Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0292098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292098. eCollection 2023.
The ideological dispute between left and right has dominated the political discussion for decades in multiple countries across the globe. However, in recent years people vs. elite debates have replaced traditional ideological conflicts in explaining voters' electoral decisions. In this paper, we investigate whether anti-elite attitudes contribute to a key political outcome: the increase in successful independent candidates. We implement a conjoint experiment in Chile, where anti-elite sentiments and the number of successful independent politicians are currently prominent. We find that preferences for independent candidates largely increase among voters with anti-elite orientations. In a context where traditional parties face difficult times, such beliefs are key to understanding the factors behind support for candidates with no party affiliation. This insight is important because electing independent politicians can promote a personalistic style of politics, undermine democratic accountability, and foster conflict between the executive and legislative branches.
左右翼意识形态之争在全球多个国家主导了数十年的政治讨论。然而,近年来,民众与精英的辩论已经取代了传统的意识形态冲突,成为解释选民选举决定的主要因素。在本文中,我们探讨了反精英态度是否有助于一个关键的政治结果:成功的独立候选人的增加。我们在智利实施了一项联合实验,在智利,反精英情绪和成功的独立政治家的数量目前非常突出。我们发现,在具有反精英倾向的选民中,对独立候选人的偏好大大增加。在传统政党面临困难时期的背景下,这些信念是理解支持无党派候选人的背后因素的关键。这一洞察非常重要,因为选举独立政治家可能会助长个人主义政治风格,破坏民主问责制,并加剧行政和立法部门之间的冲突。