• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可食用和休闲强化物对家养犬的功效。

Efficacy of Edible and Leisure Reinforcers with Domestic Dogs.

作者信息

Lazaro Xenabeth A, Winter John M, Fernand Jonathan K, Cox David J, Dorey Nicole R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Florida Institute of Technology, School of Behavior Analysis, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;13(19):3073. doi: 10.3390/ani13193073.

DOI:10.3390/ani13193073
PMID:37835679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10571986/
Abstract

Preference assessments are often used to identify stimuli that function as potential reinforcers for training or intervention purposes. Specifically, various preference assessment formats have been used to identify preferred stimuli for humans, cockroaches, cotton-top tamarins, tortoises, and wolves, to name a few. However, to date, no study has evaluated the differential efficacy between food and leisure stimuli within domestic dogs. The current study aimed to compare the reinforcing value and efficacy between food and leisure stimuli for domestic dogs by comparing rates of behavior when receiving access to either their top-preferred food or leisure items. Overall results suggest (1) domestic dogs prefer food over leisure items, and (2) food is more likely to function as a reinforcer than leisure items for domestic dog's behavior. These results suggest that dog owners and trainers should consider using food reinforcers over leisure items as reinforcers when attempting to train dogs.

摘要

偏好评估通常用于识别作为训练或干预目的潜在强化物的刺激物。具体而言,各种偏好评估形式已被用于识别人类、蟑螂、棉顶狨猴、乌龟和狼等的偏好刺激物,仅举几例。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究评估家犬对食物和休闲刺激物的不同效力。本研究旨在通过比较家犬在获得其最偏好的食物或休闲物品时的行为发生率,来比较食物和休闲刺激物对家犬的强化价值和效力。总体结果表明:(1)家犬更喜欢食物而非休闲物品;(2)对于家犬的行为,食物比休闲物品更有可能起到强化物的作用。这些结果表明,狗主人和训练师在试图训练狗时,应考虑使用食物强化物而非休闲物品作为强化物。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Edible and Leisure Reinforcers with Domestic Dogs.可食用和休闲强化物对家养犬的功效。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;13(19):3073. doi: 10.3390/ani13193073.
2
Owner-implemented paired-stimulus food preference assessments for companion dogs.主人实施的伴侣犬配对刺激食物偏好评估。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2023 Jul;120(1):62-77. doi: 10.1002/jeab.846. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
3
Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli.可食用、休闲和社交注意力刺激物的偏好稳定性和强化效力。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):684-699. doi: 10.1002/jaba.807. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
A comparison of displacement and reinforcer potency for typically developing children.正常发展儿童的位移和强化物效力比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Apr;53(2):1130-1144. doi: 10.1002/jaba.636. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
Single- vs. combined-category preference assessments for edible, leisure, and social-interaction stimuli.针对可食用、休闲和社交互动刺激的单类别与组合类别偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023;56(4):787-803. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1007. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
6
Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.可食用强化物与休闲强化物的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Summer;48(2):331-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.200. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
A comparison of paired- and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessments to identify reinforcers for dog behavior.配对刺激与无替换多刺激偏好评估用于识别犬类行为强化物的比较
J Exp Anal Behav. 2023 Jul;120(1):78-90. doi: 10.1002/jeab.857. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.评估犬类的偏好和强化物有效性。
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
9
Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.在偏好评估期间,食物对休闲强化物的替代作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):475-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-475.
10
Relative efficacy of human social interaction and food as reinforcers for domestic dogs and hand-reared wolves.人类社会互动和食物对家犬和人工饲养狼的强化作用的相对效力。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jul;98(1):105-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-105.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.食物偏好和强化物有效性的系统评估:圈养恒河猴训练实验室的改进
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
Social interaction, food, scent or toys? A formal assessment of domestic pet and shelter cat (Felis silvestris catus) preferences.社交互动、食物、气味还是玩具?对家养宠物猫和收容所猫(家猫)偏好的正式评估。
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 3):322-328. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
Concurrent progressive-ratio and fixed-ratio schedule performance under geometric and arithmetic progressions by brushtail possums.
帚尾袋貂在几何级数和算术级数下的同时渐进比率和固定比率时间表表现
Behav Processes. 2016 May;126:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Assessing Food Preferences in Dogs and Cats: A Review of the Current Methods.评估犬猫的食物偏好:当前方法综述
Animals (Basel). 2015 Mar 18;5(1):126-37. doi: 10.3390/ani5010126.
5
A method to assess relative preference for training and environmental enrichment in captive wolves (Canis lupus and Canis lupus arctos).一种评估圈养狼(灰狼和北极狼)对训练和环境富集的相对偏好的方法。
Zoo Biol. 2015 Nov;34(6):513-7. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21239. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
6
Quantitative analysis of performance on a progressive-ratio schedule: effects of reinforcer type, food deprivation and acute treatment with Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).渐进比率程序下行为表现的定量分析:强化物类型、食物剥夺及 Δ⁹-四氢大麻酚(THC)急性处理的影响
Behav Processes. 2015 Apr;113:122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Is preference a predictor of enrichment efficacy in Galapagos tortoises (Chelonoidis nigra)?偏好是否是加拉帕戈斯象龟(Chelonoidis nigra)富集效果的预测指标?
Zoo Biol. 2014 Jul-Aug;33(4):275-84. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21151. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.评估犬类的偏好和强化物有效性。
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
9
Relative efficacy of human social interaction and food as reinforcers for domestic dogs and hand-reared wolves.人类社会互动和食物对家犬和人工饲养狼的强化作用的相对效力。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jul;98(1):105-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-105.
10
Applications of Preference Assessment Procedures in Depression and Agitation Management in Elders with Dementia.偏好评估程序在老年痴呆症患者抑郁和激越管理中的应用
Clin Gerontol. 2009;32(3):239-259. doi: 10.1080/07317110902895226. Epub 2009 May 20.