• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示影响招募的关键临床试验特征。

Uncovering key clinical trial features influencing recruitment.

作者信息

Idnay Betina, Fang Yilu, Butler Alex, Moran Joyce, Li Ziran, Lee Junghwan, Ta Casey, Liu Cong, Yuan Chi, Chen Huanyao, Stanley Edward, Hripcsak George, Larson Elaine, Marder Karen, Chung Wendy, Ruotolo Brenda, Weng Chunhua

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY Research, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Sep 4;7(1):e199. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.623. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2023.623
PMID:37830010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are the foundation for medical advances, but participant recruitment remains a persistent barrier to their success. This retrospective data analysis aims to (1) identify clinical trial features associated with successful participant recruitment measured by accrual percentage and (2) compare the characteristics of the RCTs by assessing the most and least successful recruitment, which are indicated by varying thresholds of accrual percentage such as ≥ 90% vs ≤ 10%, ≥ 80% vs ≤ 20%, and ≥ 70% vs ≤ 30%.

METHODS

Data from the internal research registry at Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Aggregated Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov were collected for 393 randomized interventional treatment studies closed to further enrollment. We compared two regularized linear regression and six tree-based machine learning models for accrual percentage (i.e., reported accrual to date divided by the target accrual) prediction. The outperforming model and Tree SHapley Additive exPlanations were used for feature importance analysis for participant recruitment. The identified features were compared between the two subgroups.

RESULTS

CatBoost regressor outperformed the others. Key features positively associated with recruitment success, as measured by accrual percentage, include government funding and compensation. Meanwhile, cancer research and non-conventional recruitment methods (e.g., websites) are negatively associated with recruitment success. Statistically significant subgroup differences (corrected -value < .05) were found in 15 of the top 30 most important features.

CONCLUSION

This multi-source retrospective study highlighted key features influencing RCT participant recruitment, offering actionable steps for improvement, including flexible recruitment infrastructure and appropriate participant compensation.

摘要

背景

随机临床试验(RCT)是医学进步的基础,但受试者招募仍然是其成功开展的一个长期障碍。这项回顾性数据分析旨在:(1)确定与以入组百分比衡量的成功受试者招募相关的临床试验特征;(2)通过评估入组百分比的不同阈值(如≥90%对≤10%、≥80%对≤20%、≥70%对≤30%)所表明的最成功和最不成功招募情况,比较随机对照试验的特征。

方法

收集了哥伦比亚大学欧文医学中心内部研究登记处以及ClinicalTrials.gov汇总分析中393项已结束进一步入组的随机介入治疗研究的数据。我们比较了两种正则化线性回归模型和六种基于树的机器学习模型对入组百分比(即截至目前报告的入组人数除以目标入组人数)的预测情况。使用表现最佳的模型和树状Shapley加法解释进行受试者招募的特征重要性分析。在两个亚组之间比较所确定的特征。

结果

CatBoost回归模型的表现优于其他模型。以入组百分比衡量,与招募成功呈正相关的关键特征包括政府资助和补偿。同时,癌症研究和非常规招募方法(如网站)与招募成功呈负相关。在30个最重要特征中的15个特征上发现了具有统计学意义的亚组差异(校正P值<0.05)。

