Sieving P A, Frishman L J, Steinberg R H
J Neurophysiol. 1986 Oct;56(4):1049-61. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.4.1049.
We describe a new response in proximal retina of cat that is present under scotopic conditions, clearly differs from PII (b-wave and DC component) and contributes a negative potential at threshold to the diffuse electroretinogram (ERG). We have termed this response the scotopic threshold response (STR). Extracellular potentials evoked in response to circular spots of light at dark-adapted threshold, and with dim backgrounds, were recorded with microelectrodes placed intraretinally at different depths. The dark-adapted response of proximal retina (STR) consisted of a graded negative potential to the onset of illumination that maintained amplitude during illumination and decayed back toward the base line at stimulus offset without evidence of a negative-going off response. It thereby differed in form from the photopic M-wave response of proximal retina, which has a negative-going off response. It also did not exhibit spatial tuning, simply increasing in size with stimulus area. In addition, the STR appears to be a rod-driven response whose threshold approximates that of the most sensitive ganglion cells in cat, whereas the M-wave is a much higher threshold cone-driven response. The STR could be clearly distinguished from PII on the basis of its form, depth-distribution, and dynamic range. For example, the STR had its maximum amplitude in the proximal retina at 17% retinal depth, whereas scotopic PII had its maximum in the distal retina at 48% retinal depth. Also, the STR had a lower threshold than PII intraretinally and saturated well below the level of saturation of scotopic PII (rod saturation). By analogy to the PNR and M-wave, the STR is hypothesized to represent either an extracellular voltage arising from proximal retinal neurons or Müller cell responses to K+ released by these neurons. Recording in the vitreous, near the retinal surface, showed that the STR always had a negative polarity. The polarity reversal of the STR at 50-60% retinal depth (from negative, proximal to positive, distal) suggested the presence of a sink proximal to the reversal point and a source distal to it. We also recorded the vitreal ERG in response to diffuse illumination of the dark-adapted retina. The STR could be clearly identified in the scotopic ERG as a threshold negative potential that had been observed previously in the mammalian ERG. The STR differs, therefore, from PII (b-wave and DC component) that is a higher threshold positive component in the diffuse ERG.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们描述了猫近端视网膜的一种新反应,该反应在暗视条件下出现,明显不同于PII(b波和直流成分),并在阈值时对弥漫性视网膜电图(ERG)贡献一个负电位。我们将这种反应称为暗视阈值反应(STR)。用微电极置于视网膜内不同深度,记录在暗适应阈值下以及在昏暗背景下对圆形光斑刺激所诱发的细胞外电位。近端视网膜的暗适应反应(STR)包括对光照开始的分级负电位,在光照期间保持振幅,在刺激结束时衰减回到基线,没有负向的终末反应迹象。因此,它在形式上不同于近端视网膜的明视M波反应,后者有负向的终末反应。它也不表现出空间调谐,只是随着刺激面积增大而增大。此外,STR似乎是一种由视杆驱动的反应,其阈值接近猫中最敏感神经节细胞的阈值,而M波是一种阈值高得多的由视锥驱动的反应。STR可以根据其形式、深度分布和动态范围与PII清楚地区分开。例如,STR在视网膜深度17%处的近端视网膜中具有最大振幅,而暗视PII在视网膜深度48%处的远端视网膜中具有最大振幅。此外,STR在视网膜内的阈值低于PII,并且在远低于暗视PII(视杆饱和)的饱和水平时就达到饱和。类似于PNR和M波,推测STR要么代表近端视网膜神经元产生的细胞外电压,要么代表Müller细胞对这些神经元释放的K+的反应。在靠近视网膜表面的玻璃体中记录显示,STR始终具有负极性。STR在视网膜深度50 - 60%处的极性反转(从近端的负到远端的正)表明在反转点近端存在一个电穴,在其远端存在一个电源。我们还记录了暗适应视网膜弥漫性光照下的玻璃体ERG。在暗视ERG中,STR可以清楚地识别为先前在哺乳动物ERG中观察到的阈值负电位。因此,STR不同于PII(b波和直流成分),后者是弥漫性ERG中阈值较高的正成分。(摘要截短于400字)