT. The survival rate was assessed at 6 and 12 months after the interventions. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan‒Meier method. Cox regression was used to determine the influence of explanatory variables on the survival rate (α=5%).

RESULTS

After 12 months, 292 teeth were re-evaluated. A total of 358 teeth were re-evaluated at least once during the study and included in the survival analysis. The HT (87.8%) resulted in a higher survival rate than RC restoration (75.7%) (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

HT has a higher survival rate than RC as a treatment for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02782390.

摘要

背景

Hall 技术(HT)已被应用于有牙本质龋损的牙齿;然而,对于儿童牙科的广泛龋损,涉及超过两个表面的龋损,修复治疗仍然具有挑战性,导致更高的失败率和更高的再治疗需求。

目的

比较 Hall 技术预成金属冠(HT)与树脂复合材料修复(RC)治疗儿童第一恒磨牙多表面龋损的存活率。

方法

在这项多中心、双臂随机临床试验中,从 17 个巴西城市中选择了年龄在 4 至 9 岁之间、至少有一颗第一恒磨牙有龋损,涉及超过两个表面,包括一个颊面或腭/舌面的儿童。共有 364 颗牙齿被分为两组:(1)用选择性龋坏去除和 RC 治疗的牙齿,和(2)用 HT 治疗的牙齿。在干预后 6 个月和 12 个月评估存活率。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法进行生存分析。Cox 回归用于确定解释变量对生存率的影响(α=5%)。

结果

在 12 个月时,重新评估了 292 颗牙齿。在研究期间至少进行了一次重新评估的共有 358 颗牙齿,包括在生存分析中。HT(87.8%)的存活率高于 RC 修复(75.7%)(p=0.004)。

结论

HT 作为治疗儿童多表面龋损的方法,其存活率高于 RC。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02782390。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8429/10561961/2e0e6e822a58/1678-7757-jaos-31-e20230048-gf01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验