Professor of Prosthodontics, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Predoctoral student, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec;130(6):938.e1-938.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.015. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
Secondary caries around restorations is a major problem and can be attributed to bacteria invading microgaps formed at the tooth-restoration interface. An antibacterial composite resin containing quaternary ammonium silica (QASi) filler has been reported to inhibit enamel demineralization in situ. However, whether the prevention of enamel demineralization by QASi-containing composite resin is because of the reduced metabolic activity of acid-producing saliva bacteria is unclear.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of QASi-containing composite resin and 2 other restorative materials on the viability of salivary bacteria and sugar-induced acid production.
Whole saliva from each of the 30 study participants, 14 at high risk and 16 at low risk for caries, was brought into contact with quadruplicate specimens of 3 restorative materials, Infinix Flowable Composite, an anti-bacterial composite resin containing 1.5% QASi filler (Nobio), Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative (3M), a conventional flowable composite resin, and dental amalgam (Silmet). Bacterial growth and sugar-induced acid production on each restorative material were measured every 20 minutes for 18 hours. Caries risk groups were compared using the t test and repeated measures analysis of variance (α=.05). When significant, Bonferroni multiple comparisons were used.
On average, the saliva with the QASi-containing composite resin specimens maintained a near-neutral pH, not dropping below pH 6.0. The saliva associated with both conventional restorative materials exhibited a pH drop below 5.5 (P<.001), the critical threshold for tooth demineralization according to the Stephan curve. Virtually no growth was measured on the surface of the antibacterial composite resin, whereas bacteria grew on the conventional composite resin and dental amalgam (P<.001). No differences were observed between participants at high and low risk of caries.
Unlike amalgam and conventional composite resin, the QASi-containing composite resin showed a near-complete shutdown of the metabolic activity of salivary bacteria upon contact and virtually no bacterial viability. This suggests that the prevention of tooth demineralization by QASi-containing restoratives is associated with a significant reduction in bacterial metabolic activity.
修复体周围的继发龋是一个主要问题,其可归因于细菌侵入牙体-修复体界面形成的微间隙。含有季铵盐硅(QASi)填料的抗菌复合树脂已被报道可抑制釉质的脱矿。然而,含 QASi 的复合树脂对釉质脱矿的预防是否是由于产酸唾液细菌代谢活性降低尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是比较含 QASi 的复合树脂和其他 2 种修复材料对唾液细菌活力和糖诱导产酸的影响。
从 30 名研究参与者(高龋风险 14 名,低龋风险 16 名)的全唾液中,将其与 3 种修复材料的 4 个重复样本接触:Infinix 流动性复合树脂、含有 1.5%QASi 填料的抗菌复合树脂(Nobio)、Filtek Supreme 流动性修复体(3M),一种常规流动性复合树脂,以及银汞合金(Silmet)。每 20 分钟测量一次每种修复材料上的细菌生长和糖诱导产酸,共 18 小时。使用 t 检验和重复测量方差分析(α=.05)比较龋风险组。当有显著差异时,使用 Bonferroni 多重比较。
平均而言,含 QASi 的复合树脂样本的唾液保持接近中性 pH 值,未降至 pH 6.0 以下。两种常规修复材料的唾液均出现 pH 值降至 5.5 以下(P<.001),这是根据 Stephan 曲线牙脱矿的临界阈值。几乎没有测量到抗菌复合树脂表面的细菌生长,而常规复合树脂和银汞合金上有细菌生长(P<.001)。在高龋风险和低龋风险的参与者之间未观察到差异。
与银汞合金和常规复合树脂不同,含 QASi 的复合树脂在接触时表现出唾液细菌代谢活性的几乎完全关闭,几乎没有细菌活力。这表明,含 QASi 的修复体对牙脱矿的预防与细菌代谢活性的显著降低有关。