• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩展计划行为理论解释低速驾驶行为的影响机制。

Extended theory of planned behavior to explain the influence mechanism of low-speed driving behavior.

机构信息

School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 13;18(10):e0287489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287489. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0287489
PMID:37831699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10575494/
Abstract

Low-speed driving is an underestimated dangerous behavior that may cause safety issues, such as speed dispersion and traffic flow bottlenecks. To investigate the influence mechanism of low-speed driving behavior, this study constructed the low-speed specific model (LSSM) by extending theory of planned behavior (TPB). The LSSM incorporated two factors, namely, risk perception and behavior habit, into the standard TPB components (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavior intention). Web-based questionnaires were used to collect data from a valid sample of 374, of which males accounted for 50%. The participants were aged from 18 to 65 years (M = 35.40, SD = 0.88). The structural equation model was applied to calculate and validate the interrelationships among the components of LSSM. Results showed that the LSSM could explain the variance in low-speed driving behavior and behavior intention by 46% and 76%, respectively. Meanwhile, attitude (β = 0.52, p < 0.001) and behavior habit (β = 0.48, p < 0.001) had the strongest positive influence and prediction power over low-speed driving behavior, respectively, whereas subjective norm (β = 0.05, p > 0.01) and perceived behavioral control (β = -0.12, p > 0.01) showed few significant in influencing the intention. LSSM also showed that people who were sensitive to driving risk perception would avoid low-speed driving behaviors and attitudes. Our findings may provide theoretical support for interventions on low-speed driving behavior.

摘要

低速驾驶是一种被低估的危险行为,可能会导致安全问题,如速度分散和交通流瓶颈。为了研究低速驾驶行为的影响机制,本研究通过扩展计划行为理论(TPB)构建了低速特定模型(LSSM)。LSSM 将风险感知和行为习惯这两个因素纳入到标准 TPB 成分(态度、主观规范、感知行为控制和行为意向)中。本研究采用基于网络的问卷从有效样本中收集了 374 名参与者的数据,其中男性占 50%。参与者年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间(M = 35.40,SD = 0.88)。结构方程模型用于计算和验证 LSSM 各成分之间的相互关系。结果表明,LSSM 可以分别解释 46%和 76%的低速驾驶行为和行为意向的方差。同时,态度(β=0.52,p<0.001)和行为习惯(β=0.48,p<0.001)对低速驾驶行为具有最强的正向影响和预测能力,而主观规范(β=0.05,p>0.01)和感知行为控制(β=-0.12,p>0.01)对行为意向的影响较小。LSSM 还表明,对驾驶风险感知敏感的人会避免低速驾驶行为和态度。本研究结果可能为干预低速驾驶行为提供理论支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c16/10575494/688c1cbff93d/pone.0287489.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c16/10575494/e290769e1494/pone.0287489.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c16/10575494/688c1cbff93d/pone.0287489.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c16/10575494/e290769e1494/pone.0287489.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c16/10575494/688c1cbff93d/pone.0287489.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Extended theory of planned behavior to explain the influence mechanism of low-speed driving behavior.扩展计划行为理论解释低速驾驶行为的影响机制。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 13;18(10):e0287489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287489. eCollection 2023.
2
Perceived enjoyment, concentration, intention, and speed violation behavior: Using flow theory and theory of planned behavior.感知到的享受、专注、意图和速度违规行为:运用心流理论和计划行为理论
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):694-702. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1307969. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
Underestimated Risk Perception Characteristics of Drivers Based on Extended Theory of Planned Behavior.基于扩展计划行为理论的驾驶员低估风险感知特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 26;19(5):2744. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052744.
4
Understanding the intention and behavior of psychological help-seeking among Chinese college students using theory of planned behavior: a three-month follow-up study.使用计划行为理论理解中国大学生的心理求助意向和行为:一项为期三个月的随访研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2024 Apr;29(4):765-777. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2217379. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
Factors influencing drink driving intention among motorcyclists in Vietnam.影响越南摩托车手酒驾意图的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(6):445-451. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2223328. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
6
Driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol: Predicting the intentions of young drivers.吸毒或酒驾:预测年轻司机的意图。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):97-101. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1869953. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Intentions and willingness to drive while drowsy among university students: An application of an extended theory of planned behavior model.大学生在困倦时开车的意图和意愿:计划行为扩展理论模型的应用
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Modeling motivation and habit in driving behavior under lifetime driver's license revocation.在终身吊销驾照的情况下,对驾驶行为中的动机和习惯进行建模。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;51:260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.017. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
9
The theory of planned behavior and dietary behaviors in competitive women bodybuilders.计划行为理论与竞技女性健体运动员的饮食行为。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):1716. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16568-w.
10
Seemingly irrational driving behavior model: The effect of habit strength and anticipated affective reactions.看似非理性的驾驶行为模型:习惯强度和预期情感反应的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Sep;82:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Study on the Applicability and Modification of the Design Hourly Volume on Rural Expressways Considering Holiday Traffic Polarization.考虑节假日交通极化的农村高速公路设计小时交通量适用性与修正研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169897.
2
Evaluation Method of the Driving Workload in the Horizontal Curve Section Based on the Human Model of Information Processing.基于信息处理人因模型的平曲线驾驶工作负荷评价方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;19(12):7063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127063.
3
Underestimated Risk Perception Characteristics of Drivers Based on Extended Theory of Planned Behavior.
基于扩展计划行为理论的驾驶员低估风险感知特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 26;19(5):2744. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052744.
4
How can socio-psychological factors be related to water-efficiency intention and behaviors among Iranian residential water consumers?社会心理因素如何与伊朗住宅用水消费者的节水意愿和行为相关?
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 15;288:112466. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112466. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
Understanding intentions to override intelligent speed assistance prior to widespread availability: An application of the theory of planned behaviour.理解在广泛应用之前有意推翻智能限速辅助系统的意图:计划行为理论的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105975. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105975. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
The extended theory of planned behavior considering heterogeneity under a connected vehicle environment: A case of uncontrolled non-signalized intersections.考虑到连接车辆环境下异质性的扩展计划行为理论:无信号控制交叉口的案例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105934. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105934. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Factors affecting behavior of mobile phone use while driving and effect of mobile phone use on driving performance.影响驾驶时使用手机行为的因素以及使用手机对驾驶表现的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105945. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105945. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
8
Understanding the predictors of young drivers' speeding intention and behaviour in a three-month longitudinal study.在一项为期三个月的纵向研究中了解年轻驾驶员超速意图和行为的预测因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105859. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105859. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
9
The influence of WeChat use on driving behavior in China: A study based on the theory of planned behavior.微信使用对中国驾驶行为的影响:基于计划行为理论的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105641. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105641. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
Significance of attitudes, passion and cultural factors in driver's speeding behavior in Oman: application of theory of planned behavior.阿曼驾驶员超速行为中态度、激情和文化因素的意义:计划行为理论的应用。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):172-180. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2019.1695632. Epub 2019 Dec 1.