Suppr超能文献

左侧导管消融的抗血小板和抗凝治疗:心房颤动之外还有什么?

Antiplatelet and Anti-Coagulation Therapy for Left-Sided Catheter Ablations: What Is beyond Atrial Fibrillation?

作者信息

Nesti Martina, Lucà Fabiana, Duncker David, De Sensi Francesco, Malaczynska-Rajpold Katarzyna, Behar Jonathan M, Waldmann Victor, Ammar Ahmed, Mirizzi Gianluca, Garcia Rodrigue, Arnold Ahran, Mikhaylov Evgeny N, Kosiuk Jedrzej, Sciarra Luigi

机构信息

Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, 56124 Pisa, Italy.

Cardiology Department, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, 89129 Reggio Calabria, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 25;12(19):6183. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196183.

Abstract

International guidelines on the use of anti-thrombotic therapies in left-sided ablations other than atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking. The data regarding antiplatelet or anticoagulation strategies after catheter ablation (CA) procedures mainly derive from AF, whereas for the other arrhythmic substrates, the anti-thrombotic approach remains unclear. This survey aims to explore the current practices regarding antithrombotic management before, during, and after left-sided endocardial ablation, not including atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients without other indications for anti-thrombotic therapy. Electrophysiologists were asked to answer a questionnaire containing questions on antiplatelet (APT) and anticoagulation therapy for the following left-sided procedures: accessory pathway (AP), atrial (AT), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) with and without structural heart disease (SHD). We obtained 41 answers from 41 centers in 15 countries. For AP, before ablation, only four respondents (9.7%) used antiplatelets and two (4.9%) used anticoagulants. At discharge, APT therapy was prescribed by 22 respondents (53.7%), and oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) only by one (2.4%). In patients with atrial tachycardia (AT), before ablation, APT prophylaxis was prescribed by only four respondents (9.7%) and OAC by eleven (26.8%). At discharge, APT was recommended by 12 respondents (29.3%) and OAC by 24 (58.5%). For VT without SHD, before CA, only six respondents (14.6%) suggested APT and three (7.3%) suggested OAC prophylaxis. At discharge, APT was recommended by fifteen respondents (36.6%) and OAC by five (12.2%). Regarding VT in SHD, before the procedure, eight respondents (19.5%) prescribed APT and five (12.2%) prescribed OAC prophylaxis. At discharge, the administration of anti-thrombotic therapy depended on the LV ejection fraction for eleven respondents (26.8%), on the procedure time for ten (24.4%), and on the radiofrequency time for four (9.8%), with a cut-off value from 1 to 30 min. Our survey indicates that the management of anti-thrombotic therapy surrounding left-sided endocardial ablation of patients without other indications for anti-thrombotic therapy is highly variable. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the safest approach to these procedures.

摘要

目前缺乏关于在除心房颤动(AF)以外的左侧消融术中使用抗血栓治疗的国际指南。关于导管消融(CA)术后抗血小板或抗凝策略的数据主要来自心房颤动,而对于其他心律失常基质,抗血栓治疗方法仍不明确。本调查旨在探讨在无其他抗血栓治疗指征的患者中,左侧心内膜消融术前、术中和术后抗血栓管理的当前实践,不包括心房颤动(AF)。电生理学家被要求回答一份问卷,其中包含以下左侧手术的抗血小板(APT)和抗凝治疗问题:有或无结构性心脏病(SHD)的旁路(AP)、房性心动过速(AT)和室性心动过速(VT)。我们从15个国家的41个中心获得了41份回复。对于AP,消融术前,只有4名受访者(9.7%)使用抗血小板药物,2名(4.9%)使用抗凝剂。出院时,22名受访者(53.7%)开具了APT治疗,只有1名(2.4%)开具了口服抗凝治疗(OAC)。在房性心动过速(AT)患者中,消融术前,只有4名受访者(9.7%)开具了APT预防,11名(26.8%)开具了OAC。出院时,12名受访者(29.3%)推荐了APT,24名(58.5%)推荐了OAC。对于无SHD的VT,CA术前,只有6名受访者(14.6%)建议使用APT,3名(7.3%)建议使用OAC预防。出院时,15名受访者(36.6%)推荐了APT,5名(12.2%)推荐了OAC。对于有SHD的VT,术前,8名受访者(19.5%)开具了APT,5名(12.2%)开具了OAC预防。出院时,11名受访者(26.8%)根据左心室射血分数决定抗血栓治疗的使用,10名(24.4%)根据手术时间决定,4名(9.8%)根据射频时间决定,临界值为1至30分钟。我们的调查表明,在无其他抗血栓治疗指征的患者中,围绕左侧心内膜消融的抗血栓治疗管理差异很大。有必要进行进一步研究以评估这些手术的最安全方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f897/10573733/af967af36794/jcm-12-06183-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验