Ren Xiaojian, Cui Kehui, Deng Zhiming, Han Kaiyan, Peng Yuxuan, Zhou Jiyong, Zhai Zhongbing, Huang Jianliang, Peng Shaobing
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Key Laboratory of Corp Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Plant Science and Technology of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Wuxue Agro-Technology Extension Service Center, Wuxue 435499, China.
Plants (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;12(19):3354. doi: 10.3390/plants12193354.
The ratoon rice cropping system (RR) is developing rapidly in China due to its comparable annual yield and lower agricultural and labor inputs than the double rice cropping system (DR). Here, to further compare the greenhouse effects of RR and DR, a two-year field experiment was carried out in Hubei Province, central China. The ratoon season showed significantly lower cumulative CH emissions than the main season of RR, the early season and late season of DR. RR led to significantly lower annual cumulative CH emissions, but no significant difference in cumulative annual NO emissions compared with DR. In RR, the main and ratoon seasons had significantly higher and lower grain yields than the early and late seasons of DR, respectively, resulting in comparable annual grain yields between the two systems. In addition, the ratoon season had significantly lower global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity-based grain yield (GHGI) than the main and late seasons. The annual GWP and GHGI of RR were significantly lower than those of DR. In general, the differences in annual CH emissions, GWP, and GHGI could be primarily attributed to the differences between the ratoon season and the late season. Moreover, GWP and GHGI exhibited significant positive correlations with cumulative emissions of CH rather than NO. The leaf area index (LAI) and biomass accumulation in the ratoon season were significantly lower than those in the main season and late season, and CH emissions, GWP, and GHGI showed significant positive correlations with LAI, biomass accumulation and grain yield in the ratoon and late season. Finally, RR had significantly higher net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) than DR. Overall, this study indicates that RR is a green cropping system with lower annual CH emissions, GWP, and GHGI as well as higher NEEB.
由于再生稻种植系统(RR)的年产量与双季稻种植系统(DR)相当,且农业和劳动力投入较低,因此在中国发展迅速。在此,为了进一步比较RR和DR的温室效应,在中国中部的湖北省进行了为期两年的田间试验。再生季的CH累计排放量显著低于RR的主季、DR的早季和晚季。与DR相比,RR导致年度CH累计排放量显著降低,但年度NO累计排放量无显著差异。在RR中,主季和再生季的谷物产量分别显著高于和低于DR的早季和晚季,导致两个系统的年度谷物产量相当。此外,再生季的全球变暖潜势(GWP)和基于温室气体强度的谷物产量(GHGI)显著低于主季和晚季。RR的年度GWP和GHGI显著低于DR。总体而言,年度CH排放量、GWP和GHGI的差异主要可归因于再生季和晚季之间的差异。此外,GWP和GHGI与CH的累计排放量呈显著正相关,而与NO的累计排放量无显著正相关。再生季的叶面积指数(LAI)和生物量积累显著低于主季和晚季,且CH排放量、GWP和GHGI与再生季和晚季的LAI、生物量积累和谷物产量呈显著正相关。最后,RR的净生态系统经济效益(NEEB)显著高于DR。总体而言,本研究表明RR是一种绿色种植系统,具有较低的年度CH排放量、GWP和GHGI以及较高的NEEB。