• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用桡动脉移植物进行冠状动脉旁路移植术后主要不良心血管事件的危险因素。

Risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting using radial artery grafts.

作者信息

Xia Tianyu, Li Bo, Zhang Wei, Wang Zhe, Ye Xiaofeng, Zhou Mi, Li Haiqing, Qiu Jiapei, Zhu Yunpeng, Zhao Qiang

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Cardiology, Naval Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 27;10:1238161. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1238161. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1238161
PMID:37829689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting using radial artery grafts (RA-CABG) has improved long-term outcomes. However, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-4, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization) after RA-CABG still occur and the predictors remain uncertain. This study aimed to detect independent risk factors of MACE-4 after RA-CABG.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study (NCT04935086) conducted among patients who underwent primary isolated RA-CABG between 2009 and 2019 in our center. Baseline characteristics, procedure characteristics, and medication use were compared to identify the independent predictors of MACE-4, all-cause death, and myocardial infarction (MI) with univariate and then multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 370 patients were analyzed using a mean follow-up duration of 48.8 ± 41.0 months. MACE-4, all-cause death, and MI occurred in 102 (27.6%), 27 (7.3%), and 66 patients (17.8%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed prior MI (OR = 2.12, 95%CI 1.05-4.25,  = 0.04) and RA to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (non-left internal mammary artery to LAD) (OR = 4.87, 95%CI 1.41-16.82,  = 0.01) as independent predictors of MACE-4 after surgery. Female (OR = 4.53, 95%CI 1.06-19.41,  = 0.04), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% (OR = 21.00, 95%CI 1.20-368.35,  = 0.04), and RA to LAD (OR = 8.55, 95%CI 1.35-54.10,  = 0.02) were independent predictors of all-cause death. Prior MI (OR = 3.11, 95%CI 1.40-6.94,  = 0.006) emerged as an independent predictor of MI.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested that prior MI and RA to LAD were independent predictors of MACE-4 after RA-CABG. Being female, having an LVEF < 40% and RA to LAD indicated death. Prior MI indicated new MI.

摘要

背景

使用桡动脉移植物进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(RA-CABG)改善了长期预后。然而,RA-CABG术后主要不良心血管事件(MACE-4,包括全因死亡、心肌梗死、中风和再次血运重建)仍会发生,且预测因素尚不确定。本研究旨在检测RA-CABG术后MACE-4的独立危险因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性病例对照研究(NCT04935086),研究对象为2009年至2019年在本中心接受初次单纯RA-CABG的患者。比较基线特征、手术特征和药物使用情况,通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归确定MACE-4、全因死亡和心肌梗死(MI)的独立预测因素。

结果

共分析了370例患者,平均随访时间为48.8±41.0个月。MACE-4、全因死亡和MI分别发生在102例(27.6%)、27例(7.3%)和66例患者(17.8%)中。多因素分析显示,既往MI(OR = 2.12,95%CI 1.05 - 4.25,P = 0.04)和桡动脉至左前降支动脉(LAD)(非左内乳动脉至LAD)(OR = 4.87,95%CI 1.41 - 16.82,P = 0.01)是术后MACE-4的独立预测因素。女性(OR = 4.53,95%CI 1.0

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ab/10565515/6f0ed69d3f4e/fcvm-10-1238161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ab/10565515/ba69cb438067/fcvm-10-1238161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ab/10565515/6f0ed69d3f4e/fcvm-10-1238161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ab/10565515/ba69cb438067/fcvm-10-1238161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ab/10565515/6f0ed69d3f4e/fcvm-10-1238161-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting using radial artery grafts.使用桡动脉移植物进行冠状动脉旁路移植术后主要不良心血管事件的危险因素。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 27;10:1238161. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1238161. eCollection 2023.
2
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
3
[Comparison of myotomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in surgical treatment of symptomatic left anterior descending myocardial bridges].[症状性左前降支心肌桥手术治疗中肌切开术与冠状动脉搭桥术的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 3;100(40):3141-3146. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200321-00875.
4
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
5
Clinical results of endarterectomy of the right and left anterior descending coronary arteries.左右冠状动脉前降支动脉内膜切除术的临床结果。
J Card Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):16-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1999.tb00945.x.
6
Cardiovascular Risk Profile, Presentation and Management Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后急性冠状动脉综合征患者的心血管风险特征、临床表现和治疗结局。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101078. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101078. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
7
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Non-Protected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 1-Year Outcomes in a High Volume Single Center Study.非保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项高容量单中心研究的1年结果
Life (Basel). 2022 Feb 27;12(3):347. doi: 10.3390/life12030347.
8
Immediate results and six-month clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery.曾接受冠状动脉搭桥手术患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的即时结果及六个月临床结局
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2011 Winter;6(1):31-6. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
9
Multiple arterial conduits for multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with mild to moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a multicenter retrospective study.轻度至中度左心室收缩功能不全患者多支冠状动脉搭桥术中使用多条动脉移植物:一项多中心回顾性研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 3;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01463-5.
10
Effects of the side of arteriovenous fistula on outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery in hemodialysis-dependent patients.动静脉瘘侧对血液透析依赖患者冠状动脉旁路手术后结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.031. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Cardiac Surgery Using Combined Clinical, Laboratory, and Echocardiographic Parameters: A Machine Learning Approach.使用临床、实验室和超声心动图参数组合预测心脏手术后的主要不良心血管事件:一种机器学习方法。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 23;61(8):1323. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081323.
2
Two Decades of CABG in the UK: A Propensity Matched Analysis of Outcomes by Conduit Choice.英国冠状动脉旁路移植术二十年:基于导管选择的倾向匹配结果分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 12;13(16):4717. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164717.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term observational angiographic patency and perfect patency of radial artery compared with saphenous vein or internal mammary artery in coronary bypass surgery.与冠状动脉旁路移植术中的隐静脉或内乳动脉相比,桡动脉的长期观察性血管造影通畅率和完美通畅率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;167(4):1293-1302.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.08.047. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
2
Radial artery versus saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.桡动脉与隐静脉和右内乳动脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;62(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac345.
3
Prognostic factors of 10-year mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a secondary analysis of the arterial revascularization trial.
冠状动脉旁路移植术后 10 年死亡率的预后因素:动脉血管重建试验的二次分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 27;61(6):1414-1420. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac043.
4
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e4-e17. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery with multiple versus single arterial grafts.冠状动脉旁路移植术中单支与多支动脉移植物的长期生存比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Mar 24;61(4):925-933. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab392.
6
Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Skeletonized vs Pedicled Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting Techniques in the Arterial Revascularization Trial.动脉血管重建试验中骨骼化与蒂状内乳动脉采集技术的长期临床结果比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;6(12):1380-1386. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3866.
7
Radial artery or saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting.桡动脉或隐静脉用于冠状动脉旁路移植术。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov;32(8):479-484. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
Multiarterial coronary grafting using the radial artery as a second arterial graft: how far does the survival benefit extend?多支冠状动脉旁路移植术使用桡动脉作为第二条动脉移植物:生存获益能延伸多远?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 27;61(1):216-224. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab308.
9
Skeletonized vs Pedicled Internal Mammary Artery Graft Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis From the COMPASS Trial.骨架化与蒂状内乳动脉取骨在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用:来自 COMPASS 试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;6(9):1042-1049. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1686.
10
Ten-year all-cause mortality according to smoking status in patients with severe coronary artery disease undergoing surgical or percutaneous revascularization.严重冠状动脉疾病患者经手术或经皮血运重建后,根据吸烟状况的 10 年全因死亡率。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Mar 11;29(2):312-320. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa089.