• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用有针对性的教育资源来改进机器人减重手术培训。

Use of targeted educational resources to improve robotic bariatric surgery training.

机构信息

Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Mailstop 8109-22-9905, St. Louis, MO, 63110-1093, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):894-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10436-9. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10436-9
PMID:37823946
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence for how to best train surgical residents for robotic bariatric procedures is lacking. We developed targeted educational resources to promote progression on the robotic bariatric learning curve. This study aimed to characterize the effect of resources on resident participation in robotic bariatric procedures.

METHODS

Performance metrics from the da Vinci Surgical System were retrospectively reviewed for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) cases involving general surgery trainees with a single robotic bariatric surgeon. Pictorial case guides and narrated operative videos were developed for these procedures and disseminated to trainees. Percent active control time (%ACT)-amount of trainee console time spent in active instrument manipulations over total active time from both consoles-was the primary outcome measure following dissemination. One-way ANOVA, Student's t-tests, and Pearson correlations were applied.

RESULTS

From September 2020 to July 2021, 50 cases (54% SG, 46% RYGB) involving 14 unique trainees (PGY1-PGY5) were included. From November 2021 to May 2022 following dissemination, 29 cases (34% SG, 66% RYGB) involving 8 unique trainees were included. Mean %ACT significantly increased across most trainee groups following resource distribution: 21% versus 38% for PGY3s (p = 0.087), 32% versus 45% for PGY4s (p = 0.0009), and 38% versus 57% for PGY5s (p = 0.0015) and remained significant when stratified by case type. Progressive trainee %ACT was not associated with total active time for SG cases before or after intervention (pre r = - 0.0019, p = 0.9; post r = - 0.039, p = 0.9). It was moderately positively associated with total active time for RYGB cases before dissemination (r = 0.46, p = 0.027) but lost this association following intervention (r = 0.16, p = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Use of targeted educational resources promoted increases in trainee participation in robotic bariatric procedures with more time spent actively operating at the console. As educators continue to develop robotic training curricula, efforts should include high-quality resource development for other sub-specialty procedures. Future work will examine the impact of increased trainee participation on clinical and patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

缺乏关于如何最好地培训外科住院医师进行机器人减重手术的证据。我们开发了有针对性的教育资源,以促进机器人减重学习曲线的进展。本研究旨在描述资源对住院医师参与机器人减重手术的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了涉及普外科住院医师和单一机器人减重外科医生的袖状胃切除术(SG)和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)病例的达芬奇手术系统的性能指标。为这些手术制作了图片案例指南和旁白手术视频,并分发给住院医师。传播后,主要观察指标是控制台主动控制时间百分比(%ACT)-受训者控制台主动仪器操作时间占两个控制台总主动时间的百分比。应用单因素方差分析、学生 t 检验和 Pearson 相关性分析。

结果

从 2020 年 9 月到 2021 年 7 月,共有 50 例(54%SG,46%RYGB)涉及 14 名独特的受训者(PGY1-PGY5)。在传播后的 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 5 月期间,共有 8 名独特的受训者参与了 29 例(34%SG,66%RYGB)。在资源分配后,大多数受训者组的平均%ACT 显著增加:PGY3 组从 21%增加到 38%(p=0.087),PGY4 组从 32%增加到 45%(p=0.0009),PGY5 组从 38%增加到 57%(p=0.0015),并且在按病例类型分层时仍然具有统计学意义。在干预前后,SG 病例的渐进式受训者%ACT 与总主动时间无关(干预前 r=-0.0019,p=0.9;干预后 r=-0.039,p=0.9)。在传播前,它与 RYGB 病例的总主动时间呈中度正相关(r=0.46,p=0.027),但在干预后失去了这种相关性(r=0.16,p=0.5)。

结论

使用有针对性的教育资源促进了住院医师参与机器人减重手术的增加,同时在控制台的主动操作时间也有所增加。随着教育工作者继续开发机器人培训课程,应努力为其他亚专业手术开发高质量的资源。未来的工作将研究增加住院医师参与对临床和患者结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Use of targeted educational resources to improve robotic bariatric surgery training.利用有针对性的教育资源来改进机器人减重手术培训。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):894-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10436-9. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
2
Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety.外科受训者对减重手术安全性的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):3014-3025. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6587-0. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:使用 2015-2016 MBSAQIP 数据库进行倾向评分匹配的比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1600-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术治疗少数民族患者的结局:代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划数据库的回顾性研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Mar;17(3):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Active control time: an objective performance metric for trainee participation in robotic surgery.主动控制时间:机器人手术中衡量学员参与度的客观绩效指标。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2117-2123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01628-5. Epub 2023 May 26.
6
Robotic sleeve gastrectomy has higher complication rates compared to laparoscopic: 8-year analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic primary bariatric surgery.与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人袖状胃切除术并发症发生率更高:机器人与腹腔镜初次减肥手术的8年分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Apr;21(4):372-381. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.11.014. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
7
Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.基于代谢与减重外科认证和质量改进计划数据库的袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术 30 天结果:首次报告。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
8
Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助减重手术翻修术的疗效:一项对MBSAQIP数据库的回顾性病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1573-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06917-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.机器人减重手术在老年人中的应用:与腹腔镜方法相比更安全吗?对代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库的 7 年分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Sep;33(9):2671-2678. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06720-1. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
10
Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries Still Have Clinically Comparable Outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜减重手术仍具有临床可比性结果。
Obes Surg. 2024 Aug;34(8):2954-2964. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07368-1. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective performance indicators during robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass distinguish experienced from trainee surgeons: a cross-sectional study.机器人辅助Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术中的客观性能指标区分经验丰富的外科医生与实习外科医生:一项横断面研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11873-4.
2
Robotic performance metrics model fellow proficiency in living donor nephrectomy.机器人手术表现指标模型可衡量活体供肾切除术医生的熟练度。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 27;18(1):271. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02032-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Active control time: an objective performance metric for trainee participation in robotic surgery.主动控制时间:机器人手术中衡量学员参与度的客观绩效指标。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2117-2123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01628-5. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
A systematic review of robotic surgery curricula using a contemporary educational framework.使用当代教育框架对机器人手术课程进行的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2833-2841. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09788-5. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
3
Attending guidance advised: educational quality of surgical videos on YouTube.
术者指导建议:YouTube 外科手术视频的教育质量。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4189-4198. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08751-0. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人减重手术治疗肥胖症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2440-2456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis.利用 MBSAQIP 数据库分析 4 年来机器人辅助减重手术的利用趋势和围手术期结果。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):854-861. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05055-5. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
6
Correlation between operative time and crowd-sourced skills assessment for robotic bariatric surgery.机器人减重手术的手术时间与众包技能评估的相关性。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5303-5309. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08019-z. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.2015 年至 2018 年原发性机器人减重手术利用和围手术期结果的趋势:来自 MBSAQIP 数据登记处的 46764 例患者的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3915-3922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07839-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool.腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)视频评估工具:推荐的手术视频质量评估检查表的制定和验证。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1362-1369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
From Da Vinci Si to Da Vinci Xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot.从达芬奇Si到达芬奇Xi:机器人铺单与对接的实际操作时代
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):835-839. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01057-8. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
Operative performance outcomes of a simulator-based robotic surgical skills curriculum.基于模拟器的机器人外科技能课程的手术操作成果
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4543-4548. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07243-6. Epub 2019 Nov 15.