• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对ST段抬高型心肌梗死所致心源性休克结局的影响。

The Impact of Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes Following ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Arnold Joshua H, Perl Leor, Assali Abid, Codner Pablo, Greenberg Gabriel, Samara Abid, Porter Avital, Orvin Katia, Kornowski Ran, Vaknin Assa Hana

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva 4941492, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 28;12(19):6259. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196259.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12196259
PMID:37834902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10573491/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the leading cause of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related mortality. Contemporary studies have shown no sex-related differences in mortality.

METHODS

STEMI-CS patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were included based on a dedicated prospective STEMI database. We compared sex-specific differences in CS characteristics at baseline, during hospitalization, and in subsequent clinical outcomes. Endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

Of 3202 consecutive STEMI patients, 210 (6.5%) had CS, of which 63 (30.0%) were women. Women were older than men (73.2 vs. 65.5% y, < 0.01), and more had hypertension (68.3 vs. 52.8%, = 0.019) and diabetes (38.7 vs. 24.8%, = 0.047). Fewer were smokers (13.3 vs. 41.2%, < 0.01), had previous PCI (9.1 vs. 22.3% = 0.016), or required IABP (35.3 vs. 51.1% = 0.027). Women had higher rates of mortality (53.2 vs. 35.3% in-hospital, = 0.01; 61.3 vs. 41.9% at 1 month, = 0.01; and 73.8 vs. 52.6% at 3 years, = 0.05) and MACE (60.6 vs. 41.6% in-hospital, = 0.032; 66.1 vs. 45.6% at 1 month, = 0.007; and 62.9 vs. 80.3% at 3 years, = 0.015). After multivariate adjustment, female sex remained an independent factor for death (HR-2.42 [95% CI 1.014-5.033], = 0.042) and MACE (HR-1.91 [95% CI 1.217-3.031], = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CS complicating STEMI is associated with greater short- and long-term mortality and MACE in women. Sex-focused measures to improve diagnosis and treatment are mandatory for CS patients.

摘要

背景

心源性休克(CS)仍然是ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)相关死亡的主要原因。当代研究表明,死亡率不存在性别差异。

方法

基于一个专门的前瞻性STEMI数据库,纳入接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的STEMI-CS患者。我们比较了基线、住院期间以及后续临床结局中心源性休克特征的性别差异。终点包括全因死亡率和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。

结果

在3202例连续的STEMI患者中,210例(6.5%)发生了CS,其中63例(30.0%)为女性。女性比男性年龄更大(73.2岁对65.5岁,P<0.01),患有高血压的更多(68.3%对52.8%,P = 0.019),患有糖尿病的更多(38.7%对24.8%,P = 0.047)。吸烟者更少(13.3%对41.2%,P<0.01),既往有PCI史的更少(9.1%对22.3%,P = 0.016),或需要主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)的更少(35.3%对51.1%,P = 0.027)。女性的死亡率更高(住院期间53.2%对35.3%,P = 0.01;1个月时61.3%对41.9%,P = 0.01;3年时73.8%对52.6%,P = 0.05),MACE发生率更高(住院期间60.6%对41.6%,P = 0.032;1个月时66.1%对45.6%,P = 0.007;3年时62.9%对80.3%,P = 0.015)。多因素调整后,女性性别仍然是死亡(HR-2.42[95%CI 1.014-5.033],P = 0.042)和MACE(HR-1.91[95%CI 1.217-3.031],P = 0.01)的独立因素。

结论

并发STEMI的CS与女性更高的短期和长期死亡率及MACE相关。针对CS患者,采取以性别为重点的措施改善诊断和治疗是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db4/10573491/8f607e5b85cf/jcm-12-06259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db4/10573491/5c9309f9f6ca/jcm-12-06259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db4/10573491/8f607e5b85cf/jcm-12-06259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db4/10573491/5c9309f9f6ca/jcm-12-06259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db4/10573491/8f607e5b85cf/jcm-12-06259-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes Following ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.性别对ST段抬高型心肌梗死所致心源性休克结局的影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 28;12(19):6259. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196259.
2
Clinical predictors and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock in the Asian population.亚洲人群中ST段抬高型心肌梗死相关心源性休克的临床预测因素及预后
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Jul 12;53:101463. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101463. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Sex bias in admission to tertiary-care centres for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死和心原性休克患者收治于三级医疗中心的性别偏见。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Jul;51(7):e13526. doi: 10.1111/eci.13526. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
4
Comparison of the prognosis for different onset stage of cardiogenic shock secondary to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.比较不同发病阶段的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死所致心原性休克的预后。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01583-1.
5
Incidence and Predictors of Adverse Events Among Initially Stable ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后稳定初期不良事件的发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e025572. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025572. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
6
Implementation of a Comprehensive ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Protocol Improves Mortality Among Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.实施全面的ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗方案可改善ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;134:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
7
Fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.纤溶疗法与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):2025-2035. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13281. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
8
Efficacy of Mechanical Circulatory Support Used Before Versus After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock From ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机械循环支持在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死所致心原性休克患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前后应用的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Sep;42:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 6.
9
Sex-related differences in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI: A long-term mortality study.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的性别差异:一项长期死亡率研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Apr-May;16(3):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
10
Complete Versus Culprit only Revascularisation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group.在并发急性心肌梗死的心源性休克患者中,完全血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建的比较:来自伦敦心肌梗死研究组的发生率和结局。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Mar;21(3):350-358. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine-learning based calculator for personalized risk assessment following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.基于机器学习的ST段抬高型心肌梗死后个性化风险评估计算器。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 28;25(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04896-1.
2
Sex Differences in Non-Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the Northwell-Shock Registry.非急性心肌梗死心源性休克中的性别差异:来自诺斯韦尔休克登记处的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 16;14(12):4274. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124274.
3
Ischaemia-reperfusion time differences in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in very young patients: a cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的管理和结局的性别差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 28;15(6):642-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.12.033.
2
Sex differences in patients with cardiogenic shock.心源性休克患者的性别差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):1775-1783. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13303. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
Independent Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.外周动脉疾病对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的独立影响。
极年轻患者ST段抬高型心肌梗死的缺血再灌注时间差异:一项队列研究
Open Heart. 2025 Jan 28;12(1):e002957. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002957.
4
Concurrent intra-aortic balloon pump and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute coronary syndrome-related cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis of multivariate studies.主动脉内球囊反搏与静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合联合治疗急性冠状动脉综合征相关心源性休克:多变量研究的荟萃分析
Biomol Biomed. 2025 Apr 26;25(6):1233-1244. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.11011.
5
Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis.性别对心原性休克患者治疗效果和预后的影响:系统回顾和流行病学荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 6;28(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(24):e017655. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017655. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019.美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、重症医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)于 2019 年 4 月共同发布了心血管造影协会(SCAI)关于心源性休克分类的临床专家共识声明。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329. Epub 2019 May 19.
5
Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):e011991. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011991.
6
Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.经皮 Impella 辅助治疗伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):1249-1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614.
7
Gender differences in the clinical features and outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病患者临床特征及预后的性别差异
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 Feb;17(2):127-133. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1561277. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
8
Multisite vascular disease in acute coronary syndromes: increased in-hospital mortality and no improvement over time.急性冠状动脉综合征中的多部位血管疾病:住院死亡率增加且未随时间改善。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(7):748-757. doi: 10.1177/2048872618814708. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
9
Gender Disparities in Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction.性别差异对急性心肌梗死的表现、治疗和预后的影响。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 Jun 16;20(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-1006-7.
10
Sex differences in discharge destination following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后出院目的地的性别差异。
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Sep;29(6):502-510. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000643.