Rouëssé J, Friedman S, Sarrazin D, Mouriesse H, Le Chevalier T, Arriagada R, Spielmann M, Papacharalambous A, May-Levin F
J Clin Oncol. 1986 Dec;4(12):1765-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.12.1765.
We report the largest series of induction chemotherapy for inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC). Results of two chemotherapy protocols with radiation therapy (RT) (170 patients) are compared with results with radiation alone (60 patients) in the treatment of this disease. From 1973 to 1975, 60 patients (control, group C) received RT (45 Gy and 20 to 30 Gy boost) and hormonal manipulation. From 1976 to 1980, 91 patients (group A) were treated with induction chemotherapy: Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), vincristine, and methotrexate (AVM) and RT on a cyclical schedule; and maintenance chemotherapy: vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (VCF). From 1980 to 1982, 79 patients (group B) received induction chemotherapy, Adriamycin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-FU (AVCMF) and RT on a cyclical schedule and VCF maintenance. Hormonal manipulation was performed in all groups. Disease-free survival at 4 years was 15% for group C, 32% for group A, and 54% for group B (P less than .005 group C v group A, less than .00001 group C v group B, and less than .01 group A v group B). Total survival at 4 years was 42% for group C, 53% for group A, and 74% for group B (P = .17 group C v group A, less than .00001 group C v group B, and less than .001 group A v group B). Clinical assessment of tumor aggressiveness, nodal status, type of chemotherapy administered, and early response to chemotherapy (by third course) were all prognostic factors. There is an important, highly statistically significant benefit in terms of both disease-free survival and total survival observed in patients treated with the addition of chemotherapy compared with radiation alone in IBC.
我们报告了关于炎性乳腺癌(IBC)诱导化疗的最大系列研究。将两种化疗方案联合放射治疗(RT)(170例患者)的结果与单纯放射治疗(60例患者)在该疾病治疗中的结果进行比较。1973年至1975年,60例患者(对照组,C组)接受了放射治疗(45 Gy及20至30 Gy的增强剂量)和激素治疗。1976年至1980年,91例患者(A组)接受诱导化疗:阿霉素(阿德里亚实验室,俄亥俄州哥伦布市)、长春新碱和甲氨蝶呤(AVM),并按周期进行放射治疗;以及维持化疗:长春新碱、环磷酰胺和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)(VCF)。1980年至1982年,79例患者(B组)接受诱导化疗,阿霉素、长春新碱、环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(AVCMF),并按周期进行放射治疗和VCF维持治疗。所有组均进行了激素治疗。C组4年无病生存率为15%,A组为32%,B组为54%(C组与A组相比P<0.005,C组与B组相比P<0.00001,A组与B组相比P<0.01)。C组4年总生存率为42%,A组为53%,B组为74%(C组与A组相比P = 0.17,C组与B组相比P<0.00001,A组与B组相比P<0.001)。肿瘤侵袭性的临床评估、淋巴结状态、所给予的化疗类型以及化疗的早期反应(至第三疗程)均为预后因素。与单纯放射治疗相比,在IBC患者中,联合化疗治疗在无病生存率和总生存率方面均观察到重要的、具有高度统计学意义的益处。