Universidade Ibirapuera - UNIB, Graduate Program in Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Nov 13;35:e004. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0004. eCollection 2020.
There is a lack of evidence about the best approach for cavitated caries lesions with the possibility of pulpal involvement in primary teeth. Thus, the present authors aimed to verify the best treatment for deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth. The search was conducted in MEDLINE/Pubmed and Web of Science databases until May 2020. Studies that compared techniques to manage deep caries lesions with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB tool. Network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted considering the treatment clinical success as an outcome, according to the pulp health condition. From 491 potentially eligible studies, 9 were included. For deep caries lesions with pulp vitality, the Hall Technique presented the highest probability of success (78%). In the event of accidental pulp exposure, pulpectomy presented a 76% chance of providing the best clinical results. For pulp necrosis, no difference was observed between a pulpectomy and non-instrumented endodontic treatment (RR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.21-2.33) Thus, it was concluded that the Hall Technique may be a better option for deep caries lesions with pulp vitality. In cases of accidental pulp exposure of vital teeth during caries removal, a pulpectomy may be considered the best option. However, there are insufficient studies to build up evidence about the best treatment option when irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis is present.
关于伴有牙髓病变可能的龋损,目前缺乏最佳治疗方法的证据。因此,本研究旨在比较不同治疗方法对伴有或不伴有牙髓病变的深龋的疗效。检索 MEDLINE/Pubmed 和 Web of Science 数据库,截止日期为 2020 年 5 月。纳入比较不同方法治疗深龋并至少随访 12 个月的研究。采用 RoB 工具评估偏倚风险。根据牙髓健康状况,将治疗临床成功率作为结局指标,进行网络荟萃分析和两两荟萃分析。从 491 篇潜在合格研究中,共纳入 9 篇研究。对于伴有牙髓活力的深龋,Hall 技术的成功率最高(78%)。如果意外暴露牙髓,牙髓切除术的成功率为 76%。对于牙髓坏死,牙髓切除术与非器械根管治疗无差异(RR=0.69;95%CI:0.21-2.33)。因此,结论认为 Hall 技术可能是伴有牙髓活力的深龋的更好选择。对于龋坏去除过程中意外暴露的活髓,牙髓切除术可能是最佳选择。然而,目前尚缺乏关于不可逆性牙髓炎或牙髓坏死时最佳治疗方法的证据。