Sigounas Vaia Y
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Med Anthropol Q. 2024 Mar;38(1):40-53. doi: 10.1111/maq.12818. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
Assistive devices serve as vectors for the ideals, judgments, and goals that their society of origin has towards people with disabilities. For some Ugandan inventors and prosthetists, familiarity with sociocultural norms and consistent feedback allow them to design prosthetic limbs as technologies of care that specifically meet the needs of Ugandans using these devices. In contrast, many biomedical engineers living in the United States rely on what I call the "engineering imaginary" to produce universalized forms of assistive technology intended for people living in an essentialized Global South. Drawing on research with engineers, prosthetists, and people living with limb loss in Uganda and the United States, I investigate the social and cultural aspects of prosthetic limb design and argue that there is a cross-cultural mismatch about what a prosthetic device does and what kinds of limbs it should fit. This mismatch becomes inscribed in the prosthetic device itself.
辅助设备承载着其原产社会对残疾人的理想、评判和目标。对于一些乌干达发明家及假肢矫形师而言,熟悉社会文化规范并持续获得反馈,使他们能够将假肢设计成专门满足使用这些设备的乌干达人需求的护理技术。相比之下,许多生活在美国的生物医学工程师依赖于我所称的“工程想象”,来生产面向本质化的全球南方地区居民的通用形式的辅助技术。通过对乌干达和美国的工程师、假肢矫形师以及肢体缺失者的研究,我调查了假肢设计的社会和文化层面,并认为在假肢的功能以及应适配何种肢体类型方面存在跨文化的不匹配。这种不匹配被铭刻在假肢设备本身之中。