结论

这项多源回顾性研究突出了影响随机对照试验受试者招募的关键特征,提供了可采取的改进措施,包括灵活的招募基础设施和适当的受试者补偿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c139/10565197/415466522b06/S2059866123006234_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c139/10565197/1aed5bef6037/S2059866123006234_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c139/10565197/a49f24c6dd57/S2059866123006234_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c139/10565197/415466522b06/S2059866123006234_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c139/10565197/1aed5bef6037/S2059866123006234_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c139/10565197/a49f24c6dd57/S2059866123006234_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c139/10565197/415466522b06/S2059866123006234_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Uncovering key clinical trial features influencing recruitment.揭示影响招募的关键临床试验特征。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Sep 4;7(1):e199. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.623. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Accrual Quality Improvement Program for clinical trials.临床试验累积质量改进计划。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):744-753. doi: 10.1177/17407745241243027. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Direct-to-Consumer Recruitment Methods via Traditional and Social Media to Aid in Research Accrual for Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases: Comparative Analysis Study.直接面向消费者的招募方法,通过传统和社交媒体,以帮助罕见病临床试验的研究积累:比较分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e39262. doi: 10.2196/39262.
5
Performance and predictors of recruitment success in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's cardiovascular clinical trials.国家心肺血液研究所心血管临床试验中招募成功的表现和预测因素。
Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):444-451. doi: 10.1177/1740774518792271. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
Optimizing accrual to a large-scale, clinically integrated randomized trial in anesthesiology: A 2-year analysis of recruitment.优化麻醉学领域一项大规模临床综合随机试验的入组情况:为期2年的招募分析
Clin Trials. 2025 Feb;22(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/17407745241255087. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Prediction of RECRUITment In randomized clinical Trials (RECRUIT-IT)-rationale and design for an international collaborative study.预测随机临床试验中的 RECRUITment(RECRUIT-IT)-一项国际合作研究的原理和设计。
Trials. 2020 Aug 21;21(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04666-8.
8
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Two Centers in China: Retrospective Study.中国两个中心用于预测非心脏手术后心肌损伤的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 26;7:e54872. doi: 10.2196/54872.
9
Publication Bias in Gastrointestinal Oncology Trials Performed over the Past Decade.过去十年胃肠道肿瘤试验中的发表偏倚。
Oncologist. 2021 Aug;26(8):660-667. doi: 10.1002/onco.13759. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
10
Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis with short diameter less than 8 mm in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on radiomics.基于放射组学的甲状腺乳头状癌短径小于 8mm 预测侧颈部淋巴结转移
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00803-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized study comparing patient portal and email communications for trial recruitment.一项比较患者门户网站和电子邮件沟通用于试验招募的随机研究。
Clin Trials. 2025 Aug 21:17407745251358259. doi: 10.1177/17407745251358259.
2
CLEAR: A vision to support clinical evidence lifecycle with continuous learning.清晰:通过持续学习支持临床证据生命周期的愿景。
J Biomed Inform. 2025 Jul 29;169:104884. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104884.
3
A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.人工智能在临床试验风险评估中的应用范围综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Misalignment between COVID-19 hotspots and clinical trial sites.新冠病毒热点地区与临床试验点之间的错位。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Oct 12;28(11):2461-2466. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab167.
2
Barriers and potential solutions in the recruitment and retention of older patients in clinical trials-lessons learned from six large multicentre randomized controlled trials.在临床试验中招募和留住老年患者的障碍及潜在解决方案:从六个大型多中心随机对照试验中吸取的经验教训。
Age Ageing. 2021 Nov 10;50(6):1988-1996. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab147.
3
Challenges, facilitators and barriers to screening study participants in early disease stages-experience from the MACUSTAR study.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 30;8(1):486. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01886-7.
4
Clinical researchers' insights on key data for eligibility screening in clinical studies.临床研究人员对临床研究中资格筛选关键数据的见解。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 16;8(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.617. eCollection 2024.
5
Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Historically Marginalized Populations in Colorectal Cancer Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Using Systematic Review Methods.招募和保留结直肠癌试验中历史上被边缘化人群的策略:使用系统评价方法的横断面分析。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Nov 26;56(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01146-z.
6
Scientia pro bono humani generis: Science for the benefit of humanity.为人类福祉的科学:造福人类的科学。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 20;8(1):e29. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.696. eCollection 2024.
早期疾病阶段筛查研究参与者的挑战、促进因素和障碍——MACUSTAR 研究的经验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01243-8.
4
Transparency, trust and minimizing burden to increase recruitment and retention in trials: a systematic review.提高试验招募和保留率的透明度、信任和最小负担:系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:35-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Social media recruitment for mental health research: A systematic review.社交媒体在心理健康研究中的招募作用:系统综述。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;103:152197. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152197. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.利用可解释人工智能实现从局部解释到树木的全局理解
Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
7
Barriers and facilitators to recruitment and enrollment of HIV-infected individuals with opioid use disorder in a clinical trial.在临床试验中招募和纳入感染 HIV 且有阿片类药物使用障碍的个体的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):862. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4721-x.
8
Developing a model to predict accrual to cancer clinical trials: Data from an NCI designated cancer center.开发一个预测癌症临床试验入组情况的模型:来自美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心的数据。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 19;15:100421. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100421. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: protocol for a systematic review.与一般实践中随机对照试验招募相关的因素:系统评价方案。
Trials. 2019 May 10;20(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3354-z.
10
Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.与失败的临床试验相关的因素及提高成功可能性的机会:一项综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 7;11:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.